IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15923-d988096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Provincial Regions in China Should Give Priority to the Redevelopment of Abandoned Coal Mines? A Redevelopment Potential Evaluation Based Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yuliang Yang

    (School of Coal Engingeering, Shanxi Datong University, Datong 037003, China
    School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chaoqun Cui

    (School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    School of Mining and Geomatics Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China)

Abstract

Abandoned mines have a double nature consisting of resources and assets, and their rational redevelopment is one of the most important practices of the recycling economy. To direct the layout of the regional abandoned mine redevelopment, this paper constructs a comprehensive assessment framework for abandoned mine redevelopment potential based on the driving force–state–response (DSR) model. It is quantitatively evaluated by three-dimensional cloud models, and the results are coupled using a four-quadrant approach. From the perspective of space control, this paper proposes classification principles of redevelopment potential and redevelopment sequence and summarizes the important policy implementations for each category. The paper studies the redevelopment potential of abandoned mines from the provincial perspective in 25 coal-producing provinces of China. The results indicate that not all areas with high resource potential are suitable for redevelopment. In the northern and western regions, the regional abandoned mines have high resource potential and strong redevelopment drivers. However, the spatial pattern of the suitability of the development conditions is not distributed in the same way as the resources. The distribution of the abandoned mine redevelopment potential reveals that the eastern and east-central regions should give priority to the construction of demonstration projects. Different driving force scenarios confirm that most provinces have no obvious driving factor preference, with a few exceptions. This evaluation model is established from a more comprehensive perspective and is a valuable aid for decision makers when arranging abandoned mine regeneration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuliang Yang & Chaoqun Cui, 2022. "Which Provincial Regions in China Should Give Priority to the Redevelopment of Abandoned Coal Mines? A Redevelopment Potential Evaluation Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15923-:d:988096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pouran, Hamid M., 2018. "From collapsed coal mines to floating solar farms, why China's new power stations matter," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 414-420.
    2. Wang, Ran & Cheng, Jinhua & Zhu, Yali & Lu, Peixin, 2017. "Evaluation on the coupling coordination of resources and environment carrying capacity in Chinese mining economic zones," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 20-25.
    3. Unger, C.J. & Lechner, A.M. & Kenway, J. & Glenn, V. & Walton, A., 2015. "A jurisdictional maturity model for risk management, accountability and continual improvement of abandoned mine remediation programs," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Lee, Chia-Hao & Chou, Pei-I, 2018. "Financial openness and market liquidity in emerging markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 124-130.
    5. Miremadi, I. & Saboohi, Y. & Arasti, M., 2019. "The influence of public R&D and knowledge spillovers on the development of renewable energy sources: The case of the Nordic countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 450-463.
    6. Zhu, Bangzhu & Zhang, Mengfan & Zhou, Yanhua & Wang, Ping & Sheng, Jichuan & He, Kaijian & Wei, Yi-Ming & Xie, Rui, 2019. "Exploring the effect of industrial structure adjustment on interprovincial green development efficiency in China: A novel integrated approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Zhang, Xiaohan & Winchester, Niven & Zhang, Xiliang, 2017. "The future of coal in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 644-652.
    8. Lin, Jiang & Fridley, David & Lu, Hongyou & Price, Lynn & Zhou, Nan, 2018. "Has coal use peaked in China: Near-term trends in China's coal consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 208-214.
    9. Wang, Delu & Wan, Kaidi & Song, Xuefeng, 2018. "Quota allocation of coal overcapacity reduction among provinces in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 170-181.
    10. Groth, Christian & Schou, Poul, 2007. "Growth and non-renewable resources: The different roles of capital and resource taxes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 80-98, January.
    11. Volk, Rebekka & Müller, Richard & Reinhardt, Joachim & Schultmann, Frank, 2019. "An Integrated Material Flows, Stakeholders and Policies Approach to Identify and Exploit Regional Resource Potentials," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 292-320.
    12. Caulk, Robert A. & Tomac, Ingrid, 2017. "Reuse of abandoned oil and gas wells for geothermal energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 388-397.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Weike & Meng, Jia & Tian, Xiaoli, 2020. "Does de-capacity policy enhance the total factor productivity of China's coal companies? A Regression Discontinuity design," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Zhang, Rui & Qie, Xiaotong & Hu, Yanyong & Chen, Xue, 2022. "Does de-capacity policy promote the efficient and green development of the coal industry? –Based on the evidence of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Yang, Qing & Zhang, Lei & Zou, Shaohui & Zhang, Jinsuo, 2020. "Intertemporal optimization of the coal production capacity in China in terms of uncertain demand, economy, environment, and energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Carlson, D'Arcy & Robinson, Stacy-ann & Blair, Catherine & McDonough, Marjorie, 2021. "China's climate ambition: Revisiting its First Nationally Determined Contribution and centering a just transition to clean energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Wang, Delu & Wan, Kaidi & Song, Xuefeng & Liu, Yun, 2019. "Provincial allocation of coal de-capacity targets in China in terms of cost, efficiency, and fairness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 109-128.
    6. Ikefuji, Masako & Horii, Ryo, 2012. "Natural disasters in a two-sector model of endogenous growth," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(9-10), pages 784-796.
    7. Ke Liu & Yurong Qiao & Qian Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of China’s Industrial Green Development Efficiency and Driving Factors: Research Based on MGWR," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Putra, Zulfan A. & Muraza, Oki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2021. "Numerical evaluation, process design and techno-economic analysis of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil wells in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 868-879.
    9. Senhua Huang & Lingming Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Urban Total-Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from 275 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    11. Yuan, Shenguo & Wu, Zhouheng & Liu, Lanfeng, 2022. "The effects of financial openness and financial efficiency on Chinese macroeconomic volatilities," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Zhou, Yicheng, 2021. "How does vertical fiscal imbalance affect the upgrading of industrial structure? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Yuan, Ying & Du, Xinyu, 2023. "Dynamic spillovers across global stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from jumps and higher moments," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 628(C).
    15. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Wu, Haitao, 2022. "The role of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on green total factor energy efficiency: Does institutional quality matters? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    16. Tolliver, Clarence & Keeley, Alexander Ryota & Managi, Shunsuke, 2020. "Policy targets behind green bonds for renewable energy: Do climate commitments matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Ling Cheng & Haiyang Cui & Tian Liang & Dan Huang & Yuanxia Su & Zhiyong Zhang & Chuanhao Wen, 2023. "Study on the Trade-Off Synergy Relationship of “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions in Chinese Counties: A Case Study of Chongqing Municipality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, May.
    18. Zhai, Yijie & Ma, Xiaotian & Gao, Feng & Zhang, Tianzuo & Hong, Jinglan & Zhang, Xu & Yuan, Xueliang & Li, Xiangzhi, 2020. "Is energy the key to pursuing clean air and water at the city level? A case study of Jinan City, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Dehghan Shabani, Zahra, 2020. "Do renewable energy production spillovers matter in the EU?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 786-796.
    20. Wang, Qiang & Song, Xiaoxin, 2021. "How UK farewell to coal – Insight from multi-regional input-output and logarithmic mean divisia index analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15923-:d:988096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.