IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v52y2020i4p702-706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing the evolution of per capita carbon emissions of Chinese cities, 2001–2016

Author

Listed:
  • Weiting Xiong

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, China; Media lab, MIT, USA)

  • Zhicheng Liu

    (School of Information Science and Engineering, Southeast University, China)

  • Shaojian Wang

    (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urbanization and Geo-simulation, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT, USA)

  • Yingcheng Li

Abstract

As the world’s largest carbon emitter, China is under great pressure to cut down carbon emissions. Understanding the evolution of carbon emissions across Chinese cities is important for policymakers when allocating carbon emission quota among these cities. This paper draws upon the Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO 2 to calculate city-level per capita carbon emissions in China from 2001 to 2016. Overall, we find that per capita carbon emissions of Chinese cities have been generally on the rise during the 2001–2016 period. However, there has been on average a modest decline in per capita carbon emissions of cities in China’s Yangtze River Delta region and Pearl River Delta region from 2011 to 2016, after a remarkable increase during the 2001–2011 period. Besides, the average north-south gap has been enlarged, with northern cities having a relatively higher level of per capita carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiting Xiong & Zhicheng Liu & Shaojian Wang & Yingcheng Li, 2020. "Visualizing the evolution of per capita carbon emissions of Chinese cities, 2001–2016," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 702-706, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:4:p:702-706
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19881665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19881665
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X19881665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingcheng Li & Nicholas Phelps, 2018. "Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 443-460, February.
    2. Yingcheng Li & Nicholas A. Phelps, 2017. "Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River Delta megalopolis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(7), pages 1035-1047, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qixuan Li & Xingli Chen & Sheng Jiao & Wenmei Song & Wenke Zong & Yanhe Niu, 2022. "Can Mixed Land Use Reduce CO 2 Emissions? A Case Study of 268 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Cheng, Lu & Mi, Zhifu & Sudmant, Andrew & Coffman, D'Maris, 2022. "Bigger cities better climate? Results from an analysis of urban areas in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Li, Kai & Yan, Yaxue & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2021. "Carbon-abatement policies, investment preferences, and directed technological change: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue, Wenze & Wang, Tianyu & Liu, Yong & Zhang, Qun & Ye, Xinyue, 2019. "Mismatch of morphological and functional polycentricity in Chinese cities: An evidence from land development and functional linkage," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Feng Shi & Yingcheng Li & Weiting Xiong, 2020. "Mapping the distribution of foreign applications for patents in China, 1987–2017," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 825-828, August.
    3. Chengliang Liu & Caicheng Niu & Ji Han, 2019. "Spatial Dynamics of Intercity Technology Transfer Networks in China’s Three Urban Agglomerations: A Patent Transaction Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Haitao Ma & Yingcheng Li & Xiaodong Huang, 2021. "Proximity and the evolving knowledge polycentricity of megalopolitan science: Evidence from China’s Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, 1990–2016," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2405-2423, September.
    5. Shuaishuai Han & Changhong Miao, 2022. "Does a Polycentric Spatial Structure Help to Reduce Industry Emissions?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Wen Chen & Komali Yenneti & Yehua Dennis Wei & Feng Yuan & Jiawei Wu & Jinlong Gao, 2019. "Polycentricity in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration (YRDUA): More Cohesion or More Disparities?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Meiqi Jiao & Debin Du & Wentian Shi & Chunguang Hou & Qinchang Gui, 2021. "Dynamic Absorptive Capability and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2019. "Network criticality and the node-place-design model: Classifying metro station areas in Greater London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Shixiang Wang & Minyuan Zhao, 2018. "A tale of two distances: a study of technological distance, geographic distance and multilocation firms," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 1091-1120.
    10. Siliang Guo & Heng Ma, 2022. "Can the Spatial Function Division of Urbanization Promote Regional Coordinated Development? Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Weikai Wang & Ya Ping Wang & Keith Kintrea, 2020. "The (Re)Making of Polycentricity in China's Planning Discourse: The Case of Tianjin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 857-875, September.
    12. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2021. "Understanding the roles of rail stations: Insights from network approaches in the London metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Wei Li & Desheng Xue & Xu Huang, 2018. "The Role of Manufacturing in Sustainable Economic Development: A Case of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Daidai Shen & Jean-Claude Thill & Jiuwen Sun, 2020. "Are Chinese Cities Oversized?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 43(6), pages 632-654, November.
    15. Weiyang Zhang & Ben Derudder, 2019. "How sensitive are measures of polycentricity to the choice of ‘centres’? A methodological and empirical exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3339-3357, December.
    16. Zhijun Feng & Hechang Cai & Wen Zhou, 2020. "Structural Characteristics and Spatial Patterns of the Technology Transfer Network in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Yang Ruilin & Bathelt Harald, 2023. "How outward FDIs affect income: experiences from Chinese city-regions," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 47-64, May.
    18. Xiang Yan & Yongchun Huang, 2021. "Is there a nonlinear economic threshold effect of financial development on the efficiency of sci‐tech innovation? An empirical test from the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 1387-1409, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:52:y:2020:i:4:p:702-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.