IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6064-d817211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electric Cars in Brazil: An Analysis of Core Green Technologies and the Transition Process

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Harmi Takiya

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Cláudia Aparecida Soares Machado

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-070, SP, Brazil)

  • José Carlos Curvelo Santana

    (Department of Management Engineering, Federal University of ABC, Alameda das Universidades, Anchieta, São Bernardo do Campo 09606-045, SP, Brazil)

  • José Alberto Quintanilha

    (Institute of Energy and Environment, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

  • Fernando Tobal Berssaneti

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

This paper explores the transition to electric cars in Brazil. The country has been successful to reduce its carbon footprint using biofuels, but it is facing a dilemma in vehicle electrification. It cannot shift abruptly to battery electric vehicles, as current consumers are unable to afford them and investment in recharging infrastructure is uncertain. However, it has a significant manufacturing base, and it cannot isolate itself from global industrial trends. This study relies on the inductive case study method, identifying the core green technologies in vehicle electrification and extrapolating their trends, to explain how the transition process is feasible. The emergence of a dominant design (set of core technologies defining a product category and adopted by the majority of players in the market) in small and affordable segments is essential for the diffusion of electric cars in developing countries. Biofuel hybrid technologies may support the transition. The Brazilian industry can engage in electric vehicle development by designing small cars based on global architectures, targeting consumers in emerging markets. The article contributes by using a dominant design core technologies framework to explain and map the transition to electric vehicles in developing countries, supporting academic research, government, and industry planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura & Harmi Takiya & Cláudia Aparecida Soares Machado & José Carlos Curvelo Santana & José Alberto Quintanilha & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti, 2022. "Electric Cars in Brazil: An Analysis of Core Green Technologies and the Transition Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6064-:d:817211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Xiong & Shuyan Zhao & Yan Meng & Lu Xu & Seong-Young Kim, 2022. "How latecomers catch up to build an energy-saving industry : The case of the Chinese electric vehicle industry 1995–2018," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03469528, HAL.
    2. MacDuffie, John Paul, 2018. "Response to Perkins and Murmann: Pay Attention to What Is and Isn't Unique about Tesla," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 481-489, September.
    3. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2016. "Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 625-648, April.
    4. Cláudia A. Soares Machado & Harmi Takiya & Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura & José Alberto Quintanilha & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti, 2020. "Placement of Infrastructure for Urban Electromobility: A Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Tianxu Chen & Lihong Qian & Vadake Narayanan, 2017. "Battle on the Wrong Field? Entrant Type, Dominant Designs, and Technology Exit," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(13), pages 2579-2598, December.
    6. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    7. Xiong, Jie & Zhao, Shuyan & Meng, Yan & Xu, Lu & Kim, Seong-Young, 2022. "How latecomers catch up to build an energy-saving industry: The case of the Chinese electric vehicle industry 1995–2018," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Battaglia, Riccardo David, 2015. "Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 162-175.
    9. Fabienne T. Schiavo & Rodrigo F. Calili & Claudio F. de Magalhães & Isabel C. G. Fróes, 2021. "The Meaning of Electric Cars in the Context of Sustainable Transition in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Adriana Marotti De Mello & Roberto Marx & Adcley Souza, 2013. "Exploring scenarios for the possibility of developing design and production competencies of electrical vehicles in Brazil," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 289-314.
    11. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Axsen, Jonn, 2018. "Functional, symbolic and societal frames for automobility: Implications for sustainability transitions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 730-746.
    12. Jie Xiong & Shuyan Zhao & Yan Meng & Lu Xu & Seong-Young Kim, 2022. "How latecomers catch up to build an energy-saving industry : The case of the Chinese electric vehicle industry 1995–2018," Post-Print hal-03469528, HAL.
    13. Alexandre Beaudet & François Larouche & Kamyab Amouzegar & Patrick Bouchard & Karim Zaghib, 2020. "Key Challenges and Opportunities for Recycling Electric Vehicle Battery Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-12, July.
    14. Nicholas Argyres & Lyda Bigelow & Jack A. Nickerson, 2015. "Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower's dilemma," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 216-234, February.
    15. Manel Arribas-Ibar & Petra A. Nylund & Alexander Brem, 2021. "The Risk of Dissolution of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems in Times of Crisis: The Electric Vehicle during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Bruno Jetin, 2020. "Who will control the electric vehicle market?," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 156-177.
    17. Sacchi, R. & Bauer, C. & Cox, B. & Mutel, C., 2022. "When, where and how can the electrification of passenger cars reduce greenhouse gas emissions?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Roberto Marx & Adriana Marotti De Mello, 2014. "New initiatives, trends and dilemmas for the Brazilian automotive industry: the case of Inovar Auto and its impacts on electromobility in Brazil," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(2), pages 138-157.
    19. Brem, Alexander & Nylund, Petra A. & Schuster, Gerd, 2016. "Innovation and de facto standardization: The influence of dominant design on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 79-88.
    20. Yu, Xiao & Sandhu, Navjot S. & Yang, Zhenyi & Zheng, Ming, 2020. "Suitability of energy sources for automotive application – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    21. Davide Castelvecchi, 2021. "Electric cars and batteries: how will the world produce enough?," Nature, Nature, vol. 596(7872), pages 336-339, August.
    22. Shahid Hussain & Mohamed A. Ahmed & Ki-Beom Lee & Young-Chon Kim, 2020. "Fuzzy Logic Weight Based Charging Scheme for Optimal Distribution of Charging Power among Electric Vehicles in a Parking Lot," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    23. Xiao-Guang Yang & Teng Liu & Chao-Yang Wang, 2021. "Thermally modulated lithium iron phosphate batteries for mass-market electric vehicles," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 176-185, February.
    24. Clayton M. Christensen & Rory McDonald & Elizabeth J. Altman & Jonathan E. Palmer, 2018. "Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1043-1078, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yossi Hadad & Baruch Keren & Dima Alberg, 2023. "An Expert System for Ranking and Matching Electric Vehicles to Customer Specifications and Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinar Ozcan & Douglas Hannah, 2020. "Social Origins of Great Strategies Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 193-217, September.
    2. Manel Arribas-Ibar & Petra A. Nylund & Alexander Brem, 2021. "The Risk of Dissolution of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems in Times of Crisis: The Electric Vehicle during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Lee Branstetter & Guangwei Li, 2023. "The Challenges of Chinese Industrial Policy," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 3, pages 77-113, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Khatua, Apalak & Ranjan Kumar, Rajeev & Kumar De, Supriya, 2023. "Institutional enablers of electric vehicle market: Evidence from 30 countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Pushpananthan, Gouthanan & Elmquist, Maria, 2022. "Joining forces to create value: The emergence of an innovation ecosystem," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Christopher L. Benson & Christopher L. Magee, 2018. "Data-Driven Investment Decision-Making: Applying Moore's Law and S-Curves to Business Strategies," Papers 1805.06339, arXiv.org.
    7. Yu, Liukai & Zheng, Junjun & Ma, Gang & Jiao, Yangyang, 2023. "Analyzing the evolution trend of energy conservation and carbon reduction in transportation with promoting electrification in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    8. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    9. Giones, Ferran & Brem, Alexander, 2017. "From toys to tools: The co-evolution of technological and entrepreneurial developments in the drone industry," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 875-884.
    10. Iizuka, Michiko & Hane, Gerald, 2021. "Transformation towards sustainable development goals: Role of innovation ecosystems for inclusive, disruptive advances in five Asian case studies," MERIT Working Papers 2021-001, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Jianlong Wu & Zhongji Yang & Xiaobo Hu & Hongqi Wang & Jing Huang, 2018. "Exploring Driving Forces of Sustainable Development of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry: An Analysis from the Perspective of an Innovation Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    13. Uzunca, Bilgehan & Sharapov, Dmitry & Tee, Richard, 2022. "Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    14. Brice Dattée & Oliver Alexy & Erkko Autio, 2018. "Maneuvering in Poor Visibility : How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High," Post-Print hal-02276702, HAL.
    15. Lütjen, Heiner & Schultz, Carsten & Tietze, Frank & Urmetzer, Florian, 2019. "Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 506-519.
    16. Jarryd Daymond & Eric Knight & Maria Rumyantseva & Steven Maguire, 2023. "Managing ecosystem emergence and evolution: Strategies for ecosystem architects," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus, 2022. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems in an interconnected world: emergence, governance and digitalization," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Walrave, Bob & Talmar, Madis & Podoynitsyna, Ksenia S. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Verbong, Geert P.J., 2018. "A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 103-113.
    19. Mark A. Phillips & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2018. "Exploring Emerging Ecosystem Boundaries: Defining ‘The Game’," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Rahul Kapoor & Thomas Klueter, 2021. "Unbundling and Managing Uncertainty Surrounding Emerging Technologies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-74, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6064-:d:817211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.