IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4699-d1089540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Diffusion of Bioplastics: What Can We Learn from Poly(Lactic Acid)?

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Vieira Teixeira

    (School of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Bloco E, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil
    SENAI Innovation Institute for Biosynthetic and Fibers–SENAI CETIQT, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-857, Brazil)

  • José Vitor Bomtempo

    (School of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Bloco E, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil)

  • Fábio de Almeida Oroski

    (School of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Bloco E, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil)

  • Paulo Luiz de Andrade Coutinho

    (SENAI Innovation Institute for Biosynthetic and Fibers–SENAI CETIQT, Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-857, Brazil)

Abstract

Environmental and social impacts caused by petrochemical plastics are generating significant concerns on a global scale. Bioplastics can contribute to the transition to more sustainable materials, but they did not expand at the expected rates in the early 2000s. With recent predictions indicating that the bioplastic capacities will almost triple in the next five years, what are the conditions that may now be combined to justify and enable such an expansion? This paper uses the case of PLA and general insights into other bioplastics (stylized facts) to detail these conditions. The results show that many bioplastics remained unused during the 20th Century, with interest increasing when plastic pollution became flagrant in the 1980s. For PLA, many efforts have been made to solve the technical and market issues, including through intense cooperation among stakeholders. While environmental concerns have propelled bioplastics, the general absence of structured end-of-life alternatives (e.g., recycling and composting infrastructures) hinders their diffusion. Conversely, the expanding regulations related to plastic pollution are now the primary driver of the growth of bioplastics. Therefore, for bioplastics, and especially PLA, the conditions seem to be emerging for them to diffuse at the predicted rates, but structural limitations in the bioplastics value chain still compromise the large-scale substitution of petrochemicals. This trend indicates that establishing end-of-life alternatives for bioplastics could help to remove the bottleneck in their diffusion process.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Vieira Teixeira & José Vitor Bomtempo & Fábio de Almeida Oroski & Paulo Luiz de Andrade Coutinho, 2023. "The Diffusion of Bioplastics: What Can We Learn from Poly(Lactic Acid)?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4699-:d:1089540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Döhler, Niklas & Wellenreuther, Claudia & Wolf, André, 2020. "Market dynamics of biodegradable bio-based plastics: Projections and linkages to European policies," HWWI Research Papers 193, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    2. Louise Staffas & Mathias Gustavsson & Kes McCormick, 2013. "Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Meyer, Andrew, 2015. "Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 108-121.
    4. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    5. Patricia D. Fuentes-Saguar & Alfredo J. Mainar-Causapé & Emanuele Ferrari, 2017. "The Role of Bioeconomy Sectors and Natural Resources in EU Economies: A Social Accounting Matrix-Based Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    7. J. Roland Ortt, 2010. "Understanding the Pre-diffusion Phases," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Joe Tidd (ed.), Gaining Momentum Managing the Diffusion of Innovations, chapter 2, pages 47-80, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Joe Tidd (ed.), 2010. "Gaining Momentum:Managing the Diffusion of Innovations," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p625, January.
    9. Joe Tidd, 2010. "From Models to the Management of Diffusion," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Joe Tidd (ed.), Gaining Momentum Managing the Diffusion of Innovations, chapter 1, pages 3-45, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Djukić-Vuković, A. & Mladenović, D. & Ivanović, J. & Pejin, J. & Mojović, L., 2019. "Towards sustainability of lactic acid and poly-lactic acid polymers production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 238-252.
    11. Rosenberg, Nathan, 1972. "Factors affecting the diffusion of technology," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 3-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophia Barquete & Ana Hiromi Shimozono & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Camila Gonçalves Castro & Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos Gomes & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "Exploring the Dynamic of a Circular Ecosystem: A Case Study about Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Rahul Kapoor & Thomas Klueter, 2021. "Unbundling and Managing Uncertainty Surrounding Emerging Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-74, March.
    3. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Ioannis Kostakis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2022. "Social and economic determinants of materials recycling and circularity in Europe: an empirical investigation," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(2), pages 263-281, April.
    5. Valeria Ferreira Gregorio & Laia Pié & Antonio Terceño, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review of Bio, Green and Circular Economy Trends in Publications in the Field of Economics and Business Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    6. Filip Lestan & Babu George & Sajal Kabiraj, 2021. "Economic Performance and Composition of Nordic Bioeconomy Sectors (NBES)," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Faria, Aline Mariane de & Braz, Antonio Carlos & Mello, Adriana Marotti de & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Ometto, Aldo Roberto, 2023. "Circular ecosystem management: Orchestrating ecosystem value proposition and configuration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    8. Lis, Anna Maria & Mackiewicz, Marta, 2023. "The implementation of green transformation through clusters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    10. Fındık, Derya & Tansel, Aysit, 2013. "Resources on the stage: a firm level analysis of the ict adoption in Turkey," MPRA Paper 65956, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Aug 2014.
    11. Tina Wiegand & Martin Wynn, 2023. "Sustainability, the Circular Economy and Digitalisation in the German Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, June.
    12. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    13. Abdulmajeed Almadhi & Abdelhakim Abdelhadi & Rakan Alyamani, 2023. "Moving from Linear to Circular Economy in Saudi Arabia: Life-Cycle Assessment on Plastic Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Sergio Cappucci & Serena Nappi & Andrea Cappelli, 2022. "Green Public Areas and Urban Open Spaces Management: New GreenCAL Tool Algorithms and Circular Economy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    16. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Delin Zeng & Jingbo Hu & Taohua Ouyang, 2017. "Managing Innovation Paradox in the Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ambidextrous Capability in a Focal Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Mbassi, Christophe Martial & Messono, Omang Ombolo, 2023. "Historical technology and current economic development: Reassessing the nature of the relationship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Aschhoff, Birgit & Baier, Elisabeth & Crass, Dirk & Hud, Martin & Hünermund, Paul & Köhler, Christian & Peters, Bettina & Rammer, Christian & Schricke, Esther & Schubert, Torben & Schwiebacher, Franz, 2013. "Innovation in Germany - Results of the German CIS 2006 to 2010. Background report on the Innovation Surveys 2007, 2009 and 2011 of the Mannheim Innovation Panel," ZEW Dokumentationen 13-01, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Monia Niero & Charlotte L. Jensen & Chiara Farné Fratini & Jens Dorland & Michael S. Jørgensen & Susse Georg, 2021. "Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1111-1120, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4699-:d:1089540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.