IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7433-d1726297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of State-Owned Capital Participation on Carbon Emission Reduction in Private Enterprises: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Runsen Yuan

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
    Hebei Coastal Region Port-Adjacent Industry Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Yan Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Chunling Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

  • Xiaoran Sun

    (School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Lingyi Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066000, China)

Abstract

Carbon emission reduction serves as a pivotal strategy for advancing global environmental quality and sustainable socioeconomic development. Private enterprises serve as the primary contributors to industrial carbon emissions. Their low-carbon transition is directly tied to the achievement of China’s Dual Carbon Goals. However, constrained by market failures and the profit-driven nature of capital, these enterprises face significant challenges in both motivation and capacity for carbon emission reduction. As a critical link connecting government and market forces, whether state-owned capital can effectively drive private enterprises to reduce emissions and conserve energy still lacks systematic empirical evidence. Leveraging a panel dataset of private industrial listed companies on China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets spanning 2008–2022, we examine the impact of state-owned capital participation on carbon emission reduction and the underlying mechanisms. The empirical results demonstrate that state-owned capital participation can significantly drive carbon emission reduction and propel the low-carbon transformation of private enterprises. Mechanism analysis reveals that state-owned capital participation promotes carbon emission reduction through multiple avenues, including enriching the green resource base, strengthening the value recognition of environmental social responsibility, and improving energy efficiency. Further analysis indicates that the emission reduction effect of state-owned capital participation is more pronounced under conditions of weaker government environmental regulation, lower regional marketization, greater industry competition, and tighter green financing constraints. This study enriches the research on mixed-ownership reform and low-carbon transition of enterprises, deepens the theoretical understanding of the internal mechanism of state-owned capital participation affecting carbon emission reduction, and offers empirical evidence for emerging economies to address the dilemma of emission reduction through property rights integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Runsen Yuan & Yan Li & Chunling Li & Xiaoran Sun & Lingyi Li, 2025. "The Impact of State-Owned Capital Participation on Carbon Emission Reduction in Private Enterprises: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-39, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7433-:d:1726297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiao Chen & Yan Mao & Alastair M. Morrison, 2021. "Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Tourism Carbon Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Aimin Qian & Jingyan Li, 2024. "Effect of Appointed Directors on Corporate Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from Mixed-Ownership Reform in Chinese Private Industrial Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-37, July.
    3. Elena Vaagenes Andersen & Jakob Willem Wilts & Yuli Shan & Franco Ruzzenenti & Klaus Hubacek, 2025. "Carbon implications of sovereign wealth funds," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2072-2084, March.
    4. Wei Jiang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Chuang Zhang, 2020. "Stakeholder Relationship Capability and Firm Innovation: A Contingent Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 111-125, November.
    5. James J. Cordeiro & Ambra Galeazzo & Tara Shankar Shaw & Rajaram Veliyath & M. K. Nandakumar, 2018. "Correction to: Ownership influences on corporate social responsibility in the Indian context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1137-1137, December.
    6. Valta, Philip, 2012. "Competition and the cost of debt," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 661-682.
    7. Wenjing Li & Dan Tong & Hong Sun, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Fintech on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from 286 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Rongrong Li & Qiang Wang & Xueting Li, 2025. "Geopolitical risks and carbon emissions: the mediating effect of industrial structure upgrading," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Pedersen, Lasse Heje & Fitzgibbons, Shaun & Pomorski, Lukasz, 2021. "Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 572-597.
    10. Xin Pan & Xuanjin Chen & Paresha Sinha & Niannian Dong, 2020. "Are firms with state ownership greener? An institutional complexity view," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 197-211, January.
    11. Jean‐Jacques Rosa & Edouard Pérard, 2010. "When to privatize? When to nationalize? A competition for ownership approach," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 110-132, February.
    12. James J. Cordeiro & Ambra Galeazzo & Tara Shankar Shaw & Rajaram Veliyath & M. K. Nandakumar, 2018. "Ownership influences on corporate social responsibility in the Indian context," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1107-1136, December.
    13. Luc Laeven & Ross Levine, 2008. "Complex Ownership Structures and Corporate Valuations," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 579-604, April.
    14. Chen Hu & Yanan Li & Penghao Ye, 2023. "The Halo Effect of Government: Does State-Owned Capital Promote the Green Innovation of Chinese Private Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Xu, Kefan & Yuan, Peng & Yu, Renjie, 2025. "The effects of mixed ownership reforms on Chinese firms’ emissions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 191-209.
    16. Xingquan Yang & Kexin Zhang & Pengfei Gao & Zheng Yang, 2025. "State-owned shareholders’ participation and environmental, social, and governance performance of private firms: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(26), pages 3503-3524, June.
    17. Xinru Li & Zengrui Tian & Qian Liu & Beiquan Chang, 2025. "The Impact and Mechanisms of State-Owned Shareholding on Greenwashing Behaviors in Chinese A-Share Private Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Larelle Chapple & Peter M. Clarkson & Daniel L. Gold, 2013. "The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme ( ETS )," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 49(1), pages 1-33, March.
    19. Wang, Bangjun & Ji, Feng & Zheng, Jie & Xie, Kejia & Feng, Zhaolei, 2021. "Carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power supply chain enterprises under the revenue sharing contract: Perspective of coordination game," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Na Yang & Jue Wang & Xiaming Liu & Lingyun Huang, 2022. "Home-country institutions and corporate social responsibility of emerging economy multinational enterprises: The belt and road initiative as an example," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 927-965, September.
    2. Wei Wang & Shi Liang & Ruichao Yu & Yumin Su, 2022. "Theoretical Evidence for Green Innovation Driven by Multiple Major Shareholders: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Yang, Na & Zhang, Yuan & Yu, Lu & Wang, Jue & Liu, Xiaming, 2022. "Cross-border mergers and acquisitions, regional cultural diversity and acquirers’ corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China listed companies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 565-578.
    4. Rahul Singh Gautam & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Shailesh Rastogi & Jyoti Mehndiratta Kappal & Hitesh Patole & Aman Pushp, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility Funding and Its Impact on India’s Sustainable Development: Using the Poverty Score as a Moderator," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Monika Dahiya & Shveta Singh & Neeru Chaudhry, 2024. "Unveiling the role of corporate social responsibility on the efficiency of capital investments and their speed of adjustment: Insights from India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 1963-1988, December.
    6. Wu, Xiaojuan & Dluhošová, Dana & Zmeškal, Zdeněk, 2023. "The moderating role of a corporate life cycle with the impact of economic value-added on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China's listed companies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. K. V. Mukundhan & Sreevas Sahasranamam & James J. Cordeiro, 2019. "Corporate investments in tax havens: evidence from India," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(5), pages 360-388, November.
    8. Alberto Citterio & Rossella Locatelli & Andrea Uselli, 2024. "Mapping Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: A Bibliometric Review across Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Li, Jian & Zhao, Yueru & Yao, Nengzhi & Guo, Qiaozhe & Zhao, Lexin, 2025. "The role of party embeddedness in environmental governance of Chinese firms: An institutional perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Anjali Kaimal & Shigufta Hena Uzma, 2024. "CSR and ownership structure: Moderating role of board characteristics in an emerging country context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4933-4955, September.
    11. Neha Rajput & Hansdeep Kaur, 2025. "Stakeholder pressure and sustainable environmental management practices in India: the moderating role of firm characteristics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1013-1028, September.
    12. Domenico Rocco Cambrea & Francesco Paolone & Nicola Cucari, 2023. "Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4299-4314, November.
    13. Sreevas Sahasranamam & Bindu Arya & Mukesh Sud, 2020. "Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1165-1192, December.
    14. Kalpana Tokas & Kartik Yadav, 2023. "Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1302-1325, December.
    15. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. James J. Cordeiro & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2020. "Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1127-1144, March.
    17. Shuna Shu Ham Ho & Chang Hoon Oh & Daniel Shapiro, 2024. "Can Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Social License? A Sentiment and Emotion Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 445-476, March.
    18. Shirodkar, Vikrant & Nayyar, Rishika & Sinha, Paresha, 2025. "When do firms overspend on CSR? The impacts of foreignness and institutional distance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1).
    19. Anna Jessop & Nicole Wilson & Michal Bardecki & Cory Searcy, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Disclosure in India: An Analysis of Multinational and Domestic Agrochemical Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-33, September.
    20. James J. Cordeiro & Ambra Galeazzo & Tara Shankar Shaw, 2023. "The CSR–CFP relationship in the presence of institutional voids and the moderating role of family ownership," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 137-163, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7433-:d:1726297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.