IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5331-d1675137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Impact of Fintech on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from 286 Prefecture-Level Cities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjing Li

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China
    Hubei Modern Textile Industry Economic Research Center, Wuhan 430200, China)

  • Dan Tong

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China
    Hubei Modern Textile Industry Economic Research Center, Wuhan 430200, China)

  • Hong Sun

    (School of Economics, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China
    Hubei Modern Textile Industry Economic Research Center, Wuhan 430200, China)

Abstract

While fintech offers new pathways for carbon emission reduction, its underlying mechanisms and regional disparities remain underexplored. Unlike prior studies, this study systematically examines the heterogeneous impact of fintech on carbon emissions by integrating geographic, regulatory, and developmental dimensions, while uncovering the counteracting “rebound effect” of technological innovation. Based on panel data from 286 prefecture-level cities in China (2010–2021), this study employs instrumental variable approaches and interaction effect models to examine the regional heterogeneity and underlying mechanisms of fintech’s carbon-emission-reduction effects. The results are as follows: (1) Fintech development demonstrates a statistically significant negative correlation with carbon emissions, confirming its emission-reduction potential; (2) The emission-reduction effects of fintech demonstrate substantial regional heterogeneity, with particularly pronounced impacts observed in eastern and western regions, smaller-sized cities, and areas with relatively lenient environmental regulations; (3) Fintech effectively curbs carbon emissions by optimizing industrial structure and improving energy efficiency. However, technological innovation exhibits a significant “rebound effect” that undermines fintech’s emission-reduction efficacy. This adverse impact is most evident during the nascent stage of fintech development and in non-resource-based cities. Policymakers should adopt region-specific strategies to align fintech with low-carbon industries while introducing carbon impact assessments for innovations to counteract rebound effects and maximize fintech’s emission-reduction potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjing Li & Dan Tong & Hong Sun, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Fintech on Carbon Emissions: Empirical Evidence from 286 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5331-:d:1675137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    2. Sadorsky, Perry, 2010. "The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2528-2535, May.
    3. Sorrell, Steve, 2009. "Jevons' Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1456-1469, April.
    4. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Kumar Tiwari, Aviral & Nasir, Muhammad, 2013. "The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1452-1459.
    5. Kumar, Santosh & Sen, Roshmi, 2025. "Are larger or denser cities more emission efficient? Exploring the nexus between urban household carbon emission, population size and density," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PB).
    6. York, Richard & Rosa, Eugene A. & Dietz, Thomas, 2003. "STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 351-365, October.
    7. Wei Xiong & Danping Liu & Zizi Li & Qiaoyi Wang & Shibin Yao, 2024. "How Does Ant Forest Influence Low Carbon Consumption Behavior: An Analysis Based on the S-O-R Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Runsen Yuan & Yan Li & Chunling Li & Xiaoran Sun & Lingyi Li, 2025. "The Impact of State-Owned Capital Participation on Carbon Emission Reduction in Private Enterprises: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-39, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang, Yitian & Cui, Haotian & Bi, Yunxiao, 2023. "The impact and channel effects of banking competition and government intervention on carbon emissions: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Muhammad Shahbaz & Avik Sinha, 2019. "Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2emissions: a literature survey," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 106-168, January.
    3. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Sinha, Avik, 2019. "Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: A survey of empirical literature," MPRA Paper 100257, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    4. Chukwuemeka Chinonso Emenekwe & Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke & Chinedum Uzoma Nwajiuba & Ifeoma Quinette Anugwa & Obioma Uchenna Emenekwe, 2025. "Determinants of consumption-based and production-based carbon emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 10303-10339, May.
    5. Isaac K. Ofori & Francesco Figari & Nathanael Ojong, 2023. "Towards sustainability: The relationship between foreign direct investment, economic freedom and inclusive green growth," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 23/023, African Governance and Development Institute..
    6. Keyi Duan & Mingyao Cao & Nurhafiza Abdul Kader Malim & Yan Song, 2022. "Nonlinear Relationship between Financial Development and CO 2 Emissions—Based on a PSTR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Ofori, Isaac K. & Figari, Francesco & Ojong, Nathanael, 2023. "Towards sustainability: The relationship between foreign direct investment, economic freedom and inclusive green growth," MPRA Paper 116956, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Xueyang Liu & Xiaoxing Liu, 2021. "Can Financial Development Curb Carbon Emissions? Empirical Test Based on Spatial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Marc Audi & Marc Poulin & Khalil Ahmad & Amjad Ali, 2025. "Modeling Disaggregate Globalization to Carbon Emissions in BRICS: A Panel Quantile Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Bo Yang & Minhaj Ali & Shujahat Haider Hashmi & Mohsin Shabir, 2020. "Income Inequality and CO 2 Emissions in Developing Countries: The Moderating Role of Financial Instability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasir, Muhammad Ali & Roubaud, David, 2018. "Environmental degradation in France: The effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 843-857.
    12. Ahmed, Khalid, 2017. "Revisiting the role of financial development for energy-growth-trade nexus in BRICS economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 487-495.
    13. Ye-Ning Wang & Qiang Zhou & Hao-Wei Wang, 2020. "Assessing Ecological Carrying Capacity in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Based on a Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Jamal Sekali & Mohamed Bouzahzah, 2019. "Financial Development and Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence for Morocco," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 67-74.
    15. Omri, Anis & Daly, Saida & Rault, Christophe & Chaibi, Anissa, 2015. "Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: What causes what in MENA countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 242-252.
    16. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Ben Khediri, Karim, 2016. "Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: Cointegration with structural breaks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1322-1335.
    17. Paul Welfens & Christian Lutz, 2012. "Green ICT dynamics: key issues and findings for Germany," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 24(2), pages 155-163, June.
    18. Rana Muhammad Adeel-Farooq & Jimoh Olajide Raji & Ghulam Muhmmad Qamri, 2023. "Does financial development influence the overall natural environment? An environmental performance index (EPI) based insight from the ASEAN countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5123-5139, June.
    19. Wang, Shaojian & Zeng, Jingyuan & Liu, Xiaoping, 2019. "Examining the multiple impacts of technological progress on CO2 emissions in China: A panel quantile regression approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 140-150.
    20. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Seyi Saint Akadiri & Ilham Haouas & Husam Rjoub, 2023. "A Time-Varying Analysis between Financial Development and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the MINT countries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1207-1227, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5331-:d:1675137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.