IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5995-d1690866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Certification for Solar Panel Reuse: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sector Practices and Gaps

Author

Listed:
  • Ishika Chhillar

    (UniSA Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia)

  • Sukhbir Sandhu

    (UniSA Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia)

  • Subhadarsini Parida

    (UniSA Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia)

  • Peter Majewski

    (Equals International, Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia)

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the development of a conceptual certification framework for solar panel reuse, positioned within the broader context of the circular economy. It emphasizes sustainable production and consumption in response to the climate crisis and resource depletion. This review was conducted using Scopus and Google Scholar, following a structured search strategy. A final set of 63 sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and gray literature recommended by domain experts, were selected to analyze existing certification frameworks across various sectors, focusing on their relevance to solar panel reuse. Key aspects of product reuse such as safety, quality, and technical standards are explored, highlighting the unique challenges associated with the long lifespans and environmental exposure of solar panels. Through this analysis, this study reveals the core elements vital for an effective certification framework. While structured certification frameworks are essential for sustainability, empirical evidence on their effectiveness in the solar panel reuse remains scarce, and regulatory inconsistencies add complexity. Using established practices in electronics, batteries, and other high-liability sectors as an anchor, the proposed framework, emerging from this systematic review, aims to extend solar panels’ lifecycle, contributing to environmental sustainability and socio-economic equity. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers by addressing key certification gaps and identifying future research directions in solar panel reuse standardization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ishika Chhillar & Sukhbir Sandhu & Subhadarsini Parida & Peter Majewski, 2025. "Certification for Solar Panel Reuse: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sector Practices and Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5995-:d:1690866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gur, K. & Chatzikyriakou, D. & Baschet, C. & Salomon, M., 2018. "The reuse of electrified vehicle batteries as a means of integrating renewable energy into the European electricity grid: A policy and market analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 535-545.
    2. Bressanelli, Gianmarco & Visintin, Filippo & Saccani, Nicola, 2022. "Circular Economy and the evolution of industrial districts: a supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Lo, Hui-Chiung & Yu, Rouh-Yun, 2013. "A study of quality management strategy for reused products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 172-177.
    4. Yao Chen & Fangruo Chen, 2019. "On the Competition between Two Modes of Product Recovery: Remanufacturing and Refurbishing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 2983-3001, December.
    5. Cheng, Ming & Zhang, Xuan & Ran, Aihua & Wei, Guodan & Sun, Hongbin, 2023. "Optimal dispatch approach for second-life batteries considering degradation with online SoH estimation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Braco, Elisa & San Martín, Idoia & Sanchis, Pablo & Ursúa, Alfredo & Stroe, Daniel-Ioan, 2022. "State of health estimation of second-life lithium-ion batteries under real profile operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    7. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Maria A. Franco & Stefan N. Groesser, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Solar Photovoltaic Value Chain for a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-35, August.
    9. Murthy, D. N. P. & Solem, O. & Roren, T., 2004. "Product warranty logistics: Issues and challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 110-126, July.
    10. Polzin, Friedemann & von Flotow, Paschen & Klerkx, Laurens, 2016. "Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: Exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 34-46.
    11. Hua Song & Huaizhi Chen & Yanbo Wang & Xiang-E Sun, 2024. "An Overview About Second-Life Battery Utilization for Energy Storage: Key Challenges and Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-26, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashayeri, Jalal & Ma, Ning & Sotirov, Renata, 2015. "The redesign of a warranty distribution network with recovery processes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 184-197.
    2. Pokharel, Shaligram & Mutha, Akshay, 2009. "Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 175-182.
    3. Ali Hassan & Guilherme Vieira Hollweg & Wencong Su & Xuan Zhou & Mengqi Wang, 2025. "Degradation-Aware Bi-Level Optimization of Second-Life Battery Energy Storage System Considering Demand Charge Reduction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Ma, N., 2014. "Optimal scope of supply chain network & operations design," Other publications TiSEM e6187708-b664-44bf-aef8-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Yang, Y. & Lin, J. & Hedenstierna, C.P.T. & Zhou, L., 2023. "The more the better? The impact of the number and location of product recovery options on the system dynamics in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    7. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    8. Dombi, József & Jónás, Tamás & Tóth, Zsuzsanna Eszter, 2018. "Modeling and long-term forecasting demand in spare parts logistics businesses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 1-17.
    9. Zhiguo Wang & Lufei Huang & Cici Xiao He, 2021. "A multi-objective and multi-period optimization model for urban healthcare waste’s reverse logistics network design," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 785-812, November.
    10. Metin Türkay & Öztürk Saraçoğlu & Mehmet Can Arslan, 2016. "Sustainability in Supply Chain Management: Aggregate Planning from Sustainability Perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Chen, Jiguang & Hu, Qiying, 2015. "Optimal payment scheme when the supplier’s quality level and cost are unknown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 731-742.
    12. Gregory A. DeCroix & Jing-Sheng Song & Paul H. Zipkin, 2009. "Managing an Assemble-to-Order System with Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 144-159, October.
    13. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Yu, Xinhu, 2024. "Purchasing new for remanufacturing: Sourcing co-opetition, tax-planning and data validation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    14. Gu, Xubo & Bai, Hanyu & Cui, Xiaofan & Zhu, Juner & Zhuang, Weichao & Li, Zhaojian & Hu, Xiaosong & Song, Ziyou, 2024. "Challenges and opportunities for second-life batteries: Key technologies and economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Deishin Lee, 2012. "Turning Waste into By-Product," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 115-127, January.
    16. Long He & Ying Rong & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Product Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, January.
    17. Dai, Houde & Wang, Jiaxin & Huang, Yiyang & Lai, Yuan & Zhu, Liqi, 2024. "Lightweight state-of-health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on statistical feature optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Jackson, Canek & Pascual, Rodrigo, 2008. "Optimal maintenance service contract negotiation with aging equipment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 387-398, September.
    19. Ying, Ying & Wang, Shixiang & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Make bricks without straw: Eco-innovation for resource-constrained firms in emerging markets," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5995-:d:1690866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.