IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13038-d1228377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of a Green Supply Chain Based on the Kano Model Considering Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Hossein Sheikh Azadi

    (School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran P.O. Box 14179-35840, Iran)

  • Vahid Shamsi Nesary

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran P.O. Box 15875-4416, Iran)

  • Omid Kebriyaii

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran P.O. Box 16846-13114, Iran)

  • Mohammad Khalilzadeh

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istinye University, 34396 Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Jurgita Antucheviciene

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Nowadays, the design of supply chain networks should be based on environmental issues as well as the needs of customers since the main driver of a supply chain network is customers. Continuous innovation of products requires understanding the features that are most important to customers, and product pricing should be carried out in a way that includes the satisfaction of both customers and manufacturers. This study uses the Kano model to classify product features into different categories. The design of the green supply chain network based on the Kano model has not been investigated in the literature so far. This study examines a green supply chain network including multiple manufacturers, product types, distributors, and carriers that is designed based on Kano’s conceptual model of multiple needs. In the proposed mathematical model of this paper, customer demand is a function of the selling price of the product, transportation pollution is minimized, and a solution based on the Cooperative Game Theory approach is used to solve the mathematical model using the GAMS software. One of the advantages of the proposed mathematical model in this research compared to other supply chain models is that the design needs of the supply chain network based on the Kano model (“must-be”, “one-dimensional”, “attractive” and “indifferent”) can be determined based on customer satisfaction. In addition, the price of the product can be determined according to the satisfaction of both customers and the manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Hossein Sheikh Azadi & Vahid Shamsi Nesary & Omid Kebriyaii & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2023. "Design of a Green Supply Chain Based on the Kano Model Considering Pricing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13038-:d:1228377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hull, Bradley, 2005. "The role of elasticity in supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 301-314, December.
    2. E. Grigoroudis & E. Tsitsiridi & C. Zopounidis, 2013. "Linking customer satisfaction, employee appraisal, and business performance: an evaluation methodology in the banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 5-27, May.
    3. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong, 2018. "Supply chain coordination with customer returns and retailer's store brand product," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 69-82.
    4. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    5. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Heydari, Jafar & Govindan, Kannan & Aslani, Amin, 2019. "Pricing and greening decisions in a three-tier dual channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 185-196.
    7. Sibdari, Soheil & Pyke, David F., 2014. "Dynamic pricing with uncertain production cost: An alternating-move approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 218-228.
    8. Wang, Charles X. & Qian, Zhuang & Zhao, Yabing, 2018. "Impact of manufacturer and retailer's market pricing power on customer satisfaction incentives in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 98-112.
    9. Seifbarghy, Mehdi & Nouhi, Khashayar & Mahmoudi, Amin, 2015. "Contract design in a supply chain considering price and quality dependent demand with customer segmentation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 108-118.
    10. Ramezanian, Reza & Behboodi, Zahra, 2017. "Blood supply chain network design under uncertainties in supply and demand considering social aspects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 69-82.
    11. Zhi-Peng Li & Hyi-Thaek Ceong & Sang-Joon Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Blockchain Operation Capabilities on Competitive Performance in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Thomas, Douglas J. & Griffin, Paul M., 1996. "Coordinated supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Abbie Griffin & John R. Hauser, 1993. "The Voice of the Customer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    14. Yauwseph Tandiono & Hsin Rau, 2022. "An Enhanced Model Using the Kano Model, QFDE, and TRIZ with a Component-Based Approach for Sustainable and Innovative Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Ma, Peng & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2013. "Supply chain channel strategies with quality and marketing effort-dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 572-581.
    16. Elina Dace & Agnis Stibe & Lelde Timma, 2020. "A holistic approach to manage environmental quality by using the Kano model and social cognitive theory," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 430-443, March.
    17. Fernando Barrios-Ipenza & Arturo Calvo-Mora & Fernando Criado-García & Walter H. Curioso, 2021. "Quality Evaluation of Health Services Using the Kano Model in Two Hospitals in Peru," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Mahmoud Abdulhadi Alabdali & Mohammad Asif Salam, 2022. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Procurement for Creating Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nan Xu & Yaoqun Xu & Haiyan Zhong, 2023. "Pricing Decisions for Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Low-Carbon Input by Echelon Utilization Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-30, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khorshidvand, Behrooz & Soleimani, Hamed & Sibdari, Soheil & Seyyed Esfahani, Mir Mehdi, 2021. "Revenue management in a multi-level multi-channel supply chain considering pricing, greening, and advertising decisions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Zuo, Wenming & Bai, Weijing & Zhu, Wenfeng & He, Xinming & Qiu, Xinxin, 2022. "Changes in service quality of sharing accommodation: Evidence from airbnb," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Binbin He & Haiya Cai & Yingchen Ji & Siyu Zhu, 2023. "Supply Chain Green Manufacturing and Green Marketing Strategies under Network Externality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Peng Ma & Yeming Gong & Mingzhou Jin, 2019. "Quality efforts in medical supply chains considering patient benefits," Post-Print hal-02312386, HAL.
    5. Eric (Er) Fang, 2011. "The Effect of Strategic Alliance Knowledge Complementarity on New Product Innovativeness in China," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 158-172, February.
    6. Freiesleben, Johannes, 2010. "Proposing a new approach to discussing economic effects of design quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 348-359, April.
    7. Artem Timoshenko & John R. Hauser, 2019. "Identifying Customer Needs from User-Generated Content," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Rauniar, Rupak & Doll, William & Rawski, Greg & Hong, Paul, 2008. "Shared knowledge and product design glitches in integrated product development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 723-736, August.
    9. Hasmat Malik & Asyraf Afthanorhan & Noor Aina Amirah & Nuzhat Fatema, 2021. "Machine Learning Approach for Targeting and Recommending a Product for Project Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-29, August.
    10. Chernonog, Tatyana & Avinadav, Tal & Ben-Zvi, Tal, 2019. "How to set price and quality in a supply chain of virtual products under bi-criteria and risk consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 156-163.
    11. Yilmaz, Ibrahim & Yoon, Sang Won & Seok, Hyesung, 2017. "A framework and algorithm for fair demand and capacity sharing in collaborative networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 137-147.
    12. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    13. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    14. Tian, Yi & Ma, Junhai & Xie, Lei & Koivumäki, Timo & Seppänen, Veikko, 2020. "Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers’ channel preference and sales effort," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Manuel E. Sosa & Steven D. Eppinger & Craig M. Rowles, 2004. "The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12), pages 1674-1689, December.
    16. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Kai-Leung Yung & Jiafu Tang & Andrew W. H. Ip & Dingwei Wang, 2006. "Heuristics for Joint Decisions in Production, Transportation, and Order Quantity," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 99-116, February.
    18. Ellen H.M. Moors & Rogier Donders, 2009. "Understanding consumer needs and preferences in new product development: the case of functional food innovations," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 09-03, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2009.
    19. Zhang, Yibin & Hafezi, Maryam & Zhao, Xuan & Shi, Victor, 2017. "Reprint of “The impact of development cost on product line design and its environmental performance”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 126-134.
    20. Jon M. Stein, 2023. "Utilizing Collective Intelligence to Combine Theory of Constraints with Lean Six Sigma," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(6), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13038-:d:1228377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.