IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5752-d1685101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Cognitive Chief Executive Officers Revitalize Social and Environmental Performance? Assessing the Relation Under the Aegis of Innovation, the Moderating Role of Supervisors and Cash Holdings

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaping Wang

    (School of Politics and Law, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China)

  • Dongling Wang

    (School of Business, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Syed Ghulam Meran Shah

    (School of Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration, University of Castilla La Mancha, 16002 Cuenca, Spain)

  • Anca Draghici

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300191 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Valentina Taucean

    (Faculty of Management in Production and Transportation, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300191 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The objective of the study is to demonstrate how cognitive chief executive officers (CEOs) influence corporate social and environmental performance under the moderating impact of innovation, supervisors and cash holdings. Significantly, we have formulated cognitive CEOs using data envelope analysis while considering the specific attributes of the incumbent CEO (by considering the age, tenure, goodwill, education and tacit knowledge of CEOs). The research approach aims to elucidate that cognitive CEOs strongly invigorate social and environmental performance. However, the moderating role of corporate innovation weakens this connection, whereas the moderating role of supervisors invigorates this relationship. In contrast, cash hoarding deters social and environmental performance through its moderating effectiveness. Conclusively, theoretical contribution illuminates the stakeholder theory frame of reference while emphasizing the identification of corporate social and environmental performance. Specifically, the role of cognitive CEOs has been signified as a promoter of such strategies, which indicate their orientation toward social responsibility. Empirical underpinnings illustrate the impact of corporate innovation, supervisors and cash holdings, which asymmetrically influence social and environmental performance. The recommendations of the research results refer to the characterization of the optimal attributes of cognitive CEOs that are essential to enhance social and environmental performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaping Wang & Dongling Wang & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Anca Draghici & Valentina Taucean, 2025. "Can Cognitive Chief Executive Officers Revitalize Social and Environmental Performance? Assessing the Relation Under the Aegis of Innovation, the Moderating Role of Supervisors and Cash Holdings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5752-:d:1685101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhifeng Shen & Ahsan Siraj & Hongbing Jiang & Yongming Zhu & Junjie Li, 2020. "Chinese-Style Innovation and Its International Repercussions in the New Economic Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Gerda Barauskaite & Dalia Streimikiene, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 278-287, January.
    3. Ran, Guanggui & Fang, Qiaoling & Luo, Shuai & Chan, Kam C., 2015. "Supervisory board characteristics and accounting information quality: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 18-32.
    4. Xu, Nianhang & Chen, Qinyuan & Xu, Yan & Chan, Kam C., 2016. "Political uncertainty and cash holdings: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 276-295.
    5. Yasir Shahab & Collins G. Ntim & Ye Chengang & Farid Ullah & Samuel Fosu, 2018. "Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1635-1652, December.
    6. Mohamed Arouri & Guillaume Pijourlet, 2017. "CSR Performance and the Value of Cash Holdings: International Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 263-284, January.
    7. Wu, Huiying & Li, Sihai & Ying, Sammy Xiaoyan & Chen, Xuan, 2018. "Politically connected CEOs, firm performance, and CEO pay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 169-180.
    8. Eugenio Zubeltzu‐Jaka & Igor Álvarez‐Etxeberria & Eduardo Ortas, 2020. "The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta‐analytic approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1361-1374, May.
    9. Qinghua Zhu & Fei Zou & Pan Zhang, 2019. "The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium‐sized suppliers in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 341-350, March.
    10. Vivian W. Fang & Xuan Tian & Sheri Tice, 2014. "Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2085-2125, October.
    11. Wei Jiang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Chuang Zhang, 2020. "Stakeholder Relationship Capability and Firm Innovation: A Contingent Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 111-125, November.
    12. Wang, Fang & Chen, Kaihua, 2020. "Do product imitation and innovation require different patterns of organizational innovation? Evidence from Chinese firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 60-74.
    13. Tong, Tong & Chen, Xiaoyue & Singh, Tarlok & Li, Bin, 2022. "Corporate governance and the outward foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 962-980.
    14. Chaminda Wijethilake & Tek Lama, 2019. "Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 143-154, January.
    15. Lars Helge Haß & Sofia Johan & Denis Schweizer, 2016. "Is Corporate Governance in China Related to Performance Persistence?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 575-592, April.
    16. Nurlan Orazalin, 2020. "Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 140-153, January.
    17. Xiaojuan Wu & Patrycja Hąbek, 2021. "Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Case of Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Rama Iyer, Subramanian & Sankaran, Harikumar & Walsh, Steve T., 2020. "Influence of Director Expertise on Capital Structure and Cash Holdings in High-Tech Firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu, 2021. "Assessing the interrelationship corporate environmental responsibility, innovative strategies, cognitive and hierarchical CEO: A stakeholder theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 457-473, January.
    20. Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Mingfeng Tang & Muddassar Sarfraz & Zeeshan Fareed, 2019. "The aftermath of CEO succession via hierarchical jumps on firm performance and agency cost: Evidence from Chinese firms," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(21), pages 1744-1748, December.
    21. Panern Intara & Nittikorn Suwansin, 2024. "Intangible assets, firm value, and performance: does intangible-intensive matter?," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2375341-237, December.
    22. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2020. "Political Connections and Firm Pollution Behaviour: An Empirical Study," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 867-898, April.
    23. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    24. Shui, Xiaolong & Zhang, Minhao & Smart, Palie & Ye, Fei, 2022. "Sustainable corporate governance for environmental innovation: A configurational analysis on board capital, CEO power and ownership structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 786-794.
    25. Jaemin Lim & Sang Cheol Lee, 2019. "Relationship Between the Characteristics of CEOs and Excess Cash Holdings of Firms," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 1069-1090, April.
    26. Joel Harper & Li Sun, 2020. "Environmental performance and corporate cash holdings," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(15), pages 1234-1237, September.
    27. Defeng Yang & Aric Xu Wang & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Wei Jiang, 2019. "Environmental Strategy, Institutional Force, and Innovation Capability: A Managerial Cognition Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1147-1161, November.
    28. Shuang Ren & Guiyao Tang & Susan E. Jackson, 2020. "Effects of Green HRM and CEO ethical leadership on organizations' environmental performance," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(6), pages 961-983, April.
    29. Mun, Seongjae & Han, Seung Hun & Seo, Dongwook, 2020. "The impact of CEO educational background on corporate cash holdings and value of excess cash," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    30. Muhammad Atif & Benjamin Liu & Sivathaasan Nadarajah, 2022. "The effect of corporate environmental, social and governance disclosure on cash holdings: Life‐cycle perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2193-2212, July.
    31. Bu, Maoliang & Qiao, Zhenzi & Liu, Beibei, 2020. "Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 10-18.
    32. Fei Xu & Mian Yang & Qiangyi Li & Xiaolei Yang, 2020. "Long‐term economic consequences of corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from heavily polluting listed companies in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2251-2264, September.
    33. Rachel Bocquet & Christian Le Bas & Caroline Mothe & Nicolas Poussing, 2017. "CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 241-254, November.
    34. Riaz, Zahid & Ray, Pradeep & Ray, Sangeeta, 2022. "The impact of digitalisation on corporate governance in Australia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 410-424.
    35. Andreea N. Kiss & Dirk Libaers & Pamela S. Barr & Tang Wang & Miles A. Zachary, 2020. "CEO cognitive flexibility, information search, and organizational ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2200-2233, December.
    36. Durán, William Fernando & Aguado, David, 2022. "CEOs' managerial cognition and dynamic capabilities: a meta-analytical study from the microfoundations approach," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 451-479, May.
    37. Liu, Yu & Miletkov, Mihail K. & Wei, Zuobao & Yang, Tina, 2015. "Board independence and firm performance in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 223-244.
    38. Mikko Manner, 2010. "The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 53-72, June.
    39. Muddassar Sarfraz & Syed G. M. Shah & Zeeshan Fareed & Farrukh Shahzad, 2020. "Demonstrating the interconnection of hierarchical order disturbances in CEO succession with corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2956-2971, November.
    40. Yasir Shahab & Collins G. Ntim & Yugang Chen & Farid Ullah & Hai‐Xia Li & Zhiwei Ye, 2020. "Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, January.
    41. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2015. "Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 831-850, June.
    42. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas W. Rathgeber, 2019. "It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 257-273, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu, 2021. "Assessing the interrelationship corporate environmental responsibility, innovative strategies, cognitive and hierarchical CEO: A stakeholder theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 457-473, January.
    2. Dongling WANG & Syed Ghulam Meran SHAH & Lucian IoneI CIOCA & Jaffar ABBAS, 2025. "Vigorous Boards and Cash Hoarding: Deriving Moderating Effects of Green Innovation, Agency Costs, and Independent Directors via Moment Quantile Regression," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 146-164, April.
    3. Huang, Ruilei & Wei, Jiuchang, 2023. "Does CEOs’ green experience affect environmental corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 205-231.
    4. Muddassar Sarfraz & Wang Qun & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Zeeshan Fareed, 2019. "Do Hierarchical Jumps in CEO Succession Invigorate Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Qin, Chu & Zhang, Wenyao, 2023. "Top management team characteristics, technological innovation and firm's greenwashing: Evidence from China's heavy-polluting industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Douglas A. Adu & Antoinette Flynn & Colette Grey, 2022. "Executive compensation and sustainable business practices: The moderating role of sustainability‐based compensation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 698-736, March.
    7. Aurang Zeb & Irfan Ullah & Amjad Iqbal & Mohib Ur Rahman & Shahab Aziz, 2024. "CEO’s Science and Engineering Background and Green Innovation: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    8. Yingkai Tang & Aswad Akram & Lucian‐Ionel Cioca & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Muhammad Asim Ali Qureshi, 2021. "Whether an innovation act as a catalytic moderator between corporate social responsibility performance and stated owned and non‐state owned enterprises' performance or not? An evidence from Pakistani ," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1127-1141, May.
    9. Muddassar Sarfraz & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Larisa Ivascu & Muhammad Asim Ali Qureshi, 2022. "Explicating the impact of hierarchical CEO succession on small‐medium enterprises' performance and cash holdings," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2600-2614, April.
    10. Yaoxiaoxue Hong & Xianling Jiang & Beibei Shi & Chang Yu, 2022. "Do Fiscal Environmental Protection Expenditures Crowd Out Corporate Environmental Protection Investments?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Bablu Kumar Dhar & Iman Harymawan & Sabrina Maria Sarkar, 2022. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on financial expert CEOs' turnover in heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 701-711, May.
    12. Sarfraz Muddassar Zeeshan Fareed Muhammad Ateeq ur Rehman Adnan Maqbool Muhammad Asim Ali Qureshi, 2019. "Whether CEO Succession Via Hierarchical Jumps is Detrimental or Blessing in Disguise? Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 22(2), pages 23-41, November.
    13. Ullah, Farid & Jiang, Ping & Elamer, Ahmed A. & Owusu, Andrews, 2022. "Environmental performance and corporate innovation in China: The moderating impact of firm ownership," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Douglas A. Adu & Basil Al‐Najjar & Thitima Sitthipongpanich, 2022. "Executive compensation, environmental performance, and sustainable banking: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1439-1463, May.
    15. Hu, Liang & Chen, Shishuo, 2025. "Ownership types and corporate environmental investment: Contingent effects of institutional and corporate factors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Fareed, Zeeshan & Wang, Nianyong & Shahzad, Farrukh & Meran Shah, Syed Ghulam & Iqbal, Najaf & Zulfiqar, Bushra, 2022. "Does good board governance reduce idiosyncratic risk in emerging markets? Evidence from China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    18. Shahab, Yasir & Wang, Peng & Gull, Ammar Ali & Chen, Yugang & Ntim, Collins G., 2023. "Social trust and environmental performance in China: Does state ownership matter?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Richard M. Crossley & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim, 2021. "Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3740-3762, December.
    20. Karim Mahran & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2024. "Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and corporate environmental sustainability: A systematic literature review and avenues for future research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1977-2003, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5752-:d:1685101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.