IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2268-d502251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the Virtual Learning Platform EDUKA on the Academic Performance of Primary School Children

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Kliziene

    (Educational Research Group, Institute of Social Science and Humanity, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Grazina Taujanskiene

    (Educational Research Group, Institute of Social Science and Humanity, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Aldona Augustiniene

    (Educational Research Group, Institute of Social Science and Humanity, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Berita Simonaitiene

    (Educational Research Group, Institute of Social Science and Humanity, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Gintautas Cibulskas

    (Educational Research Group, Institute of Social Science and Humanity, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The modern teaching/learning environment is, like never before, rich with digital teaching/learning technologies and tools that are becoming part of children’s daily lives. Background: In Lithuania, virtual teaching/learning platforms (environments for mathematics, knowledge of nature, history, and language practice) in primary education became more widely used approximately three years ago after the implementation and application of the virtual teaching/learning platform EDUKA. The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of the virtual teaching/learning platform EDUKA on the learning outcomes of primary-grade students in the subject of mathematics. Methods: In this study, a pre-test/middle-test/post-test experimental strategy was used to avoid any disruption of educational activities due to the random selection of children in each group. Mathematical diagnostic progress tests (MDPTs) are an objective way to measure skills and abilities. The MDPTs were divided into two sections: the tasks were allocated according to performance levels and the content, as well as fields of activity and cognitive skills. The assessment of all areas of activity was based on the primary school children’s performance (i.e., unsatisfactory, satisfactory, basic, and advanced). Results: An analysis of the results of the MDPTs showed that, across the seven possible tasks, both male and female seven-year-old children achieved satisfactory results (results were observed between groups) (post-test: control gathering (CG) 5.10; test gathering (EG) 5.04; p = 0.560), basic results (post-test: CG 6.28; EG 6.42; p = 0.630), and advanced results (post-test: CG 1.90; EG 2.27; p = 0.025). The differences between the pre-test and post-test advanced ( p = 0.038) and the pre-test and post-test basic ( p = 0.018) levels were found to increase. Conclusions: It was found that intensively integrating the virtual learning platform EDUKA into formal education—specifically in the subject of mathematics—had a significant impact on primary school children’s mathematical performance. In addition, after the experiment, a statistically significant difference was found ( p < 0.05) in primary school children with higher levels. The intervention in the experimental group (i.e., integration of the virtual learning platform into the formal mathematics learning process) had a positive impact on access to mathematics. Students’ math learning achievements were positive in progressive mathematics.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Kliziene & Grazina Taujanskiene & Aldona Augustiniene & Berita Simonaitiene & Gintautas Cibulskas, 2021. "The Impact of the Virtual Learning Platform EDUKA on the Academic Performance of Primary School Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2268-:d:502251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Napal & Ana María Mendióroz-Lacambra & Alicia Peñalva, 2020. "Sustainability Teaching Tools in the Digital Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Irina Kliziene & Ginas Cizauskas & Aldona Augustiniene & Saule Sipaviciene & Roma Aleksandraviciene, 2020. "The Relationship between School Age Children’s Academic Performance and Innovative Physical Education Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Blazar, David, 2015. "Effective teaching in elementary mathematics: Identifying classroom practices that support student achievement," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 16-29.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduard Edelhauser & Lucian Lupu-Dima, 2021. "One Year of Online Education in COVID-19 Age, a Challenge for the Romanian Education System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-32, July.
    2. Ali Saleh Alammary, 2022. "How to Decide the Proportion of Online to Face-to-Face Components of a Blended Course? A Delphi Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    3. Christos Sakkas & Stavroula Samartzi & Harilaos Koumaras, 2024. "A Prototype Implementation of a Virtual Platform with Robotic Integration and Machine Learning Capabilities for the Execution of Cognitive Psychology Experiments in Children," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 135-155, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aljawharah M. Aldosari & Hala F. Eid & Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, 2022. "A Proposed Strategy Based on Instructional Design Models through an LMS to Develop Online Learning in Higher Education Considering the Lockdown Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Vassilis Zakopoulos & Agoritsa Makri & Stamatios Ntanos & Stilianos Tampakis, 2023. "Drama/Theatre Performance in Education through the Use of Digital Technologies for Enhancing Students’ Sustainability Awareness: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Goldhaber, Dan & Krieg, John & Theobald, Roddy, 2020. "Effective like me? Does having a more productive mentor improve the productivity of mentees?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Simon Briole & Marc Gurgand & Eric Maurin & Sandra McNally & Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela & Daniel Santin, 2022. "The making of civic virtues: a school-based experiment in three countries," CEP Discussion Papers dp1830, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Xiangfei Ma & Inna Gryshova & Iryna Koshkalda & Anastasiia Suska & Rymma Gryshova & Alona Riasnianska & Olga Tupchii, 2022. "Necessity of Post-War Renewal of University Teachers’ Potential in Terms of Sustainable Development in Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Lavinia Dovleac & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Eliza Nichifor & Gabriel Brătucu, 2023. "Shaping the Inclusivity in the New Society by Enhancing the Digitainability of Sustainable Development Goals with Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. María Jesús Santos-Villalba & Juan José Leiva Olivencia & Magdalena Ramos Navas-Parejo & María Dolores Benítez-Márquez, 2020. "Higher Education Students’ Assessments towards Gamification and Sustainability: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Eduardo González-Cabañes & Trinidad García & Celestino Rodríguez & Marcelino Cuesta & José Carlos Núñez, 2020. "Learning and Emotional Outcomes after the Application of Invention Activities in a Sample of University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    9. David Blazar & Matthew A. Kraft, 2015. "Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students' Academic Behaviors and Mindsets," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c1c4216bd08f408fb6bdf16a3, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Simon Briole, 2019. "From Teacher Quality to Teaching Quality: Instructional Productivity and Teaching Practices in the US," Working Papers halshs-01993616, HAL.
    11. Buurman, Margaretha & Delfgaauw, Josse & Dur, Robert & Zoutenbier, Robin, 2020. "When do teachers respond to student feedback? Evidence from a field experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Fenoll, Ainoa Aparicio & Moscarola, Flavia Coda & Zaccagni, Sarah, 2021. "Mathematics camps: A gift for gifted students?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 738-751.
    13. Irina Kliziene & Ginas Cizauskas & Saule Sipaviciene & Roma Aleksandraviciene & Kristina Zaicenkoviene, 2021. "Effects of a Physical Education Program on Physical Activity and Emotional Well-Being among Primary School Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Thomas J. Kane & David Blazar & Hunter Gehlbach & Miriam Greenberg & David M. Quinn & Daniel Thal, 2020. "Can Video Technology Improve Teacher Evaluations? An Experimental Study," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 15(3), pages 397-427, Summer.
    15. Abd Hadi Mustaffa & Nur Zahidah Bahrudin & Siti Zaitun Saddam & Zetty Zahureen Mohd Yusoff, 2024. "Unlocking the Potential Research Directions in Effective Teaching: Insights from Bibliometric Analysis," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(1), pages 216-228.
    16. Raquel Barragán-Sánchez & María-Carmen Corujo-Vélez & Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez & Pedro Román-Graván, 2020. "Teaching Digital Competence and Eco-Responsible Use of Technologies: Development and Validation of a Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Ainoa Aparicio Fenoll & Sarah Zaccagni, 2021. "Gender Mix and Team Performance: Differences between Exogenously and Endogenously Formed Teams," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 646, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    18. Marilena Labianca, 2021. "Can GIS Foster Conscious and Critical Learning in Geography? An Application from Students to a Real Case Included in the National Strategy for Inner Areas: Monti Dauni, Apulia (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Salvador Baena-Morales & Rosabel Martinez-Roig & María J. Hernádez-Amorós, 2020. "Sustainability and Educational Technology—A Description of the Teaching Self-Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Alina Vogel & Martin Ulber, 2021. "Digitalizing Higher Education in Light of Sustainability and Rebound Effects—Surveys in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-29, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2268-:d:502251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.