IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8166-d1149342.html

Generation Z Romanian Students’ Relation with Rural Tourism—An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mihail Ovidiu Tănase

    (Faculty of Business and Tourism, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piața Romană, 010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Puiu Nistoreanu

    (Faculty of Business and Tourism, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piața Romană, 010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Răzvan Dina

    (Faculty of Business and Tourism, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piața Romană, 010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Bogdan Georgescu

    (Faculty of Marketing, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piața Romană, 010404 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Virgil Nicula

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 17 Calea Dumbrăvii, 550324 Sibiu, Romania)

  • Cosmin Nicolae Mirea

    (Faculty of Business and Tourism, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 6 Piața Romană, 010404 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The subject of generations and their differences has been intensely analyzed and debated. Each generation has its own characteristics, regardless of the element that differentiates them. Gen Z’s relationship with tourism has been approached in recent years from various perspectives by many scholars. For the current research, representative characteristics were identified as important for Gen Z: off-the-beaten-path locations and experiences. Off-the-beaten-path locations refer to small-scale destinations, under-tourism, local businesses, sustainability, and local traditions. All of the aspects mentioned before are typical of rural tourism. Experiences are introduced by various elements of rural attractiveness: material cultural heritage (MCH) and immaterial (ICH), the living human treasures program (LHT), wine tourism, products with a protected designation of origin (PDO), products with a protected geographical indication (PGI), culinary diversity, and other rural leisure facilities. Two purposes have been established: to identify the relationship between Gen Z and rural tourism and its components defined by cultural heritage and traditional gastronomy, and to construct a predictive model regarding Gen Z’s behavior when traveling to rural destinations. For this, we performed a quantitative investigation among university students from Romania using an online survey. Using 280 Gen Z respondents from 323 valid responses, we performed a direct logistic regression. The results showed that they value local gastronomy and unique attractions, which we can include in MCH. The price represents an important element when choosing an accommodation unit. Due to the constantly increasing share of Gen Z in the tourism market, destinations and tourism operators will have time to prepare and adapt to new realities. Transversal research will benefit from the opportunity to compare Gen Z’s preferences and changes over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihail Ovidiu Tănase & Puiu Nistoreanu & Răzvan Dina & Bogdan Georgescu & Virgil Nicula & Cosmin Nicolae Mirea, 2023. "Generation Z Romanian Students’ Relation with Rural Tourism—An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8166-:d:1149342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicoleta Mateoc-Sîrb & Simona Albu & Ciprian Rujescu & Ramona Ciolac & Eugenia Țigan & Oana Brînzan & Camelia Mănescu & Teodor Mateoc & Ioana Anda Milin, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism Development in the Protected Areas of Maramureș, Romania: Destinations with High Authenticity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Gabrielova, Karina & Buchko, Aaron A., 2021. "Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 489-499.
    3. Belletti, Giovanni & Marescotti, Andrea & Touzard, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 45-57.
    4. Alexandra-Ioana Glogovețan & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Mariantonietta Fiore & Cristina Bianca Pocol, 2022. "Consumer Perception and Understanding of European Union Quality Schemes: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Gina Ionela Butnaru & Valentin Niţă & Cristiana Melinte & Alexandru Anichiti & Geanina Brînză, 2022. "The Nexus between Sustainable Behaviour of Tourists from Generation Z and the Factors That Influence the Protection of Environmental Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Socrat Ghadban & Maya Shames & Jad Abou Arrage & Amal Abou Fayyad, 2017. "Rural tourism in Lebanon: what does the market reveal?," Working Papers hal-01655526, HAL.
    7. Socrat Ghadban & Maya Shames & Jad Abou Arrage & Amal Abou Fayyad, 2017. "Rural tourism in Lebanon: what does the market reveal?," CEPN Working Papers 2017-19, Centre d'Economie de l'Université de Paris Nord.
    8. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01655526 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Sujood Gf & Samiha Siddiqui & Naseem Bano & Sheeba Hamid, 2022. "Travelling to Tourism Destinations through the lens of Sustainability: An extended TPB Model to predict behavioural intention of Gen Z Consumers," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, CinTurs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 10(3), pages 172-189.
    10. Andra Poruțiu & Olivia Paula Tirpe & Camelia Oroian & Valentin C. Mihai & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Daniel I. Chiciudean & Crina Poruțiu, 2021. "Analysis on Tourists’ Preferences for Rural Tourism Destinations in Romania," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatjana Peulić & Aleksandar Marić & Nikola Maravić & Aleksandra Novaković & Bojana Kalenjuk Pivarski & Ivana Čabarkapa & Jasmina Lazarević & Stefan Šmugović & Predrag Ikonić, 2023. "Consumer Attitudes and Preferences towards Traditional Food Products in Vojvodina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Zirui Zhan & Jeremy Cenci & Jiazhen Zhang, 2022. "Frontier of Rural Revitalization in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Rural Tourist Towns," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Puwei Zhang & Li Wu & Rui Li, 2023. "Development Drivers of Rural Summer Health Tourism for the Urban Elderly: A Demand- and Supply-Based Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Socrat Ghadban & Maya Shames & Haifa Abou Mayaleh, 2017. "Trash Crisis and Solid Waste Management in Lebanon-Analyzing Hotels’ Commitment and Guests’ Preferences," Post-Print hal-01611253, HAL.
    5. Andra Poruțiu & Olivia Paula Tirpe & Camelia Oroian & Valentin C. Mihai & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Daniel I. Chiciudean & Crina Poruțiu, 2021. "Analysis on Tourists’ Preferences for Rural Tourism Destinations in Romania," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Baliga, Vikram & Shetty, Santhosha G. & Gil, Mathew Thomas & Shenoy, Ravindra & Rao, Krithika, 2024. "Analysing Purchase Preference Towards Geographical Indications (GIs) Using Consumer Segmentation Approach," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 16(2), June.
    7. Alina Petronela Pricope Vancia & Codruța Adina Băltescu & Gabriel Brătucu & Alina Simona Tecău & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Liliana Duguleană, 2023. "Examining the Disruptive Potential of Generation Z Tourists on the Travel Industry in the Digital Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Chunyan Li & Jianmei Gao & Lanqing Ge & Weina Hu & Qi Ban, 2023. "Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, October.
    9. Alice Stiletto & Luigi Cembalo & Samuele Trestini, 2024. "All that glitters is not gold: the impact of the Nutri-score label on food with geographical indication," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Shiran Lin & He Zhu & Jiaming Liu & Fengjiao Li & Chenrouyu Zheng, 2025. "Why Do Tourists Visit the Food Market? A Host–Guest Sharing Model Based on the Theory of Self-Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-35, February.
    11. Jenica Călina & Aurel Călina & Tiberiu Iancu & Gheorghe Marian Vangu, 2022. "Research on the Use of Aerial Scanning and Gis in the Design of Sustainable Agricultural Production Extension Works in an Agritourist Farm in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-32, October.
    12. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Carlos Moreno Miranda & Ra?l Moreno & Pablo Moreno, 2020. "Protected-Denomination-of-Origin Cocoa Bean: Chain governance and Sustainability Performance," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(1), pages 1-24.
    15. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    16. Costanigro, Marco & Dubois, Magalie & Gracia, Azucena & Cardebat, Jean-Marie, 2025. "The Information Value of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    17. Filippo Arfini & Federico Antonioli & Elena Cozzi & Michele Donati & Marianna Guareschi & Maria Cecilia Mancini & Mario Veneziani, 2019. "Sustainability, Innovation and Rural Development: The Case of Parmigiano-Reggiano PDO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Chaojun Li & Xinjia Huang, 2022. "How Does COVID-19 Risk Perception Affect Wellness Tourist Intention: Findings on Chinese Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Marcello De Rosa & Margherita Masi & Ludovica Apostolico & Luca Bartoli & Martina Francescone, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Risks of Unsustainability Linked to “Disaffection Effects” in the Dairy Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    20. Ziyu Jia & Yan Jiao & Wei Zhang & Zheng Chen, 2022. "Rural Tourism Competitiveness and Development Mode, a Case Study from Chinese Township Scale Using Integrated Multi-Source Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8166-:d:1149342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.