IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13905-d1242913.html

“Realization–Feedback” Path of Ecological Product Value in Rural Areas from the Perspective of Capital Recycling Theory: A Case Study of Zhengjiabang Village in Changyang County, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hafo Wang

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jing Luo

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Lingling Tian

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jianwei Liu

    (Hubei Tiandiyun Geomatics Technology Group, Wuhan 430010, China)

  • Yilin Gan

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Tingting Han

    (Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
    College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Transforming ecological products into sources of economic value can help mitigate the tension between environmental conservation and economic growth. Using the capital cycle theory and the unique qualities of eco-friendly items, this study utilizes a case study approach, focusing on Zhengjiabang Village located in Changyang, Hubei Province. Meanwhile, we build a value realization chain of ecological products by combining the practical process of the village. On this basis, we reveal the roles of each subject and object in the evolutionary process, from ecological resources to ecological products. We also identify the key issues of eco-industrial expansion and spatial evolution. Taking the industrialization of ecological capital as the key, we add a step of value feedback to create a cycle of ecological product value realization and strengthen the sustainability of capital and industry. Ultimately, we aim to promote the transformation of ecological environmental advantages into economic advantages, and provide a new concept able to promote the construction of endogenous mechanisms for realizing the value of ecological products in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Hafo Wang & Jing Luo & Lingling Tian & Jianwei Liu & Yilin Gan & Tingting Han, 2023. "“Realization–Feedback” Path of Ecological Product Value in Rural Areas from the Perspective of Capital Recycling Theory: A Case Study of Zhengjiabang Village in Changyang County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13905-:d:1242913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gergaud, Olivier & Ginsburgh, Victor, 2010. "Natural Endowments, Production Technologies and the Quality of Wines in Bordeaux. Does Terroir Matter?," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 3-21, April.
    2. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    3. Sierra, Rodrigo & Russman, Eric, 2006. "On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 131-141, August.
    4. Gergaud, Olivier & Ginsburgh, Victor, 2010. "Natural Endowments, Production Technologies and the Quality of Wines in Bordeaux. Does Terroir Matter?," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(01), pages 3-21, March.
    5. Xinwei Guo & Bin Yu & Meiyan Yan & Hui Guo & Junhu Ren & Hanxia Zhang & Zonggang Zhang, 2022. "Endogenous Development Models and Paths Selection of Rural Revitalization from the Perspective of Ecological Environment Advantages: A Case Study of Nanshi Village, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongyu Luo & Guangning Sun & Weilong Zhou & Jihe Lian & Yanfei Sun & Yingen Hu, 2025. "Promoting Rural Revitalization via Natural Resource Value Realization in National Parks: A Case Study of Baishanzu National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincent Hoang & Takao Iida & Shigeru Matsumoto & Natsuki Watanabe & Clevo Wilson, 2016. "Consumer’s comparison between local and imported organic products: a hedonic analysis of the Japanese table wine market," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 405-415, December.
    2. Christopher R. Gustafson & Travis J. Lybbert & Daniel A. Sumner, 2016. "Consumer sorting and hedonic valuation of wine attributes: exploiting data from a field experiment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(1), pages 91-103, January.
    3. Mérel, Pierre & Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel & Paroissien, Emmanuel, 2021. "How big is the “lemons” problem? Historical evidence from French wines," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Kym Anderson & Vicente Pinilla, 2022. "Wine's belated globalization, 1845–2025," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 742-765, June.
    5. Bruno Pecchioli & David Moroz, 2023. "Do geographical appellations provide useful quality signals? The case of Scotch single malt whiskies," Post-Print hal-04144070, HAL.
    6. Loïc Henry, 2023. "Adapting the designated area of geographical indications to climate change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1088-1115, August.
    7. David Moroz, 2024. "What does terroir mean? A science mapping of a multidimensional concept," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 889-913, September.
    8. Fabien Candau & Florent Deisting & Julie Schlick, 2017. "How Income and Crowding Effects Influence the World Market for French Wines," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 963-977, May.
    9. Pecchioli, Bruno & Moroz, David, 2023. "Do geographical appellations provide useful quality signals? The case of Scotch single malt whiskies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    10. Robin Cross & Andrew J. Plantinga & Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "What Is the Value of Terroir?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(3), pages 152-156, May.
    11. Koen Deconinck & Johan Swinnen, 2014. "The Political Economy of Geographical Indications," LICOS Discussion Papers 35814, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    12. Catherine Haeck & Giulia Meloni & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "The Value of Terroir: A Historical Analysis of the Bordeaux and Champagne Geographical Indications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 598-619, December.
    13. Hennessy, David A., 2009. "Crop Yield Skewness and the Normal Distribution," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(01), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Swinnen, J. & Meloni, G. & Haeck, C., 2018. "What is the Value of Terroir? Historical Evidence from Champagne and Bordeaux," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277221, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Fares, M’hand & Raza, Saqlain & Thomas, Alban, 2018. "Is there complementarity between labels and brands? Evidence from small French co-operatives," TSE Working Papers 18-895, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    16. Meloni, Giulia & Swinnen, Johan, 2018. "Trade and terroir. The political economy of the world’s first geographical indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-20.
    17. Svetlana Ignjatijević & Jelena Vapa Tankosić & Nemanja Lekić & Duško Petrović & Sandra Brkanlić & Bojan Vapa & Vladimir Tomašević & Nikola Puvača & Radivoj Prodanović & Irena Milojević, 2022. "Agro-Environmental Practices and Business Performance in the Wine Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Kym Anderson, 2019. "Evolving Varietal and Quality Distinctiveness of Australia’s Wine Regions," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kym Anderson (ed.), The International Economics of Wine, chapter 24, pages 599-628, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Corsi, Alessandro & Strøm, Steinar, 2013. "The Price Premium for Organic Wines: Estimating a Hedonic Farm-Gate Price Equation," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 29-48, May.
    20. Alain Schatt & Jean-Philippe Weisskopf, 2025. "Unveiling the collective reputation effect of French wines," Tourism Economics, , vol. 31(6), pages 1140-1159, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13905-:d:1242913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.