IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3100-d1372242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in CEO Communication Strategies between High- and Low-Performing Firms in the Global Auto Parts Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Yunseok Hong

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)

  • Keuntae Cho

    (Department of Systems Management Engineering, Graduate School of Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study focuses on how global automotive suppliers manage innovation by analyzing keywords in CEO messages. Given that CEOs significantly shape innovation strategy, the intricate dynamics of open innovation and the role of CEO characteristics in its adoption warrant further investigation. Accordingly, the research unfolds in three stages: (1) extracting keywords related to innovation highlighted in CEO communications, (2) contrasting the deployment of these keywords between high-performing and low-performing companies, and (3) deciphering the nuances of innovation management by interpreting the underlying meaning and structure of these keywords. This comparative analysis between top and bottom performers underscores stark contrasts in keyword emphasis. Through eigenvector centrality, mapping open innovation’s success factors pinpointed provision of resources and governance as pivotal in top-performing firms. Notably, the preferred keywords among leading firms reflect their current challenges and innovative management direction. Thus, to embody agile and visionary leadership in open innovation, CEOs should strategically incorporate and highlight keywords aligned with critical factors of open innovation in their communications. These insights offer valuable benchmarks for less successful firms aiming to refine their approaches to innovation management, vision, and strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunseok Hong & Keuntae Cho, 2024. "Differences in CEO Communication Strategies between High- and Low-Performing Firms in the Global Auto Parts Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3100-:d:1372242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yun Gil Choi & Keun Tae Cho, 2020. "Analysis of Safety Management Characteristics Using Network Analysis of CEO Messages in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1504-1511, December.
    3. Feinerer, Ingo & Hornik, Kurt & Meyer, David, 2008. "Text Mining Infrastructure in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 25(i05).
    4. Frank Bournois & Sébastien Point, 2006. "A letter from the president: seduction, charm and obfuscation in French CEO letters," Post-Print hal-03871149, HAL.
    5. Mark A. Clatworthy & Michael John Jones, 2006. "Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman's statement," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(4), pages 493-511, July.
    6. Mark Clatworthy & Michael John Jones, 2001. "The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 311-326, August.
    7. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    8. Barkemeyer, Ralf & Comyns, Breeda & Figge, Frank & Napolitano, Giulio, 2014. "CEO statements in sustainability reports: Substantive information or background noise?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 241-257.
    9. Susan K. McEvily & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & John E. Prescott, 2004. "The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8‐9), pages 713-722, August.
    10. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1514-1514, December.
    11. Detelin S. Elenkov & William Judge & Peter Wright, 2005. "Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi‐cluster comparative study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 665-682, July.
    12. Yongkyu Choi & Keun Tae Cho, 2021. "Analysis of Environmental Management Characteristics Using Network Analysis of CEO Communication in the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Zahra, Shaker A. & Bogner, William C., 2000. "Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 135-173, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pandza, Krsto & Ellwood, Paul, 2013. "Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1112-1125.
    2. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    3. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    4. Wang, Chun-Ju & Wu, Lei-Yu, 2012. "Team member commitments and start-up competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 708-715.
    5. Hana Kim & Eungdo Kim, 2018. "How an Open Innovation Strategy for Commercialization Affects the Firm Performance of Korean Healthcare IT SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Tai-Young Kim & Jeroen G. Kuilman, 2013. "The Demography of Resources," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(7), pages 1155-1184, November.
    7. Patnaik, Swetketu & Munjal, Surender & Varma, Arup & Sinha, Sujay, 2022. "Extending the resource-based view through the lens of the institution-based view: A longitudinal case study of an Indian higher educational institution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 124-141.
    8. Jensen, Peter D. Ørberg, 2012. "A passage to India: A dual case study of activities, processes and resources in offshore outsourcing of advanced services," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 311-326.
    9. Knudsen, Eirik Sjåholm, 2019. "Bad weather ahead: Pre-recession characteristics and the severity of recession impact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 118-130.
    10. Clint Chadwick & Adina Dabu, 2009. "Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 253-272, February.
    11. Colombelli, Alessandra, 2014. "The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics on Firms Growth," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201412, University of Turin.
    12. Lippert, Inge, 2008. "Perspektivenverschiebungen in der Corporate Governance: Neuere Ansätze und Studien der Corporate-Governance-Forschung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya & Arvind Sahay & Arunaditya Sahay, 2022. "The Quest for Competitive Advantage: The Role of Technology Depth and Breadth at the Customer Interface," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 47(4), pages 274-287, December.
    14. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    15. Grillitsch, Markus & Nilsson , Magnus, 2013. "Technological competencies and firm performance: Analyzing the importance of internal and external competencies," Papers in Innovation Studies 2013/24, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    16. Jan-Erik Vahlne & Jan Johanson, 2017. "From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(9), pages 1087-1102, December.
    17. Jorge Vareda Gomes & Mário José Batista Romão, 2023. "Gaining a Competitive Advantage Through Benefits Management," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. J. Nils Foege & Erk P. Piening & Torsten-Oliver Salge, 2017. "Don’T Get Caught On The Wrong Foot: A Resource-Based Perspective On Imitation Threats In Innovation Partnerships," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-42, April.
    20. Carayannopoulos, Sofy & Auster, Ellen R., 2010. "External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 254-267, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3100-:d:1372242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.