IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2744-d759141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of the Right Moment for Motor Vehicle Replacement—Life-Cycle Analysis in Serbia and Montenegro

Author

Listed:
  • Vujadin Vesovic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Dragutin Jovanovic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milos Arsic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Zoran Avramovic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Svetozar Sofijanic

    (Belgrade Polytechnic College, Academy of Applied Technical Studies Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Boban Djorovic

    (Military Academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Natasa Gospic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Nena Tomovic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Dragan Milosevic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Mladen Dobric

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Sinisa Arsic

    (Telekom Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragan Kostadinovic

    (Military Academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Safet Kalac

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Velibor Peulic

    (Faculty of Business Economics, PanEuropean University ”Apeiron”, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Tibor Fazekas

    (City Hall Administration, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Dragana Rosulj

    (Belgrade Polytechnic College, Academy of Applied Technical Studies Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dijana Medenica Mitrovic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Jasmin Hodzic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Marijana Prelevic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Milan Andric

    (Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

This paper deals with the issue of planning the end-of-life phase of motor vehicle life cycles in Serbia and Montenegro. This topic is trending around sustainability issues, given the very unfavorable age structure of vehicles and the increasing import of used cars, which intensifies the problem of the number of waste vehicles. On average, a motor vehicle is in active use for a period of 10 to 15 years. Individual phases of its life cycle are indicated differently, using multiple parameters. All phases are influenced by many factors, but this paper focuses on the phases of active use and the end of life of a motor vehicle. This paper investigates these two phases in terms of the influencing elements. The main aim of this study is to lay the foundations for making adequate decisions on how to handle end-of-life vehicles, from the perspective of their drivers. The study includes performing quantitative research analysis via the k-means clustering technique on a sample of 1240 drivers (private and commercial vehicles), in order to draw concrete conclusions through appropriate statistical analysis. The key findings suggest that different market, business, and environment indicators define the phases of active use and end of life, throughout the life cycle of a motor vehicle. Future research will expand the sample to surrounding countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Vujadin Vesovic & Dragutin Jovanovic & Milos Arsic & Zoran Avramovic & Svetozar Sofijanic & Boban Djorovic & Natasa Gospic & Nena Tomovic & Dragan Milosevic & Mladen Dobric & Sinisa Arsic & Dragan Kos, 2022. "Identification of the Right Moment for Motor Vehicle Replacement—Life-Cycle Analysis in Serbia and Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2744-:d:759141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominik Jasiński & James Meredith & Kerry Kirwan, 2021. "Sustainable development model for measuring and managing sustainability in the automotive sector," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1123-1137, November.
    2. Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2007. "Life Cycle Assessment Practices: Benchmarking Selected European Automobile Manufacturers," Post-Print halshs-00205034, HAL.
    3. Giuseppe Volpato & Andrea Stocchetti, 2008. "Managing product life cycle in the auto industry: evaluating carmakers effectiveness," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 22-41.
    4. Ana M. Aizcorbe & James T. Hickman & Martha Starr-McCluer, 2003. "The replacement demand for motor vehicles: evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2003-44, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. Kamilė Petrauskienė & Arvydas Galinis & Daina Kliaugaitė & Jolanta Dvarionienė, 2021. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle and Cost Assessment of Electric, Hybrid, and Conventional Vehicles in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Ksenija Denčić-Mihajlov & Mladen Krstić & Dejan Spasić, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis as a Tool in Environmental Policy for Sustainability: The Case of Waste Recycling Projects in the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Svetozar Slobodan Sofijanic & Sinisa Milos Arsic & Dragutin Jovanovic & Milos Zivko Arsic & Safet Kalac & Zoran Ribaric & Dragan Kostadinovic & Velibor Peulic & Dragana Rosulj & Tibor Fazekas & Srdjan, 2021. "Influence of Business-Operational Performances and Company Size on CO 2 Emissions Decrease-Case of Serbian Road Transport Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Lei Yang & Caixia Hao & Yina Chai, 2018. "Life Cycle Assessment of Commercial Delivery Trucks: Diesel, Plug-In Electric, and Battery-Swap Electric," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Troy R. Hawkins & Bhawna Singh & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez & Anders Hammer Strømman, 2013. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(1), pages 53-64, February.
    10. Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2007. "Life Cycle Assessment Practices: Benchmarking Selected European Automobile Manufacturers," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-00205034, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cabrera-Jiménez, Richard & Mateo, Josep Maria & Jiménez, Laureano & Pozo, Carlos, 2025. "Prospective life-cycle assessment of sustainable alternatives for road freight transport," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Maxwell Woody & Michael T. Craig & Parth T. Vaishnav & Geoffrey M. Lewis & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2022. "Optimizing future cost and emissions of electric delivery vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1108-1122, June.
    3. Annekatrin Lehmann & Markus Berger & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Life Cycle Based CO2 Emission Credits: Options for Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Current Tailpipe Emissions Regulation in the Automotive Industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1066-1079, October.
    4. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    5. Ghotge, Rishabh & van Wijk, Ad & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Off-grid solar charging of electric vehicles at long-term parking locations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    7. Huang, Hai-chao & He, Hong-di & Peng, Zhong-ren, 2024. "Urban-scale estimation model of carbon emissions for ride-hailing electric vehicles during operational phase," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    9. Lefeng, Shi & Shengnan, Lv & Chunxiu, Liu & Yue, Zhou & Cipcigan, Liana & Acker, Thomas L., 2020. "A framework for electric vehicle power supply chain development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Lipson, Matthew M. & Chard, Rose, 2019. "Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 495-504.
    11. Will, Christian & Zimmermann, Florian & Ensslen, Axel & Fraunholz, Christoph & Jochem, Patrick & Keles, Dogan, 2024. "Can electric vehicle charging be carbon neutral? Uniting smart charging and renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    12. Viktor Slednev & Patrick Jochem & Wolf Fichtner, 2022. "Impacts of electric vehicles on the European high and extra high voltage power grid," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 824-837, June.
    13. Hyunseung Oh, 2019. "The Role of Durables Replacement and Second‐Hand Markets in a Business‐Cycle Model," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 51(4), pages 761-786, June.
    14. Tomer Fishman & Rupert J. Myers & Orlando Rios & T.E. Graedel, 2018. "Implications of Emerging Vehicle Technologies on Rare Earth Supply and Demand in the United States," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Kalghatgi, Gautam, 2018. "Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 965-974.
    16. Lybbert, M. & Ghaemi, Z. & Balaji, A.K. & Warren, R., 2021. "Integrating life cycle assessment and electrochemical modeling to study the effects of cell design and operating conditions on the environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Ye, Rui-Ke & Gao, Zhuang-Fei & Fang, Kai & Liu, Kang-Li & Chen, Jia-Wei, 2021. "Moving from subsidy stimulation to endogenous development: A system dynamics analysis of China's NEVs in the post-subsidy era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. José Alberto Fuinhas & Matheus Koengkan & Nuno Carlos Leitão & Chinazaekpere Nwani & Gizem Uzuner & Fatemeh Dehdar & Stefania Relva & Drielli Peyerl, 2021. "Effect of Battery Electric Vehicles on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 29 European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    19. Zhou, Xi-Yin & Xu, Zhicheng & Zheng, Jialin & Zhou, Ya & Lei, Kun & Fu, Jiafeng & Khu, Soon-Thiam & Yang, Junfeng, 2023. "Internal spillover effect of carbon emission between transportation sectors and electricity generation sectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 356-366.
    20. Cotterman, Turner & Fuchs, Erica R.H. & Whitefoot, Kate S. & Combemale, Christophe, 2024. "The transition to electrified vehicles: Evaluating the labor demand of manufacturing conventional versus battery electric vehicle powertrains," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2744-:d:759141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.