IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13694-d950151.html

The Optimal Urban Scale from Different Perspectives and under Different Development Goals Based on the CES Utility Function

Author

Listed:
  • Yunzhu He

    (School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Abstract

To analyze the differences in the optimal urban scale of a country, a government, and residents under different urban development goals and to provide a reference for urban development, an urban development model is constructed based on the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) utility function. The objective function includes four indicators: the economic level, the traffic level, environmental quality, and living conditions. The urban development model is constructed by integrating an urban road planning model, bus route planning model, land use model, and four-stage traffic sharing and traffic allocation model. Based on the setting of different development goals, this model is used to calculate the urban utility value perceived by each stakeholder at different urban scales. Through comparative analysis, we determine the following: (1) When the urban development goals are different, the optimal urban scale of residents and the government differs greatly, and the optimal scale of the country differs very little. (2) When facing the same development goal, the optimal urban scales of the three stakeholders are not the same. However, the three stakeholders are closely related to urban development. Therefore, the selection of the optimal urban scale should comprehensively consider the interests of the three stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunzhu He, 2022. "The Optimal Urban Scale from Different Perspectives and under Different Development Goals Based on the CES Utility Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13694-:d:950151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13694/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13694/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glaeser, Edward L. & Kahn, Matthew E., 2004. "Sprawl and urban growth," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 56, pages 2481-2527, Elsevier.
    2. Martin, Philippe & Mayer, Thierry & Mayneris, Florian, 2011. "Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 182-195, March.
    3. Dixit, Avinash K & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1977. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(3), pages 297-308, June.
    4. Cai, Ning & Ma, Hai-Ying & Khan, M. Junaid, 2015. "Agent-based model for rural–urban migration: A dynamic consideration," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 806-813.
    5. Chen, Ying & Henderson, J. Vernon & Cai, Wei, 2017. "Political favoritism in China’s capital markets and its effect on city sizes," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 69-87.
    6. Susanne A. Frick & Andrés Rodríguez†Pose, 2018. "Big or Small Cities? On city size and economic growth," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 4-32, March.
    7. Geroliminis, Nikolas & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2008. "Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 759-770, November.
    8. Mills, Edwin S & Ferranti, David M, 1971. "Market Choices and Optimum City Size," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 340-345, May.
    9. Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2013. "One or infinite optimal city sizes? In search of an equilibrium size for cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(2), pages 309-341, October.
    10. Xiao-Ping Zheng, 2007. "Measurement of Optimal City Sizes in Japan: A Surplus Function Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(5-6), pages 939-951, May.
    11. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Frick, Susanne, 2017. "Big or small cities? On city size and economic growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 12324, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andres Rodriguez-Pose, 2025. "Why size really doesn't matter: From megacity myths to place-sensitive prosperity," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2539, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2025.
    2. Roberto Ganau & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2022. "Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1275-1299, May.
    3. Duranton, Gilles & Puga, Diego, 2014. "The Growth of Cities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 781-853, Elsevier.
    4. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Roberto Camagni & Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2016. "Static vs. dynamic agglomeration economies. Spatial context and structural evolution behind urban growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 133-158, March.
    5. Jorge Díaz-Lanchas & Peter Mulder, 2021. "Does decentralization of governance promote urban diversity? Evidence from Spain," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 1111-1128, June.
    6. Kostas Rontos & Barbara Ermini & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Enlarging the divide? Per-Capita Income as a measure of social inequalities in a southern European City," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 345-361, February.
    7. Guo, Bingnan & Wang, Yu & Zhang, Hao & Liang, Chunyan & Feng, Yu & Hu, Feng, 2023. "Impact of the digital economy on high-quality urban economic development: Evidence from Chinese cities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Seyed Peyman Asadi & Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2019. "Lagging-behind Areas as a Challenge to the Regional Development Strategy: What Insights can New and Evolutionary Economic Geography Offer?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1923, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2019.
    9. Li He & Jiangyin Wang & Zhiyong Song & Yue Yu & Jinmiao Lu, 2025. "The Gaze of China’s Chief Officials: Do Cross-Level Political Positions Suppress Basic Public Service Performance?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    10. Prottoy Akbar & Victor Couture & Gilles Duranton & Adam Storeygard, 2023. "Mobility and Congestion in Urban India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(4), pages 1083-1111, April.
    11. John Paul Clifford & Frank Crowley & Justin Doran & Declan Jordan, 2025. "The role of FDI-focused business and technology parks in promoting local employment growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2577921-257, December.
    12. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2017. "The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)," CEPR Discussion Papers 12473, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    13. repec:ctc:sdimse:dime19_03 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Shao-ling He & Yuan Zhong & Wei-wei He, 2024. "The impact of city size on income inclusive growth: A human capital perspective and evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Isabel del Arco & Anabel Ramos-Pla & Gabriel Zsembinszki & Alvaro de Gracia & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Implementing SDGs to a Sustainable Rural Village Development from Community Empowerment: Linking Energy, Education, Innovation, and Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Hongjian Su & Houkai Wei & Jian Zhao, 2017. "Density effect and optimum density of the urban population in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1760-1777, May.
    17. Fabien Candau, 2008. "Entrepreneurs' Location Choice And Public Policies: A Survey Of The New Economic Geography," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 909-952, December.
    18. Henderson, J. Vernon & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2024. "Urban and spatial economics after 50 years," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Zhu, Lu & He, Yong & Chen, Chunfeng & Liao, Nuo, 2026. "A Coal in the Snow or the Icing on the Cake? China’s development zone upgrading and regional economic resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Anas, Alex & Rhee, Hyok-Joo, 2006. "Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 510-541, July.
    21. David Castells‐Quintana & Vicente Royuela & Paolo Veneri, 2020. "Inequality and city size: An analysis for OECD functional urban areas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(4), pages 1045-1064, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13694-:d:950151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.