IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p312-d1309787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart Sustainable Marketing and Emerging Technologies: Evidence from the Greek Business Market

Author

Listed:
  • Stavros Kalogiannidis

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51100 Grevena, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Kalfas

    (Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, 53100 Florina, Greece)

  • Efstratios Loizou

    (Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

  • Olympia Papaevangelou

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51100 Grevena, Greece)

  • Fotios Chatzitheodoridis

    (Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece)

Abstract

In the market-shaping literature, markets are viewed as the results of intentional and planned acts. Market shapers do not often create technology themselves despite the fact that technical advancements can hasten changes in smart sustainable marketing. This study assessed the development of emerging technologies in business informatics with a focus on smart sustainable marketing and its relevant emerging technologies. Data were collected using an online questionnaire from 320 marketing professionals in Greece. The study revealed that emerging technologies have a significant relationship with smart sustainable marketing. Drivers of smart sustainable marketing positively enhance the effectiveness of smart sustainable marketing, and innovations in business informatics have a positive effect on smart sustainable marketing. It is clear from our results that the area of emerging technologies and smart sustainable marketing has not received much attention since such developments depend on complementary technologies that make it possible for emerging methods or technologies to integrate resources and co-create value. This study conceptually distinguishes between technology as a market offering and technology as a business platform for market shaping and innovation. Managers in the business industry and elsewhere are urged by this research to more closely examine the development of ancillary technologies, which could serve as platforms for market innovation and market shaping. Discovering and taking advantage of these opportunities is crucial for success in smart sustainable marketing. This study also presents a significant addition to the academic community because of the empirical evidence on the relationships between business informatics, smart sustainable marketing, and new technology. In terms of technology, it expands the theoretical framework of market dynamics and offers a novel perspective on the ways in which technology influences the structure and sustainability of markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Stavros Kalogiannidis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Efstratios Loizou & Olympia Papaevangelou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2023. "Smart Sustainable Marketing and Emerging Technologies: Evidence from the Greek Business Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:312-:d:1309787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa Archpru Akaka & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 375-389, December.
    2. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Stamatis Kontsas, 2022. "The Impact of Digitalization in Supporting the Performance of Circular Economy: A Case Study of Greece," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Saeed Nosratabadi & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Andry Rakotonirainy & Kwok Wing Chau, 2019. "Sustainable Business Models: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Ekman, Peter & Röndell, Jimmie & Kowalkowski, Christian & Raggio, Randle D. & Thompson, Steven M., 2021. "Emergent market innovation: A longitudinal study of technology-driven capability development and institutional work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 469-482.
    5. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    6. Debora Sarno & Pierluigi Siano, 2022. "Exploring the Adoption of Service-Dominant Logic as an Integrative Framework for Assessing Energy Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Kaartemo, Valtteri & Nyström, Anna-Greta, 2021. "Emerging technology as a platform for market shaping and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 458-468.
    8. Papathanasiou, Angeliki & Cole, Rosanna & Murray, Philip, 2020. "The (non-)application of blockchain technology in the Greek shipping industry," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 927-938.
    9. Rikhardsson, Pall & Yigitbasioglu, Ogan, 2018. "Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 37-58.
    10. Blazquez, Desamparados & Domenech, Josep, 2018. "Big Data sources and methods for social and economic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 99-113.
    11. Dhruv Grewal & John Hulland & Praveen K. Kopalle & Elena Karahanna, 2020. "The future of technology and marketing: a multidisciplinary perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 1-8, January.
    12. Mohamad Reza Sanaei & Farzad Movahedi Sobhani, 2018. "Information technology and e-business marketing strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 185-196, September.
    13. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Dimitrios Kalfas & Stamatis Kontsas & Ermelinda Toska, 2022. "The Economic Impact of Russia s Ukraine Conflict on the EU Fuel Markets," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 37-49, November.
    14. Carlos Andrés Tavera Romero & Jesús Hamilton Ortiz & Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf & Andrea Ríos Prado, 2021. "Business Intelligence: Business Evolution after Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    16. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka, 2021. "Market-shaping: navigating multiple theoretical perspectives," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 336-353, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jadranka Musulin & Vjeran Strahonja, 2023. "User Experience, Business Models, and Service Design in Concert: Towards a General Methodological Framework for Value Proposition Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Stathakopoulos, Vlasis & Kottikas, Konstantinos G. & Painesis, Grigorios & Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Kottika, Efthymia, 2022. "Why shape a market? Empirical evidence on the prominent firm-level and market-level outcomes of market-driving strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1240-1254.
    3. Helkkula, Anu & Arnould, Eric J., 2022. "Using neo-animism to revisit actors for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in S-D logic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 860-868.
    4. Shelby D. Hunt & Sreedhar Madhavaram & Hunter N. Hatfield, 2022. "The marketing discipline’s troubled trajectory: The manifesto conversation, candidates for central focus, and prognosis for renewal," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(3), pages 139-156, December.
    5. Becker, Larissa & Karpen, Ingo Oswald & Kleinaltenkamp, Michael & Jaakkola, Elina & Helkkula, Anu & Nuutinen, Maaria, 2023. "Actor experience: Bridging individual and collective-level theorizing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Alnoor Bhimani, 2020. "Digital data and management accounting: why we need to rethink research methods," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 9-23, April.
    7. Lähteenmäki, Ilkka & Nätti, Satu & Saraniemi, Saila, 2022. "Digitalization-enabled evolution of customer value creation: An executive view in financial services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 504-517.
    8. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    9. Finsterwalder, Jörg, 2017. "Refugee influx: Repercussions and research agenda for service scholars," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 177-181.
    10. Krystyna Mazurek-Lopacinska & Magdalena Sobocinska, 2021. "Social Media in Marketing Activities of Enterprises in the Light of the Analysis of Empirical Research Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 647-658.
    11. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    12. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Business model innovation within SPOs: Exploring the antecedents and mechanisms facilitating multi-level value co-creation within a value-network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 475-494.
    13. Hongfeng Zhang & Xiangjiang Ding & Yue Liu, 2023. "The Impact of Low-Carbon Pilot Cities on the Development of Digital Economy: Empirical Evidence from 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Christian Bartelheimer, Philipp zur Heiden, Hedda Lüttenberg, Daniel Beverungen, 2021. "Systematizing the Lexicon of Platforms in Information Systems: A Data-Driven Study," Working Papers Dissertations 79, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    15. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    16. Anna Gerke & Herbert Woratschek & Geoff Dickson, 2020. "How is value co-created in a sportbusiness-to-business context?," Post-Print hal-02962015, HAL.
    17. da Silva, Agostinho & Almeida, Isabel, 2020. "Towards INDUSTRY 4.0 | a case STUDY in ornamental stone sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Long Qian & Yunjie Zhou & Ying Sun, 2023. "Regional Differences, Distribution Dynamics, and Convergence of the Green Total Factor Productivity of China’s Cities under the Dual Carbon Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Domenica Lavorato & Palmira Piedepalumbo, 2023. "How Smart Technologies Affect the Decision-Making and Control System of Food and Beverage Companies—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:312-:d:1309787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.