IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i9p418-d628348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Performance and Composition of Nordic Bioeconomy Sectors (NBES)

Author

Listed:
  • Filip Lestan

    (International Institute of Energy Policy & Diplomacy, Moscow State University of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, RU-119454 Moscow, Russia
    Business School, NORD University, NO-8026 Bodø, Norway)

  • Babu George

    (School of Business, Christian Brothers University, Memphis, TN 38104, USA)

  • Sajal Kabiraj

    (School of Entrepreneurship and Business, Häme University of Applied Sciences Ltd. (HAMK), FI-37630 Valkeakoski, Finland)

Abstract

The past decade has seen rapid development of the bioeconomy in the Nordic region. Consequently, the composition of sectors that intervene in the concept of bioeconomy serves as a powerful, progressive, and pure engine, which creates and drives market opportunities across various industries, particularly in the Nordic region. While the existing literature focuses explicitly on the bioeconomy and its holistic potential and results in the Nordic region, there are no studies that focus on the distribution of economic performance across Nordic Bioeconomy Sectors. In fact, previous research highlights the lack of empirical studies in bioeconomy from the social science perspective. This research methodology was designed in four different stages with the integration of so-called hybrid research methods. The qualitative research approach was conducted in order to define the criteria and indicators for Nordic Bioeconomy Sectors (NBES) and their economic performance. The quantitative research approach was conducted to statistically test Hypothesis H1 of this study and to conduct central tendency measures of economic performance within Nordic countries and Nordic Bioeconomy Sectors (NBES). The findings contribute in several ways to understand how sectors in the Nordic region performed economically. Firstly, the economic performance among the Nordic Bioeconomy Sectors (NBES) proves that individual sectors have diverse relationships with each other; therefore, each economic activity performs independently rather than correlative.

Suggested Citation

  • Filip Lestan & Babu George & Sajal Kabiraj, 2021. "Economic Performance and Composition of Nordic Bioeconomy Sectors (NBES)," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:418-:d:628348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/9/418/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/9/418/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louise Staffas & Mathias Gustavsson & Kes McCormick, 2013. "Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Wiebke Jander & Sven Wydra & Johann Wackerbauer & Philipp Grundmann & Stephan Piotrowski, 2020. "Monitoring Bioeconomy Transitions with Economic–Environmental and Innovation Indicators: Addressing Data Gaps in the Short Term," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Patricia D. Fuentes-Saguar & Alfredo J. Mainar-Causapé & Emanuele Ferrari, 2017. "The Role of Bioeconomy Sectors and Natural Resources in EU Economies: A Social Accounting Matrix-Based Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Genovaite Liobikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene & Xueli Chen, 2019. "Evaluation of bioeconomy in the context of strong sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 955-964, September.
    5. Manfred Kircher, 2019. "Bioeconomy: Markets, Implications, and Investment Opportunities," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-36, July.
    6. Erik Gawel & Nadine Pannicke & Nina Hagemann, 2019. "A Path Transition Towards a Bioeconomy—The Crucial Role of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Tévécia Ronzon & Stephan Piotrowski & Saulius Tamosiunas & Lara Dammer & Michael Carus & Robert M’barek, 2020. "Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeug, Walther & Bezama, Alberto & Thrän, Daniela, 2020. "Towards a holistic and integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of the bioeconomy: Background on concepts, visions and measurements," UFZ Discussion Papers 7/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    2. Maria Backhouse & Kristina Lorenzen, 2021. "Knowledge Production and Land Relations in the Bioeconomy. A Case Study on the Brazilian Sugar-Bioenergy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Andrzej Czyżewski & Andrzej Grzyb & Anna Matuszczak & Mariola Michałowska, 2021. "Factors for Bioeconomy Development in EU Countries with Different Overall Levels of Economic Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Baldoni, Edoardo & Philippidis, George & Spekreijse, Jurjen & Gurría, Patricia & Lammens, Tijs & Parisi, Claudia & Ronzon, Tévécia & Vis, Martijn & M'Barek, Robert, 2021. "Getting your hands dirty: A data digging exercise to unearth the EU's bio-based chemical sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Mauricio Alviar & Andrés García-Suaza & Laura Ramírez-Gómez & Simón Villegas-Velásquez, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the Bioeconomy: The Case of Colombia and Antioquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Emilio Abad-Segura & Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña, 2021. "Implications for Sustainability of the Joint Application of Bioeconomy and Circular Economy: A Worldwide Trend Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Idiano D’Adamo & Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Enrica Imbert & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2022. "Exploring regional transitions to the bioeconomy using a socio-economic indicator: the case of Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(3), pages 989-1021, October.
    10. Wen, Lanjiao & Chatalova, Lioudmila, 2021. "Will transaction costs and economies of scale tip the balance in farm size in industrial agriculture? An illustration for non-food biomass production in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2).
    11. Muluken Elias Adamseged & Philipp Grundmann, 2020. "Understanding Business Environments and Success Factors for Emerging Bioeconomy Enterprises through a Comprehensive Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Alexandru Giurca & Liviu Nichiforel & Petru Tudor Stăncioiu & Marian Drăgoi & Daniel-Paul Dima, 2022. "Unlocking Romania’s Forest-Based Bioeconomy Potential: Knowledge-Action-Gaps and the Way Forward," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Gołębiewski, Jarosław, 2020. "Employment And Added Value In Europen Union Bioeconomy – A Sustainable Development Perspective," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(4).
    14. Leire Barañano & Naroa Garbisu & Itziar Alkorta & Andrés Araujo & Carlos Garbisu, 2021. "Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Tévécia Ronzon & Susanne Iost & George Philippidis, 2022. "Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8195-8217, June.
    16. Leire Barañano & Olatz Unamunzaga & Naroa Garbisu & Siebe Briers & Timokleia Orfanidou & Blasius Schmid & Inazio Martínez de Arano & Andrés Araujo & Carlos Garbisu, 2022. "Assessment of the Development of Forest-Based Bioeconomy in European Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Lanjiao Wen & Lioudmila Chatalova, 2021. "Will Transaction Costs and Economies of Scale Tip the Balance in Farm Size in Industrial Agriculture? An Illustration for Non-Food Biomass Production in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Valeria Ferreira Gregorio & Laia Pié & Antonio Terceño, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review of Bio, Green and Circular Economy Trends in Publications in the Field of Economics and Business Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-39, November.
    19. Leonardo Vieira Teixeira & José Vitor Bomtempo & Fábio de Almeida Oroski & Paulo Luiz de Andrade Coutinho, 2023. "The Diffusion of Bioplastics: What Can We Learn from Poly(Lactic Acid)?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
    20. Kutay Cingiz & Hugo Gonzalez-Hermoso & Wim Heijman & Justus H. H. Wesseler, 2021. "A Cross-Country Measurement of the EU Bioeconomy: An Input–Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-39, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:418-:d:628348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.