IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8568-d1757120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: A Longitudinal Comparative Study on Moderators of Agenda 2030

Author

Listed:
  • Eric M. Chang

    (Institute of Business and Management, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 100, Taiwan)

  • Jo-Han Cheng

    (Institute of Business and Management, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 100, Taiwan)

Abstract

Agenda 2030, embodied by the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), represents a global commitment to advancing transparency, accountability, and sustainable development. This study examines whether the introduction of the SDGs in 2015 is associated with changes in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance trajectories among major multinational corporations. The analysis uses a piecewise latent trajectory model to examine the ESG trajectories of 320 Global Fortune 500 firms, spanning both the manufacturing and service sectors across developed and developing economies, over the period of 2010–2021. The time frame is deliberately segmented into a pre-SDG period (2010–2015) and one post-SDG implementation (2016–2021) to capture how ESG practices evolved following the launch of the SDGs as a global policy milestone. Our results highlight significant governance improvements in developed economies, especially within manufacturing, driven by regulatory changes and mandatory reporting, while environmental performance trends are more variable and social factors lag in some regions. These findings yield actionable insights for policymakers and managers by pinpointing industrial and regional disparities, thereby informing targeted strategies to advance SDG-aligned ESG practices and harmonize future reporting frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric M. Chang & Jo-Han Cheng, 2025. "The Evolution of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: A Longitudinal Comparative Study on Moderators of Agenda 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8568-:d:1757120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8568/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8568/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8568-:d:1757120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.