IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4765-d1090596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How VR Technological Features Prompt Tourists’ Visiting Intention: An Integrated Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Bich Thuy Nguyen

    (Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, The University of Danang, Danang City 550000, Vietnam)

  • Thi Bich Ngoc Le

    (Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, The University of Danang, Danang City 550000, Vietnam)

  • Ngoc Tuan Chau

    (Faculty of Statistics and Informatics, University of Economics, The University of Danang, Danang City 550000, Vietnam)

Abstract

To achieve sustainable tourism, the tourism development authorities have used advanced technologies to promote destinations, attract visitors, and protect the environment. Accordingly, while the available research on tourism technologies indicates that virtual reality (VR) matters in the visit intention of potential tourists, the mechanism of their inner senses when experiencing VR technologies is overlooked. To fill in this void, this study develops a comprehensive conceptual model for investigating the influence of VR technological features on tourists’ minds, and consequently, their destination visit intention. This study integrates the technology acceptance model, stimuli-organism-response model, and flow theory into a unified conceptual model for a comprehensive understanding of tourists’ behavior. By focusing on tourists’ decision-making and behavior processes, this study sheds new light on how VR stimuli (i.e., vividness and interactivity) could translate into tourists’ attitudes and visiting intentions. This conceptual model is then tested and validated using structural equation modeling on survey data collected from 311 VR users after experiencing virtual tours designed for destinations in Vietnam. The findings indicate that virtual tours affect tourists’ psychological well-being, which translates into visiting intention. Based on the results, this study emphasizes the role of VR as a powerful marketing tool to promote a destination. Furthermore, approaches to enhance the effectiveness of VR tours, particularly, for tourism developers, are proposed. This study thus contributes to the literature in the area of VR tourism, contributing both theoretical and practical knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Bich Thuy Nguyen & Thi Bich Ngoc Le & Ngoc Tuan Chau, 2023. "How VR Technological Features Prompt Tourists’ Visiting Intention: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4765-:d:1090596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4765/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4765/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hudson, Sarah & Matson-Barkat, Sheila & Pallamin, Nico & Jegou, Guillaume, 2019. "With or without you? Interaction and immersion in a virtual reality experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 459-468.
    2. Sujin Bae & Timothy Hyungsoo Jung & Natasha Moorhouse & Minjeong Suh & Ohbyung Kwon, 2020. "The Influence of Mixed Reality on Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty in Cultural Heritage Attractions: A Brand Equity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    4. Agrebi, Sinda & Jallais, Joël, 2015. "Explain the intention to use smartphones for mobile shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 16-23.
    5. Muhammad Ashfaq & Jiang Yun & Abdul Waheed & Muhammad Shahid Khan & Muhammad Farrukh, 2019. "Customers’ Expectation, Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention of Used Products Online: Empirical Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    6. Rahimizhian, Sima & Ozturen, Ali & Ilkan, Mustafa, 2020. "Emerging realm of 360-degree technology to promote tourism destination," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Giulia Wally Scurati & Marco Bertoni & Serena Graziosi & Francesco Ferrise, 2021. "Exploring the Use of Virtual Reality to Support Environmentally Sustainable Behavior: A Framework to Design Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Teodoro Luque-Martínez & J. Alberto Castañeda-García & Dolores Ma Frías-Jamilena & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Miguel A. Rodríguez-Molina, 2007. "Determinants of the Use of the Internet as a Tourist Information Source," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 881-891, October.
    9. Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon & Chu, Shu-Chuan & Sauer, Paul L., 2017. "Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 89-103.
    10. Gao, Lingling & Bai, Xuesong, 2014. "Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 653-665.
    11. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman & Yiu-Fai Yung, 2000. "Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 22-42, May.
    12. Ionica Oncioiu & Iustin Priescu, 2022. "The Use of Virtual Reality in Tourism Destinations as a Tool to Develop Tourist Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Xiaohong Wu & Ivan Ka Wai Lai, 2022. "The use of 360-degree virtual tours to promote mountain walking tourism: stimulus–organism–response model," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 85-107, March.
    14. Oliver, Richard L, 1993. "Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute BAses of the Satisfaction Response," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 418-430, December.
    15. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Remus-Ion Hornoiu & Delia Popescu & Ionut-Andrei Militaru & Angelina De Pascale & Luciana-Floriana Poenaru & Marius Lucian Breaban, 2024. "Beyond The Screen: How Virtual Reality Shapes Sustainable Behaviours In Ecotourism Through Uses And Gratifications Theory," Cactus - The tourism journal for research, education, culture and soul, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 6(1), pages 16-27.
    2. Alaa Aggag & Wael Kortam, 2025. "Using Augmented Reality to Improve Tourism Marketing Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Sara Javed & Md Salamun Rashidin & Wang Jian, 2024. "Effects of heuristic and systematic cues on perceived content credibility of Sina Weibo influencers: the moderating role of involvement," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Yazmina Stappung & Camila Aliaga & Jorge Cartes & Liza Jego & José Antonio Reyes-Suárez & Nicolas A. Barriga & Felipe Besoain, 2023. "Developing 360° Virtual Tours for Promoting Tourism in Natural Parks in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi, Ting, 2018. "Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobile commerce: An extended TAM approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 274-284.
    2. Alaa Aggag & Wael Kortam, 2025. "Using Augmented Reality to Improve Tourism Marketing Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    4. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    5. Natarajan, Thamaraiselvan & Balasubramanian, Senthil Arasu & Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2017. "Understanding the intention to use mobile shopping applications and its influence on price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 8-22.
    6. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    7. Wedel, Michel & Bigné, Enrique & Zhang, Jie, 2020. "Virtual and augmented reality: Advancing research in consumer marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 443-465.
    8. Her-Sen Doong & Hsiangchu Lai, 2008. "Exploring usage continuance of e-negotiation systems: expectation and disconfirmation approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 111-126, March.
    9. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    10. Chen, Yi-Mu & Hsu, Tsuen-Ho & Lu, Yu-Jou, 2018. "Impact of flow on mobile shopping intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 281-287.
    11. Cowan, Kirsten & Ketron, Seth & Kostyk, Alena & Kristofferson, Kirk, 2023. "Can you smell the (virtual) roses? The influence of olfactory cues in virtual reality on immersion and positive brand responses," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 385-399.
    12. Mehra, Aashish & Rajput, Sneha & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Determinants of adoption of latest version smartphones: Theory and evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. Molinillo, Sebastian & Navarro-García, Antonio & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Japutra, Arnold, 2020. "The impact of affective and cognitive app experiences on loyalty towards retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Cheng, Peng & OuYang, Zhe & Liu, Yang, 2019. "Understanding bike sharing use over time by employing extended technology continuance theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 433-443.
    15. Aoshuang Li & Yongqiang Sun & Xiaodong Yang & Jinyu Guo, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Perceived Ease of Use and Continuance Usage of a Mobile Terminal: Mobility as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Daniel Badulescu & Alina Badulescu & Afrodita Borma & Benqian Li, 2021. "Sustainable Destination Marketing Ecosystem through Smartphone-Based Social Media: The Consumers’ Acceptance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Ping Li & Seoyoun Lee & Kyung Young Lee & Sung-Byung Yang & Younghoon Chang, 2023. "What Makes Viewers Engage in Live Streaming Shopping during and after the Pandemic: An Affordance Perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(4), pages 963-1000, December.
    18. Nedra, Bahri-Ammari & Hadhri, Walid & Mezrani, Mariem, 2019. "Determinants of customers' intentions to use hedonic networks: The case of Instagram," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 21-32.
    19. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    20. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Al-Nabhani, Khalid & Marriott, Hannah, 2020. "Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 139-157.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4765-:d:1090596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.