IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4821-d1091547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Technology Acceptance Model for Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Agri-Fresh Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Mohit Jain

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur 302017, India)

  • Gunjan Soni

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur 302017, India)

  • Deepak Verma

    (Department of Management Studies, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur 302017, India)

  • Rajendra Baraiya

    (Jindal Global Business School, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat 131001, India)

  • Bharti Ramtiyal

    (Department of Management Studies, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun 248002, India)

Abstract

Technology is advancing at a very rapid pace, and it helps the user in predicting things, taking the right decisions, making life less difficult and eventually increasing the profitability of their business. Due to the increasing global population, changing climatic conditions, and other natural factors predominating in nature, agriculture practice is becoming less predictable and as a result, farmers’ confidence is being lost, poverty and food insecurity are rising, and other issues are becoming more prevalent. In addition, it affects the sustainability of the food supply chain. So, there is a critical need for agriculture to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies. Here, we want to select a suitable technology acceptance model which comprehensively and robustly defines all the aspects of technology adoption factors in agriculture. From the different adoption theories, we choose one theory that fits our criteria very accurately; for this, we use a hybrid MCDM approach. We utilised fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR to make the selection logically and systematically correct. Three experts are employed in the study. Fuzzy AHP helps to find the weightage of criteria used by the fuzzy VIKOR technique in ranking the theories. The results showed that the UTAUT ranking comes number one after applying all the suitable criteria and alternatives, and it is the most accurate theory for analysing the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in agriculture. This article offers readers a methodical approach for choosing a technology adoption paradigm. The hypothesis that best fits a person’s criteria can be determined by comparing them to potential alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohit Jain & Gunjan Soni & Deepak Verma & Rajendra Baraiya & Bharti Ramtiyal, 2023. "Selection of Technology Acceptance Model for Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Agri-Fresh Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4821-:d:1091547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4821/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4821/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hillary Mugiyo & Vimbayi G. P. Chimonyo & Mbulisi Sibanda & Richard Kunz & Cecilia R. Masemola & Albert T. Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2021. "Evaluation of Land Suitability Methods with Reference to Neglected and Underutilised Crop Species: A Scoping Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Abbas Mardani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Kannan Govindan & Aslan Amat Senin & Ahmad Jusoh, 2016. "VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-38, January.
    3. James B. Pick & Kamala Gollakota & Manju Singh, 2014. "Technology for Development: Understanding Influences on use of Rural Telecenters in India," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 296-323, October.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Peyman Mohammady & Amin Amid, 2011. "Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 411-431, December.
    6. Kabbiri, Ronald & Dora, Manoj & Kumar, Vikas & Elepu, Gabriel & Gellynck, Xavier, 2018. "Mobile phone adoption in agri-food sector: Are farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa connected?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 253-261.
    7. Se-Joon Hong & James Y. L. Thong & Jae-Yun Moon & Kar-Yan Tam, 2008. "Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 431-445, September.
    8. Thai Hoang Tuyet Nhi & Chia-Nan Wang & Nguyen Van Thanh, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Application in Geothermal Power Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Awasthi, Anjali & Govindan, Kannan & Gold, Stefan, 2018. "Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 106-117.
    10. Bo Cao & Qingyi Li & Yuhang Zhu, 2022. "Comparison of Effects between Different Weight Calculation Methods for Improving Regional Landslide Susceptibility—A Case Study from Xingshan County of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Verma, Pranay & Sinha, Neena, 2018. "Integrating perceived economic wellbeing to technology acceptance model: The case of mobile based agricultural extension service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 207-216.
    12. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    13. Jamal Shah & Majed Alharthi, 2022. "The Association between Farmers’ Psychological Factors and Their Choice to Adopt Risk Management Strategies: The Case of Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    14. N Viswanadham & S Kameshwaran, 2013. "Ecosystem-Aware Global Supply Chain Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 8802, April.
    15. Parvin Golfam & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2019. "Evaluation of the VIKOR and FOWA Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Climate-Change Adaptation of Agricultural Water Supply," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(8), pages 2867-2884, June.
    16. Barak, Sasan & Dahooei, Jalil Heidary, 2018. "A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy MADM method for airlines safety evaluation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 134-149.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandeep Jagtap & Mohamed Afy-Shararah & Rakesh Raut & Sumit Gupta, 2023. "Advancing Sustainability and Efficiency in Supply Chains: Insights from the Special Issue on Sustainable Supply Chain and Lean Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-2, October.
    2. Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes & Tiago Trancoso, 2025. "Aerial pathways to resilience: the acceptance of drones in logistics transformation," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E. & Hawken, Scott & Sargolzaei, Sharifeh & Foroozanfa, Mona, 2019. "Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-116.
    2. Taheri, Fatemeh & D'Haese, Marijke & Fiems, Dieter & Azadi, Hossein, 2022. "The intentions of agricultural professionals towards diffusing wireless sensor networks: Application of technology acceptance model in Southwest Iran," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Wabukala, Benard M. & Bergland, Olvar & Mukisa, Nicholas & Adaramola, Muyiwa S. & Watundu, Susan & Orobia, Laura A. & Rudaheranwa, Nichodemus, 2024. "Electricity security in Uganda: Measurement and policy priorities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Subhodeep Mukherjee & Manish Mohan Baral & Chittipaka Venkataiah & Surya Kant Pal & Ramji Nagariya, 2021. "Service robots are an option for contactless services due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the hotels," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 48(4), pages 445-460, December.
    6. Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro & Dalia Štreimikienė & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2020. "Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Oguz YILDIZ & Hakan KITAPCI, 2018. "Exploring Factors Affecting Consumers¡¯ Adoption of Shopping via Mobile Applications in Turkey," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 60-75, June.
    8. Alikhani, Reza & Torabi, S. Ali & Altay, Nezih, 2019. "Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 69-82.
    9. Wong Lai Soon & Bobby Chai Boon Hui & Wong Kee Luen, 2013. "Joining the New Band: Factors Triggering the Intentions of Malaysian College and University Students to Adopt 4G Broadband," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(2), pages 58-65.
    10. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy & Katharina Buhtz & Andreas König, 2018. "Social influence in technology adoption: taking stock and moving forward," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 37-76, February.
    11. Anastasiou Kartas & Sigi Goode, 2012. "Use, perceived deterrence and the role of software piracy in video game console adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 261-277, April.
    12. Mateusz Piwowarski & Danuta Miłaszewicz & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2018. "Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    13. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Ke, Yiming & Chu, Han & Xu, Ruhang, 2019. "Location selection of seawater pumped hydro storage station in China based on multi-attribute decision making," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 410-425.
    14. Devaki Rau & Thorvald Haerem, 2010. "Applying an organizational learning perspective to new technology deployment by technological gatekeepers: A theoretical model and key issues for future research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 287-297, July.
    15. Yandong He & Xu Wang & Yun Lin & Fuli Zhou, 2016. "Optimal Partner Combination for Joint Distribution Alliance using Integrated Fuzzy EW-AHP and TOPSIS for Online Shopping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Jumaan, Ibrahim A. & Hashim, Noor Hazarina & Al-Ghazali, Basheer M., 2020. "The role of cognitive absorption in predicting mobile internet users’ continuance intention: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. C. Veeramani & R. Venugopal & S. Muruganandan, 2023. "An Exploration of the Fuzzy Inference System for the Daily Trading Decision and Its Performance Analysis Based on Fuzzy MCDM Methods," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1313-1340, October.
    18. Patchara Phochanikorn & Chunqiao Tan, 2019. "A New Extension to a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Ahmad, Salman & Ouenniche, Jamal & Kolosz, Ben W. & Greening, Philip & Andresen, John M. & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Xu, Bing, 2021. "A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    20. Sven Laumer & Andreas Eckhardt & Natascha Trunk, 2010. "Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 169-183, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4821-:d:1091547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.