IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6752-d1451511.html

Poverty in the Kazakhstan Regions: Assessing the Influence of Key Indicators on Differences in Its Level

Author

Listed:
  • Zaure Chulanova

    (Institute of Economics of SC MSHE RK, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Nursaule Brimbetova

    (Institute of Economics of SC MSHE RK, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Azimkhan Satybaldin

    (Institute of Economics of SC MSHE RK, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Aisulu Dzhanegizova

    (School of Business and Management, Qainar University, Almaty 050026, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Modern Kazakhstan is characterized by significant regional socioeconomic differences due to climatic conditions, natural resources, migration, and regional specialization. The persistence of these regional differences can lead to increased stratification of society, social tension, and disruption of the country’s economic stability. These issues have intensified under the influence of Industry 4.0 trends and geopolitical processes in the region. Among the various sources of social inequality, we have chosen to focus on the problem of population poverty in our study. Addressing this problem is crucial for taking a comprehensive approach to addressing regional disparities in social development. The purpose of our study is to determine and assess the features of poverty in the regions of Kazakhstan. Our research methodology is based on evaluating the integral poverty index using four indicators: the share of the population with incomes below the subsistence level, the population under 60 years of age, youth aged 15–17 who are not working or studying, and the unemployment rate in the regions of Kazakhstan. Based on these indicators, we grouped the regions according to their poverty level, identified and compared regional differences, and identified the most vulnerable areas in need of intervention. This approach has enabled us to propose appropriate instruments of state support for different territories and promote inclusive regional development to overcome social imbalances.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaure Chulanova & Nursaule Brimbetova & Azimkhan Satybaldin & Aisulu Dzhanegizova, 2024. "Poverty in the Kazakhstan Regions: Assessing the Influence of Key Indicators on Differences in Its Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6752-:d:1451511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6752/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6752/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maleva, Tatiana (Малева, Татьяна) & Grishina, Elena (Гришина, Елена) & Tsatsura, Elena (Цацура, Елена), 2019. "Long-term social policy: multidimensional poverty and effective targeting [Социальная Политика В Долгосрочной Перспективе: Многомерная Бедность И Эффективная Адресность]," Published Papers 021903, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    2. Atiqur Rahman & John Westley, 2001. "The Challenge of Ending Rural Poverty," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 553-562, December.
    3. Wojciech Kopczuk, 2015. "What Do We Know about the Evolution of Top Wealth Shares in the United States?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 47-66, Winter.
    4. Atkinson, Tony & Cantillon, Bea & Marlier, Eric & Nolan, Brian, 2002. "Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199253494.
    5. Sen, Amartya K, 1979. "Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What's Wrong with Welfare Economics?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(355), pages 537-558, September.
    6. Chrysa Leventi & Holly Sutherland & Iva Valentinova Tasseva, 2016. "Improving poverty reduction in Europe: what works (best) where?," ImPRovE Working Papers 16/16, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    7. Ms. Florence Jaumotte & Ms. Carolina Osorio-Buitron, 2015. "Inequality and Labor Market Institutions," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 2015/014, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Atkinson, A. B. & Piketty, Thomas (ed.), 2010. "Top Incomes: A Global Perspective," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199286898.
    9. Dirk Krueger & Fabrizio Perri, 2006. "Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory -super-1," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 73(1), pages 163-193.
    10. Florence Jaumotte & Carolina Osorio Buitron, 2015. "Inequality and Labor Market Institutions," IMF Staff Discussion Notes 15/14, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Hulya Dagdeviren & Rolph Van Der Hoeven & John Weeks, 2002. "Poverty Reduction with Growth and Redistribution," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 383-413, June.
    12. Gianni Betti & Güllü Çalik & Murat Karakaş, 2013. "Multidimensional and Fuzzy Measures of Poverty and Inequality in Turkey at National and Regional Level," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, in: Valerie Berenger & Florent Bresson (ed.), Poverty and Social Exclusion around the Mediterranean Sea, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 89-108, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aisulu Moldabekova & Azimkhan Satybaldin & Aida Omir & Erkin Sadykov & Aigul Beimisheva, 2025. "Household Deprivation in Kazakhstan: A Factor Analysis of Regional Disparities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian A. Belabed, 2016. "Inequality and the New Deal," IMK Working Paper 166-2016, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Matteo Coronese & Isabelle Salle, 2018. "The "Rajan Hypothesis": a counter-factual experiment," LEM Papers Series 2018/03, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    3. Nicolas Zorn & Olivier Jacques, 2017. "Under the Rising Wave. How Disaggregated Revenue Sources Can Tell Another Story for Québec’s Top Income Share," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 25(1), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Blotevogel, Robert & Imamoglu, Eslem & Moriyama, Kenji & Sarr, Babacar, 2022. "Income inequality measures and economic growth channels," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Christopher Hartwell, 2022. "Institutions and trade‐related inequality," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3246-3264, July.
    6. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/50jd34uldo9jioklc7b0dpu4ej is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Giovanni DOSI & Maria Enrica VIRGILLITO, 2019. "Whither the evolution of the contemporary social fabric? New technologies and old socio‐economic trends," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 158(4), pages 593-625, December.
    8. Salim Chahine & Adam Chahine, 2024. "COVID-19 Crisis and the Association Between Inequality and Economic Growth," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 36(2), pages 246-261, July.
    9. Dirk Bezemer & Anna Samarina, 2019. "Debt shift, financial development and income inequality," DNB Working Papers 646, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    10. Tonia NOVITZ, 2020. "Engagement with sustainability at the International Labour Organization and wider implications for collective worker voice," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(4), pages 463-482, December.
    11. Kaltenberg, Mary & Foster-McGregor, Neil, 2020. "The impact of automation on inequality across Europe," MERIT Working Papers 2020-009, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    12. Christoph Lakner & Branko Milanovic, 2016. "Global Income Distribution: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to the Great Recession," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 203-232.
    13. Behringer, Jan & Gechert, Sebastian & Horn, Gustav A. & Rietzler, Katja & Stein, Ulrike & Tiefensee, Anita, 2017. "Schriftliche Stellungnahme zur öffentlichen Anhörung des Sozialausschusses des Landtags Mecklenburg-Vorpommern am 29. November 2017 zum Thema "Armut und Reichtum" (Ausschussdrucksache 7/225)," WSI Policy Briefs 18, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    14. Mélanie Laroche & Frédéric Lauzon Duguay & Patrice Jalette, 2019. "When Collective Bargaining Leads to Inequality: Determinants of Two-Tier Provisions in Canadian Collective Agreements," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 72(4), pages 871-896, August.
    15. Ara Stepanyan & Jorge Salas, 2020. "Distributional Implications of Labor Market Reforms: Learning from Spain's Experience," IMF Working Papers 2020/029, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Walter Paternesi Meloni & Antonella Stirati, 2023. "The decoupling between labour compensation and productivity in high‐income countries: Why is the nexus broken?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 425-463, June.
    17. Contreras, Salvador & Ghosh, Amit & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2023. "The effect of bank failures on small business loans and income inequality," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Claire Lebarz, 2015. "Income Inequality and Household Debt Distribution: A Cross-Country Analysis using Wealth Surveys," LWS Working papers 20, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    19. Karsten Kohler & Alexander Guschanski & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2019. "The impact of financialisation on the wage share: a theoretical clarification and empirical test," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(4), pages 937-974.
    20. Jordan Jeffrey & Mathur Aparna & Munasib Abdul & Roy Devesh, 2021. "Did Right-To-Work Laws Impact Income Inequality? Evidence from U.S. States Using the Synthetic Control Method," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 45-81, January.
    21. Lorenzo Esposito & Lorenzo Marrese, 2021. "The impact of cognitive skills on investment decisions. An empirical assessment and policy suggestions," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0019, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6752-:d:1451511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.