IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15117-d973211.html

Can Mixed Land Use Reduce CO 2 Emissions? A Case Study of 268 Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Qixuan Li

    (School of Public Administration, Hunan University, Changsha 410012, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xingli Chen

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410012, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sheng Jiao

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410012, China)

  • Wenmei Song

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410012, China)

  • Wenke Zong

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410012, China)

  • Yanhe Niu

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410012, China)

Abstract

Land is the carrier of human economic activities, and its utilization has a profound impact on CO 2 emissions. With the advancement of urbanization, mixed land use has become a universal feature of cities. Analyzing the impact of mixed land use on CO 2 emissions is one of the prominent premises for coordinating urban development and the ecological environment. Using information entropy of land use structure (IELUS) to reflect its mixing degree, it was found that the relationship between IELUS and CO 2 emissions presents a positive U-shaped curve. Additionally, when IELUS is less than 0.351, they are negatively correlated, and vice versa. This means that cities can appropriately shift toward a higher degree of a mixed land use pattern to alleviate their environmental pressure. Further research shows that the spatial spillover effect will dilute the impact of mixed land use on CO 2 emissions. Meanwhile, improving production efficiency and increasing public transport travel are significant ways in a mixed land use model to reduce CO 2 emissions. Overall, this study provides a reference for the rational allocation of low-carbon land use systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Qixuan Li & Xingli Chen & Sheng Jiao & Wenmei Song & Wenke Zong & Yanhe Niu, 2022. "Can Mixed Land Use Reduce CO 2 Emissions? A Case Study of 268 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15117-:d:973211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Paul Elhorst & Sandy Fréret, 2009. "Evidence Of Political Yardstick Competition In France Using A Two‐Regime Spatial Durbin Model With Fixed Effects," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 931-951, December.
    2. Halicioglu, Ferda, 2009. "An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1156-1164, March.
    3. Velázquez, J. & Gutiérrez, J. & Hernando, A. & García-Abril, A. & Martín, M.A. & Irastorza, P., 2018. "Measuring mosaic diversity based on land use map in the region of Madrid, Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 329-334.
    4. Weiting Xiong & Zhicheng Liu & Shaojian Wang & Yingcheng Li, 2020. "Visualizing the evolution of per capita carbon emissions of Chinese cities, 2001–2016," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 702-706, June.
    5. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    6. Eun Yeong Seong & Nam Hwi Lee & Chang Gyu Choi, 2021. "Relationship between Land Use Mix and Walking Choice in High-Density Cities: A Review of Walking in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Zhang, Jianjun & Fu, Meichen & Zhang, Zhongya & Tao, Jin & Fu, Wei, 2014. "A trade-off approach of optimal land allocation between socio-economic development and ecological stability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 175-187.
    8. Xia, Chuyu & Chen, Bin, 2020. "Urban land-carbon nexus based on ecological network analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Kumar, Surender, 2006. "Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 280-293, February.
    10. Nathan Nunn & Diego Puga, 2012. "Ruggedness: The Blessing of Bad Geography in Africa," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 20-36, February.
    11. Song, Yan & Knaap, Gerrit-Jan, 2004. "Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 663-680, November.
    12. Heping Li & Tao Lin, 2022. "Do Land Use Structure Changes Impact Regional Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Econometric Study in Sichuan Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Shi, Kaifang & Chen, Yun & Li, Linyi & Huang, Chang, 2018. "Spatiotemporal variations of urban CO2 emissions in China: A multiscale perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 218-229.
    14. Aboumahboub, Tino & Schaber, Katrin & Wagner, Ulrich & Hamacher, Thomas, 2012. "On the CO2 emissions of the global electricity supply sector and the influence of renewable power-modeling and optimization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 297-314.
    15. Hui Wang & Guifen Liu & Kaifang Shi, 2019. "What Are the Driving Forces of Urban CO 2 Emissions in China? A Refined Scale Analysis between National and Urban Agglomeration Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Zhao, Min & Tan, Lirong & Zhang, Weiguo & Ji, Minhe & Liu, Yuan & Yu, Lizhong, 2010. "Decomposing the influencing factors of industrial carbon emissions in Shanghai using the LMDI method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2505-2510.
    17. Wang, Shaojian & Liu, Xiaoping & Zhou, Chunshan & Hu, Jincan & Ou, Jinpei, 2017. "Examining the impacts of socioeconomic factors, urban form, and transportation networks on CO2 emissions in China’s megacities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 189-200.
    18. Du, Kerui & Li, Pengzhen & Yan, Zheming, 2019. "Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 297-303.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trang Dao Thi Thu & Huyen Ngo Khanh & Phuong Tran Thi, 2026. "Historical Analysis of Land-use Changes in Vietnam’s Red River Delta: Bayesian Network Approach to Land Policies and Sustainable Development," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 30(2), pages 1-38, June.
    2. Qiao, Renlu & Wu, Zhiqiang & Jiang, Qingrui & Liu, Xiaochang & Gao, Shuo & Xia, Li & Yang, Tianren, 2024. "The nonlinear influence of land conveyance on urban carbon emissions: An interpretable ensemble learning-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.
    2. Gao, Jiong & Ma, Shoufeng & Zou, Hongyang & Du, Huibin, 2023. "How does population agglomeration influence the adoption of new energy vehicles? Evidence from 290 cities in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Lin, Boqiang & Ma, Ruiyang, 2022. "Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Li, Li & Hong, Xuefei & Peng, Ke, 2019. "A spatial panel analysis of carbon emissions, economic growth and high-technology industry in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 83-92.
    5. Ha Na Im & Chang Gyu Choi, 2019. "The hidden side of the entropy-based land-use mix index: Clarifying the relationship between pedestrian volume and land-use mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1865-1881, July.
    6. Cai, Bofeng & Lu, Jun & Wang, Jinnan & Dong, Huijuan & Liu, Xiaoman & Chen, Yang & Chen, Zhanming & Cong, Jianhui & Cui, Zhipeng & Dai, Chunyan & Fang, Kai & Feng, Tong & Guo, Jie & Li, Fen & Meng, Fa, 2019. "A benchmark city-level carbon dioxide emission inventory for China in 2005," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 659-673.
    7. Hu, Ting & Huang, Xin, 2019. "A novel locally adaptive method for modeling the spatiotemporal dynamics of global electric power consumption based on DMSP-OLS nighttime stable light data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 778-792.
    8. Wang, Shaojian & Shi, Chenyi & Fang, Chuanglin & Feng, Kuishuang, 2019. "Examining the spatial variations of determinants of energy-related CO2 emissions in China at the city level using Geographically Weighted Regression Model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 95-105.
    9. Ying Han & Baoling Jin & Xiaoyuan Qi & Huasen Zhou, 2021. "Influential Factors and Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Carbon Intensity on Industrial Sectors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Yuning Wang & Duanfang Lu & David Levinson, 2023. "Equilibrium or imbalance? Rail Transit and Land Use Mix in Station Areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2403-2421, December.
    11. Changlong Sun & Yongli Zhang & Wenwen Ma & Rong Wu & Shaojian Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Urban Form on Carbon Emissions: A Comprehensive Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Lin, Boqiang & Sai, Rockson, 2022. "Sustainable transitioning in Africa: A historical evaluation of energy productivity changes and determinants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    13. Chiu, Ching-Ren & Liou, Je-Liang & Wu, Pei-Ing & Fang, Chen-Ling, 2012. "Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1392-1399.
    14. Rebaz Khoshnaw, 2023. "Evaluating Mixed Land Use and Connectivity: A Case Study of Five Neighborhoods in Erbil City, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Changjian Wang & Fei Wang & Gengzhi Huang & Yang Wang & Xinlin Zhang & Yuyao Ye & Xiaojie Lin & Zhongwu Zhang, 2021. "Examining the Dynamics and Determinants of Energy Consumption in China’s Megacity Based on Industrial and Residential Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Hui Wang & Guifen Liu & Kaifang Shi, 2019. "What Are the Driving Forces of Urban CO 2 Emissions in China? A Refined Scale Analysis between National and Urban Agglomeration Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Jiacheng Jiao & John Rollo & Baibai Fu, 2021. "The Hidden Characteristics of Land-Use Mix Indices: An Overview and Validity Analysis Based on the Land Use in Melbourne, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Yan, Zheming & Zou, Baoling & Du, Kerui & Li, Ke, 2020. "Do renewable energy technology innovations promote China's green productivity growth? Fresh evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Weber, Christoph & Falchi, Alice & Chassagnon-Haned, Naciba, 2025. "Is innovation good for the environment? A macro-level analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Yingqun Zhang & Rui Song & Rob van Nes & Shiwei He & Weichuan Yin, 2019. "Identifying Urban Structure Based on Transit-Oriented Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15117-:d:973211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.