IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7394-d1465459.html

The Effect of Carbon Trading Pilot Policy on Resource Allocation Efficiency: A Multiple Mediating Effect Model of Development, Innovation, and Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Shao

    (Scientific Research Management Department, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Debao Dai

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Yunqing Zhao

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Liang Ye

    (Office of Admissions and Career Services, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

This study extends the existing research on carbon trading policies from the perspective of mediating effects. Based on the difference-in-differences method, this study helps to understand the relationship between China’s carbon trading policies and resource allocation efficiency. The study finds that carbon trading policy promotes the optimization of capital allocation efficiency but does not promote the optimization of labor allocation efficiency. This conclusion has passed a series of robustness tests. Moreover, our analysis shows that carbon trading policies can influence resource allocation efficiency through per capita GDP, foreign direct investment, and innovation levels using multiple mediating models. Factors such as market size, the number of emission entities, and the behavior of market participants affect the resource allocation efficiency in the carbon trading process. Finally, the spatial spillover effect of the carbon trading policy is verified. This paper provides empirical evidence and policy implications for achieving the dual carbon goal and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Shao & Debao Dai & Yunqing Zhao & Liang Ye, 2024. "The Effect of Carbon Trading Pilot Policy on Resource Allocation Efficiency: A Multiple Mediating Effect Model of Development, Innovation, and Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7394-:d:1465459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7394/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7394/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Huaping & Edziah, Bless Kofi & Kporsu, Anthony Kwaku & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Wang, Shuhong & Zhao, Danqing & Chen, Hanxue, 2020. "Government corruption, resource misallocation, and ecological efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Hong, Qianqian & Cui, Linhao & Hong, Penghui, 2022. "The impact of carbon emissions trading on energy efficiency: Evidence from quasi-experiment in China's carbon emissions trading pilot," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Raphael Calel & Antoine Dechezleprêtre, 2016. "Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 98(1), pages 173-191, March.
    5. Bohringer, Christoph & Welsch, Heinz, 2004. "Contraction and Convergence of carbon emissions: an intertemporal multi-region CGE analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 21-39, January.
    6. Niklas Höhne & Matthew J. Gidden & Michel Elzen & Frederic Hans & Claire Fyson & Andreas Geiges & M. Louise Jeffery & Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga & Silke Mooldijk & William Hare & Joeri Rogelj, 2021. "Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(10), pages 820-822, October.
    7. Xie, Rui & Yao, Siling & Han, Feng & Zhang, Qi, 2022. "Does misallocation of land resources reduce urban green total factor productivity? An analysis of city-level panel data in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Teixidó, Jordi & Verde, Stefano F. & Nicolli, Francesco, 2019. "The impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on low-carbon technological change: The empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Wang, Bin & Yu, Minxiu & Zhu, Yucheng & Bao, Pinjuan, 2021. "Unveiling the driving factors of carbon emissions from industrial resource allocation in China: A spatial econometric perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Giovanni Marin & Marianna Marino & Claudia Pellegrin, 2018. "The Impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on Multiple Measures of Economic Performance," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(2), pages 551-582, October.
    11. Zhang, Wei & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Fanyong, 2022. "Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    12. Liu, Zheng & Huang, Yu-Qing & Shang, Wen-Long & Zhao, Yuan-Jun & Yang, Zao-Li & Zhao, Zhao, 2022. "Precooling energy and carbon emission reduction technology investment model in a fresh food cold chain based on a differential game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    13. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Liang, Ting & Jin, Yan-Lin & Shen, Bo, 2020. "The impact of carbon trading on economic output and carbon emissions reduction in China’s industrial sectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Feng Wang & Mingru Dong & Jing Ren & Shan Luo & Hui Zhao & Juan Liu, 2022. "The impact of urban spatial structure on air pollution: empirical evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5531-5550, April.
    15. Easwaran Narassimhan & Kelly S. Gallagher & Stefan Koester & Julio Rivera Alejo, 2018. "Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 967-991, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Su, Sanxin & Fan, Ruoshan, 2025. "Will Carbon Emission Trading Policy Affect China's Global Resource Allocation?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PE).
    2. Fan, Ruoshan & Su, Sanxin, 2025. "Comparison of industrial structure optimization paths under environmental regulation: efficiency improvement or structure improvement?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunqing Zhao & Debao Dai & Wei Shao & Liang Ye, 2024. "Can the Carbon Trading Policy Enhance Resource Allocation Efficiency?—An Analysis of the Synergistic Effect of Market Mechanism and Government Intervention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Bremer, Leon & Sommer, Konstantin, 2025. "Economic performance and investments under emissions trading: Untangling the effects of a staggered regulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Qiang Tu & Limei Zuo & Jianlei Mo & Yingnan Wang, 2026. "Carbon pricing, green innovation, and production efficiency—new evidence from China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1-32, March.
    4. Xiaoqi Li & Dingfei Guo & Chao Feng, 2022. "The Carbon Emissions Trading Policy of China: Does It Really Promote the Enterprises’ Green Technology Innovations?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Fanyong, 2022. "Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    6. Yu, Jian & Liu, Peng & Shi, Xunpeng & Ai, Xianneng, 2023. "China’s emissions trading scheme, firms’ R&D investment and emissions reduction," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1021-1037.
    7. Weng, Zhixiong & Liu, Tingting & Wu, Yufeng & Cheng, Cuiyun, 2022. "Air quality improvement effect and future contributions of carbon trading pilot programs in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Yumei Guan & Chiwei Su & Tao Guan, 2025. "The Dynamic Bidirectional Causality Between Carbon Pricing and Green Technology Innovation in China: A Sub-Sample Time-Varying Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Leon Bremer & Konstantin Sommer, 2022. "Competitiveness and investments under emissions trading," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-061/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Shi, Mengjie & Zhang, Yupu & Meinerding, Christoph, 2025. "The impact of climate policies on financial markets: Evidence from the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism," Discussion Papers 14/2025, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    11. Cui, Huanyu & Cao, Yuequn, 2023. "How can market-oriented environmental regulation improve urban energy efficiency? Evidence from quasi-experiment in China's SO2 trading emissions system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. Na Yu & Jianghua Chen & Lei Cheng, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction between Government and Enterprises under Carbon Quota Trading Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Liu, Guanchun & Zhang, Gaorong & Song, Malin & Fu, Shun, 2025. "Carbon emissions trading and corporate energy efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    14. Liu, Hongwei & Chen, Qiaoqiao & Song, Yanwu, 2025. "Does the carbon emissions trading scheme promote green technology innovation? New evidence from Chinese cities," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1045-1057.
    15. Sheng Xu & Wenran Pan & Demei Wen, 2023. "Do Carbon Emission Trading Schemes Promote the Green Transition of Enterprises? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Zhou, Anhua & Xin, Ling & Li, Jun, 2022. "Assessing the impact of the carbon market on the improvement of China's energy and carbon emission performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    17. Zhao, Tianzhen & Ke, Haiqian & Zhang, Ning, 2025. "Comparing the innovation impacts on firms: Pilot vs. National Carbon Emission Trading Schemes in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PB).
    18. Yang, Lisha & Li, Yutianhao & Liu, Hongxun, 2021. "Did carbon trade improve green production performance? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Liu, Yu & Tan, Xiu-Jie & Yu, Yang & Qi, Shao-Zhou, 2017. "Assessment of impacts of Hubei Pilot emission trading schemes in China – A CGE-analysis using TermCO2 model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 762-769.
    20. Liu, Shimeng & Xiong, Xiong & Gao, Ya, 2025. "Market-based environmental regulations and green innovation: Evidence from the pilot carbon markets in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7394-:d:1465459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.