IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6288-d1697912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Projected Urban Air Pollution in Riyadh Using CMIP6 and Bayesian Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Khadeijah Yahya Faqeih

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed Nejib El Melki

    (Higher School of Engineers of Medjezel Bab, Department of Mechanical and AgroIndustrial Engineering, University of Jandouba, Jendouba 8189, Tunisia)

  • Somayah Moshrif Alamri

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Afaf Rafi AlAmri

    (Department of Geography, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Maha Abdullah Aldubehi

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Eman Rafi Alamery

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and climate change pose significant challenges to air quality in arid metropolitan areas, with critical implications for public health and sustainable development. This study projects the evolution of air pollution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, through 2070 using an integrated modeling approach that combines CMIP6 climate projections with localized air quality data. We analyzed daily concentrations of major pollutants (SO 2 , NO 2 ) across 15 strategically selected monitoring stations representing diverse urban environments, including traffic corridors, residential areas, healthcare facilities, and semi-natural zones. Climate data from two Earth System Models (CNRM-ESM2-1 and MPI-ESM1.2) were bias-corrected and integrated with historical pollution measurements (2000–2015) using hierarchical Bayesian statistical modeling under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 emission scenarios. Our results revealed substantial deterioration in air quality, with projected increases of 80–130% for SO 2 and 45–55% for NO 2 concentrations by 2070 under high-emission scenarios. Spatial analysis demonstrated pronounced pollution gradients, with traffic corridors (Eastern Ring Road, Northern Ring Road, Southern Ring Road) and densely urbanized areas (King Fahad Road, Makkah Road) experiencing the most severe increases, exceeding WHO guidelines by factors of 2–3. Even semi-natural areas showed significant increases in pollution due to regional transport effects. The hierarchical Bayesian framework effectively quantified uncertainties while revealing consistent degradation trends across both climate models, with the MPI-ESM1.2 model showing a greater sensitivity to anthropogenic forcing. Future concentrations are projected to reach up to 70 μg m −3 for SO 2 and exceed 100 μg m −3 for NO 2 in heavily trafficked areas by 2070, representing 2–3 times the Traffic corridors showed concentration increases of 21–24% compared to historical baselines, with some stations (R5, R13, and R14) recording projected levels above 4.0 ppb for SO 2 under the SSP5-8.5 scenario. These findings highlight the urgent need for comprehensive emission reduction strategies, accelerated renewable energy transition, and reformed urban planning approaches in rapidly developing arid cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Khadeijah Yahya Faqeih & Mohamed Nejib El Melki & Somayah Moshrif Alamri & Afaf Rafi AlAmri & Maha Abdullah Aldubehi & Eman Rafi Alamery, 2025. "Projected Urban Air Pollution in Riyadh Using CMIP6 and Bayesian Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6288-:d:1697912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Detlef Vuuren & Elmar Kriegler & Brian O’Neill & Kristie Ebi & Keywan Riahi & Timothy Carter & Jae Edmonds & Stephane Hallegatte & Tom Kram & Ritu Mathur & Harald Winkler, 2014. "A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 373-386, February.
    2. Drew Shindell & Greg Faluvegi & Karl Seltzer & Cary Shindell, 2018. "Quantified, localized health benefits of accelerated carbon dioxide emissions reductions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 291-295, April.
    3. Brian O’Neill & Elmar Kriegler & Keywan Riahi & Kristie Ebi & Stephane Hallegatte & Timothy Carter & Ritu Mathur & Detlef Vuuren, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 387-400, February.
    4. Gavin Shaddick & Matthew L. Thomas & Amelia Green & Michael Brauer & Aaron van Donkelaar & Rick Burnett & Howard H. Chang & Aaron Cohen & Rita Van Dingenen & Carlos Dora & Sophie Gumy & Yang Liu & Ran, 2018. "Data integration model for air quality: a hierarchical approach to the global estimation of exposures to ambient air pollution," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(1), pages 231-253, January.
    5. Shaykhah Mohammed Alajizah & Hamad Ahmed Altuwaijri, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Urban Expansion on the Urban Environment in Riyadh City (2000–2022) Using Geospatial Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Kristie Ebi & Stephane Hallegatte & Tom Kram & Nigel Arnell & Timothy Carter & Jae Edmonds & Elmar Kriegler & Ritu Mathur & Brian O’Neill & Keywan Riahi & Harald Winkler & Detlef Vuuren & Timm Zwickel, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 363-372, February.
    7. J. Lelieveld & J. S. Evans & M. Fnais & D. Giannadaki & A. Pozzer, 2015. "The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7569), pages 367-371, September.
    8. Badr H. Alharbi & Hatem A. Alhazmi & Zaid M. Aldhafeeri, 2022. "Air Quality of Work, Residential, and Traffic Areas during the COVID-19 Lockdown with Insights to Improve Air Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Elmar Kriegler & Jae Edmonds & Stéphane Hallegatte & Kristie Ebi & Tom Kram & Keywan Riahi & Harald Winkler & Detlef Vuuren, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 401-414, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lanzi, Elisa & Dellink, Rob & Chateau, Jean, 2018. "The sectoral and regional economic consequences of outdoor air pollution to 2060," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 89-113.
    2. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    3. Lamperti, Francesco & Bosetti, Valentina & Roventini, Andrea & Tavoni, Massimo & Treibich, Tania, 2021. "Three green financial policies to address climate risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Solberg, Birger & Moiseyev, Alex & Hansen, Jon Øvrum & Horn, Svein Jarle & Øverland, Margareth, 2021. "Wood for food: Economic impacts of sustainable use of forest biomass for salmon feed production in Norway," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Speers, Ann E. & Besedin, Elena Y. & Palardy, James E. & Moore, Chris, 2016. "Impacts of climate change and ocean acidification on coral reef fisheries: An integrated ecological–economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 33-43.
    6. Kalkuhl, Matthias & Wenz, Leonie, 2020. "The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. McManamay, Ryan A. & DeRolph, Christopher R. & Surendran-Nair, Sujithkumar & Allen-Dumas, Melissa, 2019. "Spatially explicit land-energy-water future scenarios for cities: Guiding infrastructure transitions for urban sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 880-900.
    8. Richard Taylor & Ruth Butterfield & Tiago Capela Lourenço & Adis Dzebo & Henrik Carlsen & Richard J. T. Klein, 2020. "Surveying perceptions and practices of high-end climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 65-87, July.
    9. Roson, Roberto & Damania, Richard, 2016. "Simulating the Macroeconomic Impact of Future Water Scarcity an Assessment of Alternative Scenarios," Conference papers 332687, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Phetheet, Jirapat & Hill, Mary C. & Barron, Robert W. & Gray, Benjamin J. & Wu, Hongyu & Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Heger, Wade & Kisekka, Isaya & Golden, Bill & Rossi, Matthew W., 2021. "Relating agriculture, energy, and water decisions to farm incomes and climate projections using two freeware programs, FEWCalc and DSSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Milan Ščasný & Emanuele Massetti & Jan Melichar & Samuel Carrara, 2015. "Quantifying the Ancillary Benefits of the Representative Concentration Pathways on Air Quality in Europe," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(2), pages 383-415, October.
    12. Coppens, Léo & Venmans, Frank, 2025. "The welfare properties of climate targets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Enrica De Cian & Ian Sue Wing, 2016. "Global Energy Demand in a Warming Climate," Working Papers 2016.16, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    14. Tom Wilson & Irina Grossman & Monica Alexander & Phil Rees & Jeromey Temple, 2022. "Methods for Small Area Population Forecasts: State-of-the-Art and Research Needs," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 865-898, June.
    15. Victor Nechifor & Matthew Winning, 2017. "The impacts of higher CO2 concentrations over global crop production and irrigation water requirements," EcoMod2017 10487, EcoMod.
    16. Dugan, Anna & Mayer, Jakob & Thaller, Annina & Bachner, Gabriel & Steininger, Karl W., 2022. "Developing policy packages for low-carbon passenger transport: A mixed methods analysis of trade-offs and synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Fabien Cremona & Sirje Vilbaste & Raoul-Marie Couture & Peeter Nõges & Tiina Nõges, 2017. "Is the future of large shallow lakes blue-green? Comparing the response of a catchment-lake model chain to climate predictions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 347-361, March.
    18. Govorukha, Kristina & Mayer, Philip & Rübbelke, Dirk & Vögele, Stefan, 2020. "Economic disruptions in long-term energy scenarios – Implications for designing energy policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    19. Sferra, Fabio & Krapp, Mario & Roming, Niklas & Schaeffer, Michiel & Malik, Aman & Hare, Bill & Brecha, Robert, 2019. "Towards optimal 1.5° and 2 °C emission pathways for individual countries: A Finland case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Ramon Key & Ramiro Parrado & Elisa Delpiazzo & Richard King & Francesco Bosello, 2024. "Potential climate-induced impacts on trade: the case of agricultural commodities and maritime chokepoints," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6288-:d:1697912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.