IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2830-d1618270.html

Remote Worker Communication Technology Use Related to Role Clarity, Coworker Support, and Work Overload

Author

Listed:
  • Inyoung Shin

    (Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA)

  • Sarah E. Riforgiate

    (Department of Communication, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA)

  • Emily A. Godager

    (Department of Communication, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA)

  • Michael C. Coker

    (Department of Communication, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA)

Abstract

Building upon the job demands-resources model, this study examines how communication technology (CT) use in remote work relates to role clarity, coworker support, work overload, and, in turn, burnout to enhance sustainable worker and organizational workplace practices. By analyzing non-experimental survey data from 447 U.S. workers transitioning to remote work in 2020, we found that job demands/resources mediated the relationships between CTs and burnout, with each CT linked to specific demands/resources. Phone calls, email, and instant messaging were associated with role clarity and coworker support, mitigating burnout. Video calls were linked to higher work overload and increased burnout which can decrease worker and organizational sustainability. Our findings highlight the importance of CT use in relation to employee well-being. Supported by affordance theory, we found that each CT had unique associations with job resources and demands when CTs served as key communication channels during organizational transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Inyoung Shin & Sarah E. Riforgiate & Emily A. Godager & Michael C. Coker, 2025. "Remote Worker Communication Technology Use Related to Role Clarity, Coworker Support, and Work Overload," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2830-:d:1618270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul M. Leonardi, 2021. "COVID‐19 and the New Technologies of Organizing: Digital Exhaust, Digital Footprints, and Artificial Intelligence in the Wake of Remote Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 249-253, January.
    2. Zenon Pokojski & Agnieszka Kister & Marcin Lipowski, 2022. "Remote Work Efficiency from the Employers’ Perspective—What’s Next?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Aini Farmania & Riska Dwinda Elsyah & Ananda Fortunisa, 2022. "The Phenomenon of Technostress during the COVID-19 Pandemic Due to Work from Home in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Vanessa Molinero de Paula & Júlia Teles & Teresa Patrone Cotrim, 2024. "Organizational and Individual Factors Influencing the Quality of Working Life Among Brazilian University Professors during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Stephen R. Barley & Debra E. Meyerson & Stine Grodal, 2011. "E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 887-906, August.
    6. Boas, Taylor C. & Christenson, Dino P. & Glick, David M., 2020. "Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 232-250, April.
    7. van Zoonen, Ward & Sivunen, Anu & Blomqvist, Kirsimarja & Olsson, Thomas & Ropponen, Annina & Henttonen, Kaisa & Vartiainen, Matti, 2021. "Understanding stressor–strain relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of social support, adjustment to remote work, and work–life conflict," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(6), pages 1038-1059, November.
    8. Loredana Mihalca & Lucia Ratiu & Gabriela Brendea & Daniel Metz & Mihaela Dragan & Florin Dobre, 2021. "Exhaustion while teleworking during COVID-19: a moderated-mediation model of role clarity, self-efficacy, and task interdependence," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 269-306, June.
    9. Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Paul H. P. Yeow & Andrew Thatcher, 2023. "Advancing Sustainability in the Future of Work through the Design of Post-Pandemic Work-from-Home Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Ayoko, Oluremi B. & Konrad, Alison M. & Boyle, Maree V., 2012. "Online work: Managing conflict and emotions for performance in virtual teams," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 156-174.
    11. Rutherford, Brian N. & Shepherd, C. David & Tashchian, Armen, 2015. "Validating the reduced burnout scale and sequencing of burnout," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 67-73.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madeleine Rauch & Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari, 2022. "Waging War from Remote Cubicles: How Workers Cope with Technologies That Disrupt the Meaning and Morality of Their Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 83-104, January.
    2. Carlo Drago & Luisa Errichiello, 2024. "Remote Work admist the Covid-19 outbreak: Insights from an Ensemble Community-Based Keyword Network Analysis," Working Papers 2024.05, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    3. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    4. S. Brent Jackson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & Lincoln R. Larson & M. Nils Peterson & Erin Seekamp, 2021. "Outdoor Activity Participation Improves Adolescents’ Mental Health and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Park, Keunhyun & Chamberlain, Brent & Song, Ziqi & Nasr Esfahani, Hossein & Sheen, Jeff & Larsen, Teresa & Long Novack, Valerie & Licon, Carlos & Christensen, Keith, 2022. "A double jeopardy: COVID-19 impacts on the travel behavior and community living of people with disabilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-35.
    6. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    7. Paraschiv Dorel Mihai & ȚIțan Emilia & Manea Daniela Ioana & Ionescu Crina Dana & Mihai Mihaela & Șerban Octavian, 2022. "The change in e-commerce in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 220-233, June.
    8. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    9. Shanshan Zhang & Fengchun Huang & Yuting Zhang & Qiwen Li, 2023. "A Person-Environment Fit Model to Explain Information and Communication Technologies-Enabled After-Hours Work-Related Interruptions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Steponas Jonušauskas, 2013. "Silent issues of ICT era: impact of techno-stress to the work and life balance of employees," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(2), pages 108-115, December.
    11. Barton, Jared & Pan, Xiaofei, 2022. "Movin’ on up? A survey experiment on mobility enhancing policies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Aleksi Aaltonen & Marta Stelmaszak, 2024. "The Performative Production of Trace Data in Knowledge Work," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1448-1462, September.
    13. Niina Nurmi & Pamela J Hinds, 2016. "Job complexity and learning opportunities: A silver lining in the design of global virtual work," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(6), pages 631-654, August.
    14. Robert Kubinec & Haillie Na‐Kyung Lee & Andrey Tomashevskiy, 2021. "Politically connected companies are less likely to shutdown due to COVID‐19 restrictions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2155-2169, September.
    15. Narae Kim & Jeong-Nam Kim, 2024. "A COVID-19 Paradox of Communication, Ignorance, and Vaccination Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    16. Giurge, Laura M. & Bohns, Vanessa K., 2021. "You don’t need to answer right away! Receivers overestimate how quickly senders expect responses to non-urgent work emails," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 114-128.
    17. Kaitlynn Sandstrom‐Mistry & Frank Lupi & Hyunjung Kim & Joseph A. Herriges, 2023. "Comparing water quality valuation across probability and non‐probability samples," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 744-761, June.
    18. Godfred Anakpo & Zanele Nqwayibana & Syden Mishi, 2023. "The Impact of Work-from-Home on Employee Performance and Productivity: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Monica Ioana Burcă-Voicu & Romana Emilia Cramarenco & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Investigating Learners’ Teaching Format Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation on an Emerging Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Amber D. Thompson & Rebecca L. Utz, 2025. "Online surveys: lessons learned in detecting and protecting against insincerity and bots," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 23-39, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2830-:d:1618270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.