IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9181-d1165213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Optimal Emission Reduction and Recycling Strategies in Construction Material Supply Chain under Carbon Cap–Trade Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahui Xu

    (College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Renfu Jia

    (College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Buhan Wang

    (College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Anqi Xu

    (College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

  • Xiaoxia Zhu

    (College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China)

Abstract

As urbanization continues to expand in China, carbon emissions (CE) from the construction industry and the amount of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) are rapidly increasing. In order to reduce CEs and environmental hazards, this paper constructs a Stackelberg game model to explore the evolution of carbon emissions reduction (CER) and recycling strategies in the construction material supply chain (CMSC) under the carbon cap–trade (C&T) mechanism. The monotonicity analysis on important variables and model comparison simulation are then conducted. The results show the following: (1) A contractor’s green preference positively correlates with the CER level and recycling rate, while the CER cost exerts the opposite effect. (2) The C&T mechanism incentivizes low-emission manufacturers to actively participate in CER. However, excessive carbon trading prices may put high-emitters in a dilemma, making the whole supply chain profitless. (3) The recycler’s decision to recycle C&DW tends to follow the manufacturer’s CER decision. These findings not only help policy makers understand stakeholders’ behavior in CMSC under C&T mechanism, but also provide a basis for the government to formulate CER policies and introduce low-carbon management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahui Xu & Renfu Jia & Buhan Wang & Anqi Xu & Xiaoxia Zhu, 2023. "The Optimal Emission Reduction and Recycling Strategies in Construction Material Supply Chain under Carbon Cap–Trade Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9181-:d:1165213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Duo & Zuo, Jian & Miller, Travis R. & Duan, Huabo & Schiller, Georg, 2022. "Potential for CO2 mitigation and economic benefits from accelerated carbonation of construction and demolition waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Chaube, Anshuman & Chapman, Andrew & Minami, Akari & Stubbins, James & Huff, Kathryn D., 2021. "The role of current and emerging technologies in meeting Japan’s mid- to long-term carbon reduction goals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    3. Ruwen Tan & Xiang Qing & Jingsong Yang & Jing Zhang & Deng Li, 2022. "Analysis on Recycling Channel Selection of Construction and Demolition Waste in China from the Perspective of Supply Chain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Plambeck, Erica L., 2012. "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S1), pages 64-74.
    5. Fang, Chang & Fan, Shuyi & Chi, Mingxiang & Wang, Weizhong, 2023. "The optimal remanufacturing strategy, returned quality choice and independent remanufacturers’ advantage for tackling extreme weather," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Yingmiao Qian & Xian-An Yu & Malin Song & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Complexity analysis and control of game behavior of subjects in green building materials supply chain considering technology subsidies," Post-Print hal-03974946, HAL.
    7. Liu, Jingkuang & Li, Yuxuan & Wang, Zhenshuang, 2023. "The potential for carbon reduction in construction waste sorting: A dynamic simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Shan Yu & Qiang Hou & Jiayi Sun, 2020. "Investment Game Model Analysis of Emission-Reduction Technology Based on Cost Sharing and Coordination under Cost Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Wen Jiang & Menglin Liu & Lu Gan & Chong Wang, 2021. "Optimal Pricing, Ordering, and Coordination for Prefabricated Building Supply Chain with Power Structure and Flexible Cap-and-Trade," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Kowalski & Marzena Lendo-Siwicka & Grzegorz Wrzesiński & Roman Trach, 2023. "Verification of Performance Standards for Construction Equipment in Terms of CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-10, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Chan, Ying Tung & Zhao, Hong, 2023. "Optimal carbon tax rates in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with a supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Juanjuan Qin & Liguo Ren & Liangjie Xia, 2017. "Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Strategies of Supply Chain under Various Demand Forecasting Scenarios," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Ji, Guojun & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Yang, Guangyong, 2014. "Constructing sustainable supply chain under double environmental medium regulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 211-219.
    5. Wen, Wen & Zhou, P. & Zhang, Fuqiang, 2018. "Carbon emissions abatement: Emissions trading vs consumer awareness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-47.
    6. Fernando, Yudi & Hor, Wei Lin, 2017. "Impacts of energy management practices on energy efficiency and carbon emissions reduction: A survey of malaysian manufacturing firms," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 62-73.
    7. Junwu Wang & Yinghui Song & Wei Wang & Suikuan Wang & Feng Guo & Jiequn Lu, 2022. "Marine Construction Waste Recycling Mechanism Considering Public Participation and Carbon Trading: A Study on Dynamic Modeling and Simulation Based on Sustainability Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2019. "OM Forum—New Opportunities for Operations Management Research in Sustainability," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Berling, Peter & Eng-Larsson, Fredrik, 2017. "Environmental implications of transport contract choice - capacity investment and pricing under volume and capacity contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 129-142.
    10. Liangjie Xia & Tingting Guo & Juanjuan Qin & Xiaohang Yue & Ning Zhu, 2018. "Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 149-175, September.
    11. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    12. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    13. Islam, Md. Monirul & Irfan, Muhammad & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh: The relative influencing profiles of economic factors, urbanization, physical infrastructure and institutional quality," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1130-1149.
    14. Peng Liu & Ying Chen, 2022. "Differential Game Model of Shared Manufacturing Supply Chain Considering Low-Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Chen, Xi, 2018. "When does store consolidation lead to higher emissions?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 109-122.
    16. Chien-Ming Chen, 2017. "Supply Chain Strategies and Carbon Intensity: The Roles of Process Leanness, Diversification Strategy, and Outsourcing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 603-620, July.
    17. Siling Yang & Jie Qiu & Heping Huang, 2022. "Research on the Governance Relationship among Stakeholders of Construction Waste Recycling Based on ANP-SNA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    19. Xiao Zhou & Xiancong Wu, 2023. "Decisions for a Retailer-Led Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Altruistic Preference under Carbon Quota Policy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & de Leeuw, Sander, 2021. "Learning from the past to shape the future: A comprehensive text mining analysis of OR/MS reviews," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9181-:d:1165213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.