IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2956-d1368944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Roadmap for National Adoption of Blockchain Technology Towards Securing the Food System of Qatar

Author

Listed:
  • William George

    (College of Science and Engineering, Hamad bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar)

  • Tareq Al-Ansari

    (College of Science and Engineering, Hamad bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar)

Abstract

The national adoption of any technology involves the tight cooperation between the government and the key players involved in the sector of significance. This study highlights a road map toward blockchain technology (BCT) adoption and how it can catalyze better collaboration between the national authorities who play a vital role in securing food systems. The study discusses novel organizational and management concepts to blockchain-based digital governance and lays the foundation for future research. The methodology involves a combination of a systematic review and field research with officials of Qatar’s Food Security Program. As a result of analysing the case of Qatar, this paper analyzes the key features of both the BCT and the national food security goals of Qatar and investigates the technology–strategy fit. The outcomes include a blockchain collaboration matrix, “Technology Adoption and Stakeholder Effect” Matrix, and mapping the national strategies of Qatar Food Security to the capabilities of blockchain technology. Finally, this work concludes by providing concrete suggestions to help facilitate blockchain adoption within the national IT infrastructure, for better traceability and transparency in the food system.

Suggested Citation

  • William George & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2024. "Roadmap for National Adoption of Blockchain Technology Towards Securing the Food System of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2956-:d:1368944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cynthia Hardy & Nelson Phillips & Thomas B. Lawrence, 2003. "Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 321-347, March.
    2. Nelson Phillips & Thomas B. Lawrence & Cynthia Hardy, 2000. "Inter‐organizational Collaboration and the Dynamics of Institutional Fields," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-1, January.
    3. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    4. Mark L. Niebylski & Tammy Lu & Norm R. C. Campbell & Joanne Arcand & Alyssa Schermel & Diane Hua & Karen E. Yeates & Sheldon W. Tobe & Patrick A. Twohig & Mary R. L'Abbé & Peter P. Liu, 2014. "Healthy Food Procurement Policies and Their Impact," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Jiang Duan & Chen Zhang & Yu Gong & Steve Brown & Zhi Li, 2020. "A Content-Analysis Based Literature Review in Blockchain Adoption within Food Supply Chain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Aditi S. Saha & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2022. "Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Christine Göbel & Nina Langen & Antonia Blumenthal & Petra Teitscheid & Guido Ritter, 2015. "Cutting Food Waste through Cooperation along the Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Martine R. Haas & Morten T. Hansen, 2007. "Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(11), pages 1133-1153, November.
    9. Jane Dixon & Carol Richards, 2016. "On food security and alternative food networks: understanding and performing food security in the context of urban bias," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 191-202, March.
    10. Angelis, Jannis & Ribeiro da Silva, Elias, 2019. "Blockchain adoption: A value driver perspective," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 307-314.
    11. Marianne Hubeau & Fleur Marchand & Guido Van Huylenbroeck, 2017. "Sustainability Experiments in the Agri-Food System: Uncovering the Factors of New Governance and Collaboration Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    13. Aisha Bin Bishr, 2019. "Dubai: A City Powered by Blockchain," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 12(3-4), pages 4-8, Winter-Sp.
    14. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1972. "Factors affecting the diffusion of technology," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 3-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juha Halme, 2021. "The role of social capital in the institutionalization of regional place marketing activity," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(3), pages 249-256, September.
    2. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    3. Roxana Ologeanu-Taddei & David Morquin & Claudio Vitari, 2016. "Perceptions of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR): lessons from a French longitudinal survey," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923438, HAL.
    4. Gabriel JIPA, 2018. "Mobile Applications Buying Opinions Exploration using Topic Modeling," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(2), pages 44-55.
    5. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    6. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    7. Minseok Choi & Kyeongseok Han & Jeongil Choi, 2015. "The effects of product attributes and service quality of transportation card solutions on service user’s continuance and word-of-mouth intention," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(3), pages 463-490, September.
    8. Hoon S. Cha & Jong Hyun Wi & Chanhi Park & Taeha Kim, 2021. "Sustainability Calculus in Adopting Smart Speakers—Personalized Services and Privacy Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Johannes Putzke & Detlef Schoder & Kai Fischbach, 2010. "Adoption of Mass-Customized Newspapers: An Augmented Technology Acceptance Perspective," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 143-164.
    10. Yang-Chieh Chin, 2016. "Consumer Acceptance of Online Complaint Forms: An Integration of TPB, TAM and Values Perspective," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 265-279, December.
    11. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Ferguson, J.E. & Huysman, M.H., 2009. "Between ambition and approach: towards sustainable knowledge management in development organizations," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    13. Kathrin Dudenhöffer, 2013. "Why electric vehicles failed," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 95-124, July.
    14. John A. Aloysius & Hartmut Hoehle & Soheil Goodarzi & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2018. "Big data initiatives in retail environments: Linking service process perceptions to shopping outcomes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 25-51, November.
    15. Pythagoras N. Petratos & Alessio Faccia, 2023. "Fake news, misinformation, disinformation and supply chain risks and disruptions: risk management and resilience using blockchain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(2), pages 735-762, August.
    16. Wong, Alfred & Wei, Lu & Yang, Jie & Tjosvold, Dean, 2017. "Productivity and participation values for cooperative goals to limit free riding and promote performance in international joint ventures," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 819-830.
    17. Susmita Chatterjee & Bibek Ray Chaudhuri & Debabrata Dutta, 2019. "Determinants of Adoption of New Technology in Telecom Sector: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(1), pages 166-178, February.
    18. Oliver Michler & Reinhold Decker & Christian Stummer, 2020. "To trust or not to trust smart consumer products: a literature review of trust-building factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 391-420, August.
    19. Rolfsen Christian Nordahl & Lassen Ann Karina, 2020. "On-site inspections: the shift from forms to digital capture," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2064-2071, January.
    20. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2956-:d:1368944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.