IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8269-d1749508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Influencing Factors of Industrial Design Agglomeration on Manufacturing Innovation Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayang Chen

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Bing Xu

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Shihao Zhang

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Wuzhenhang Chen

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Xingxia Wu

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Zhiyue Ying

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

Abstract

Context: As a pivotal productive service industry, industrial design is increasingly recognized for its enabling role in manufacturing innovation through industrial agglomeration. Objectives: This study examines the factors influencing regional manufacturing innovation performance driven by industrial design agglomeration, identifying differential effects of agglomeration elements on innovation input versus output. Methods: Utilizing panel data from 10 prefecture-level cities in Zhejiang Province, China (2015–2022), we constructed an industrial design agglomeration index system spanning four dimensions—industrial agglomeration, industrial scale, human resources, and development environment—alongside manufacturing innovation performance metrics covering both input and output. A two-way fixed-effects model was employed for empirical analysis, with robustness checks conducted to ensure methodological rigor. Results: The findings demonstrate a statistically significant positive correlation between industrial design agglomeration and manufacturing innovation performance. Notably, industrial scale and developmental environment emerged as the most influential factors for innovation output enhancement, while human capital exhibited limited supportive capacity. The agglomeration effect was particularly pronounced in technologically advanced regions. Conclusions: Industrial design agglomeration can underpin the sustainable advancement of manufacturing innovation capabilities. We propose context-specific strategies to refine service platforms, accelerate design-manufacturing integration and digital transformation, and foster sustainable high-quality development in manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayang Chen & Bing Xu & Shihao Zhang & Wuzhenhang Chen & Xingxia Wu & Zhiyue Ying, 2025. "Study on Influencing Factors of Industrial Design Agglomeration on Manufacturing Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-37, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8269-:d:1749508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei Feng & Ye Wang, 2023. "More Government Subsidies, More Innovation of New Energy Firms? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Muhammad Asif & Liu Yang & Muhammad Hashim, 2024. "The Role of Digital Transformation, Corporate Culture, and Leadership in Enhancing Corporate Sustainable Performance in the Manufacturing Sector of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Xuemeng Guo & Ke Guo & Lingpeng Kong, 2023. "Industrial Agglomeration and Corporate ESG Performance: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing and Producer Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Huicong Li & Jie Wang & Ruzhen Zhang & Mengran Duan, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Sustained Innovation in the VUCA Context: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Bing Xu & Siyuan Kong & Zhiyue Ying & Jiayang Chen & Shihao Zhang & Yuting Yan & Jun Xu, 2024. "Research on Impact of Design Innovation Factors on Pure Technical Efficiency of Manufacturing Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Baptista, Rui & Swann, Peter, 1998. "Do firms in clusters innovate more?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 525-540, September.
    7. Rotemberg, Julio J. & Saloner, Garth, 2000. "Competition and human capital accumulation: a theory of interregional specialization and trade," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 373-404, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Grashof, 2020. "Sinking or swimming in the cluster labour pool? A firm-specific analysis of the effect of specialized labour," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Pe'er, Aviad & Keil, Thomas, 2013. "Are all startups affected similarly by clusters? Agglomeration, competition, firm heterogeneity, and survival," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 354-372.
    4. Isabel Díez-Vial & Marta Fernández-Olmos, 2015. "Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 70-84, February.
    5. McCann, Brian T. & Folta, Timothy B., 2011. "Performance differentials within geographic clusters," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 104-123, January.
    6. Shivaram V. Devarakonda & Brian T. McCann & Jeffrey J. Reuer, 2018. "Marshallian Forces and Governance Externalities: Location Effects on Contractual Safeguards in Research and Development Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1112-1129, December.
    7. Jianyi Li & Douglas Webster & Jianming Cai & Larissa Muller, 2019. "Innovation Clusters Revisited: On Dimensions of Agglomeration, Institution, and Built-Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Diez-Vial, Isabel, 2011. "Geographical cluster and performance: The case of Iberian ham," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 517-525, August.
    9. Audia, Pino G. & Rider, Christopher I., 2010. "Close, but not the same: Locally headquartered organizations and agglomeration economies in a declining industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 360-374, April.
    10. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    11. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Fabrice Comptour, 2010. "Do clusters generate greater innovation and growth? An analysis of European regions," Working Papers 2010-15, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales.
    12. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl, 2013. "Innovation and Knowledge Links in Metropolitan Regions: The Case of Vienna," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Johan Klaesson & Börje Johansson & Charlie Karlsson (ed.), Metropolitan Regions, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 451-472, Springer.
    13. Carla Costa & Rui Baptista, 2012. "Agglomeration vs. Organizational Reproduction: The Molds Cluster in Portugal," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1222, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2012.
    14. Pedro de Faria & Francisco Lima, 2012. "Interdependence and spillovers: is firm performance affected by others’ innovation activities?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(36), pages 4765-4775, December.
    15. Lara Agostini & Federico Caviggioli & Francesco Galati & Barbara Bigliardi, 2020. "A social perspective of knowledge-based innovation: mobility and agglomeration. Introduction to the special section," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1309-1323, October.
    16. Bruce Fallick & Charles A. Fleischman & James B. Rebitzer, 2006. "Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Microfoundations of a High-Technology Cluster," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(3), pages 472-481, August.
    17. Mireia Fernández-Ardevol & Josep Lladós Masllorens, 2011. "Determinants of Science-Based Cooperation: Evidence in a Sample of Small and Micro Firms," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 9(4 (Winter), pages 319-333.
    18. Seungil Yum, 2019. "The interaction between knowledge-intensive business services and urban economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 53-83, August.
    19. William R. Kerr & Scott Duke Kominers, 2015. "Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(4), pages 877-899, October.
    20. Michael Storper & Anthony J. Venables, 2004. "Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 351-370, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8269-:d:1749508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.