IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p178-d1306597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unintended Consequences of Antismoking Pricing Policies: Insights from Smokers’ Household Expenditure on Smoking Behavior and Public Health

Author

Listed:
  • Yael Kochan

    (The Department of Management, The Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva 8410501, Israel)

  • Stav Rosenzweig

    (The Department of Management, The Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva 8410501, Israel
    The Goldman Sonnenfeldt School of Sustainability and Climate Change, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva 8410501, Israel)

Abstract

Despite e-cigarettes’ increasing popularity, traditional cigarette smoking, particularly with roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco, persists as the predominant form of global tobacco consumption. We examine the effect of an antismoking pricing policy on smokers’ behavior by assessing changes in their households’ consumption of tobacco products. To do so, we use a pricing policy implemented in Israel that introduced significant tax increases on RYO tobacco and factory-made cigarettes as our research setting. We analyze data compiled by a national agency on 8000 households representing the smoking population, evaluating changes in smoking behavior through their expenditures on tobacco products. Our model assesses the policy’s impact on tobacco and cigarettes consumed, as well as the probability of households consuming these products. We find that the policy reduced neither overall tobacco consumption nor cigarettes smoked, contrary to expectations. Instead, it was associated with an increased likelihood of households choosing RYO cigarettes and the number of RYO cigarettes consumed. The study emphasizes that anti-smoking pricing policies may inadvertently promote RYO tobacco use, potentially harming public health. To mitigate this, we recommend designing price policies that eliminate perceived gaps between RYO tobacco and factory-made cigarettes. This approach can discourage substitution and foster the deconsumption of both products.

Suggested Citation

  • Yael Kochan & Stav Rosenzweig, 2023. "Unintended Consequences of Antismoking Pricing Policies: Insights from Smokers’ Household Expenditure on Smoking Behavior and Public Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:178-:d:1306597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carla J. Berg & Yael Bar-Zeev & Hagai Levine, 2020. "Informing iQOS Regulations in the United States: A Synthesis of What We Know," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    2. Su, Qing, 2012. "A quantile regression analysis of the rebound effect: Evidence from the 2009 National Household Transportation Survey in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 368-377.
    3. Siahpush, M. & Spittal, M. & Singh, G.K., 2007. "Association of smoking cessation with financial stress and material well-being: Results from a prospective study of a population-based national survey," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(12), pages 2281-2287.
    4. Steren, Aviv & Rubin, Ofir D. & Rosenzweig, Stav, 2016. "Assessing the rebound effect using a natural experiment setting: Evidence from the private transportation sector in Israel," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 41-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitropoulos, Alexandros & Oueslati, Walid & Sintek, Christina, 2018. "The rebound effect in road transport: A meta-analysis of empirical studies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 163-179.
    2. Mamkhezri, Jamal & Khezri, Mohsen, 2024. "Vehicle miles traveled induced demand, rebound effect, and price and income elasticities: A US spatial econometric analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 224-240.
    3. Jaraitė, Jūratė & Kurtyka, Oliwia & Ollivier, Hélène, 2022. "Take a ride on the (not so) green side: How do CDM projects affect Indian manufacturing firms’ environmental performance?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Biying Yu & Junyi Zhang & Akimasa Fujiwara, 2016. "Who rebounds in the private transport sector? A comparative analysis between Beijing and Tokyo," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(3), pages 561-579, May.
    5. Qing Su, 2017. "Travel Demand Management Policy Instruments, Urban Spatial Characteristics, and Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Travel in the US Urban Areas," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 157-166.
    6. Goetzke, Frank & Vance, Colin, 2018. "Is gasoline price elasticity in the United States increasing? Evidence from the 2009 and 2017 national household travel surveys," Ruhr Economic Papers 765, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    7. Ensieh Shojaeddini & Ben Gilbert, 2023. "Heterogeneity in the Rebound Effect: Evidence from Efficient Lighting Subsidies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 173-217, January.
    8. Schleich, Joachim & Klobasa, Marian & Gölz, Sebastian & Brunner, Marc, 2013. "Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand—Findings from a field trial in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1097-1106.
    9. Brown, Sarah & Gray, Daniel, 2016. "Household finances and well-being in Australia: An empirical analysis of comparison effects," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 17-36.
    10. Joshua O. Barker & Julia Vassey & Julia C. Chen-Sankey & Jon-Patrick Allem & Tess Boley Cruz & Jennifer B. Unger, 2021. "Categorizing IQOS-Related Twitter Discussions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-10, April.
    11. Han, Hongyun & Zhou, Zinan, 2024. "The rebound effect of energy consumption and its determinants in China's agricultural production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    12. Benita, Francisco, 2020. "Carpool to work: Determinants at the county-level in the United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Sylvain Weber & Mehdi Farsi, 2014. "Travel distance, fuel efficiency, and vehicle weight: An estimation of the rebound effect using individual data in Switzerland," IRENE Working Papers 14-03, IRENE Institute of Economic Research.
    14. Muhammad S. Tahir & Abdullahi D. Ahmed, 2021. "Australians’ Financial Wellbeing and Household Debt: A Panel Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Li, Aijun & Peng, Dan & Wang, Daoping & Yao, Xin, 2017. "Comparing regional effects of climate policies to promote non-fossil fuels in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1998-2012.
    16. Yu, Xuewei & Moreno-Cruz, Juan & Crittenden, John C., 2015. "Regional energy rebound effect: The impact of economy-wide and sector level energy efficiency improvement in Georgia, USA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 250-259.
    17. Matsushima, Hiroshi & Khanna, Madhu, 2022. "Estimating Medium-run Direct Rebound Effects of the Footprint-based CAFE Standard," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322420, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Sarah Brown & Daniel Gray, 2014. "Household Finances and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis of Comparison Effects," Working Papers 2014015, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
    19. Stapleton, Lee & Sorrell, Steve & Schwanen, Tim, 2016. "Estimating direct rebound effects for personal automotive travel in Great Britain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 313-325.
    20. Bel, Germà & Rosell, Jordi, 2017. "The impact of socioeconomic characteristics on CO2 emissions associated with urban mobility: Inequality across individuals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 251-261.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:178-:d:1306597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.