IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12625-d679751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Hotel Employees’ Perception of CSR on Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Role of Job Level

Author

Listed:
  • Kum-Sik Oh

    (Division of Global & Interdisciplinary Studies, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea)

  • Juyeon Rachel Han

    (Department of Hotel Management, Cheju Halla University, Jeju 63092, Korea)

  • So Ra Park

    (Department of Tourism Management, Cheju Halla University, Jeju 63092, Korea)

Abstract

This study attempts to investigate the relationships among Korean hotel employees’ perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), their intrinsic motivations, and their organizational commitment (OC). The mediating effect of intrinsic motivation on the relationship between employees’ perception of customer- and employee-related CSR and OC is explored, and the moderating role of job level on the relationship between CSR perceptions and intrinsic motivation is tested. The data were collected via online survey, and the Hayes’ Process macro was used as an analysis tool. We found that (1) both types of CSR perceptions are important in creating intrinsic motivation and OC, (2) intrinsic motivation enhances OC, and (3) job level moderates the link between employee CSR perceptions and intrinsic motivation positively. Interestingly, we found that when customer-related CSR or employee-related CSR is high, the level of intrinsic motivation will significantly differ between managerial and non-managerial employees. This study’s results will contribute to the current literature on CSR, and will aid human resources departments that are considering CSR practices as a means to enhancing employee intrinsic motivation and OC.

Suggested Citation

  • Kum-Sik Oh & Juyeon Rachel Han & So Ra Park, 2021. "The Influence of Hotel Employees’ Perception of CSR on Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Role of Job Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12625-:d:679751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pål Børing, 2019. "The relationship between firm productivity, firm size and CSR objectives for innovations," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(3), pages 269-297, September.
    2. E. R. Osagie & R. Wesselink & V. Blok & T. Lans & M. Mulder, 2016. "Individual Competencies for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature and Practice Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 233-252, May.
    3. Madden, Laura & McMillan, Amy & Harris, Oneil, 2020. "Drivers of selectivity in family firms: Understanding the impact of age and ownership on CSR," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2).
    4. Jennifer Kunz, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees Motivation—Broadening the Perspective," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(2), pages 159-191, April.
    5. Muddassar Sarfraz & Wang Qun & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah & Adnan Tariq Alvi, 2018. "Employees’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Employee Outcomes: Mediating Role of Organizational Justice for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Nicoleta Sirghi & Ruxandra-Ioana Curea-Pitorac & Vasile-Petru Hategan, 2018. "Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Mahfuja Malik, 2015. "Value-Enhancing Capabilities of CSR: A Brief Review of Contemporary Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 419-438, March.
    8. Woo Jae Lee & Seung Uk Choi, 2018. "Effects of Corporate Life Cycle on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Khadija Bouraoui & Sonia Bensemmane & Marc Ohana & Marcello Russo, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and employees’ affective commitment: A multiple mediation model," Post-Print hal-02390164, HAL.
    10. Ong, Madeline & Mayer, David M. & Tost, Leigh P. & Wellman, Ned, 2018. "When corporate social responsibility motivates employee citizenship behavior: The sensitizing role of task significance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 44-59.
    11. Janthorn Sinthupundaja & N. Chiadamrong & Y. Kohda, 2019. "Internal capabilities, external cooperation and proactive CSR on financial performance," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(15-16), pages 1099-1122, December.
    12. Won-Moo Hur & Tae-Won Moon & Sung-Hoon Ko, 2018. "How Employees’ Perceptions of CSR Increase Employee Creativity: Mediating Mechanisms of Compassion at Work and Intrinsic Motivation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 629-644, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongqing He & Yameng Zhang & Yaqi Ding, 2022. "When Does CSR Fail to Incentive Employees’ Affective Organizational Commitment? Exploring the Moderating Effects Based on the C-S-R Concerns Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Antony King Fung Wong & Seongseop (Sam) Kim, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Internal Consequences: The Moderating Role of Employees’ Position Levels," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    3. So Ra Park & Sung Tae Kim & Hong-Hee Lee, 2022. "Green Supply Chain Management Efforts of First-Tier Suppliers on Economic and Business Performances in the Electronics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Carla Freire & Joana Gonçalves & Maria Rita Carvalho, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility: The Impact of Employees’ Perceptions on Organizational Citizenship Behavior through Organizational Identification," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boban Melovic & Nikola Milovic & Tamara Backovic-Vulic & Branislav Dudic & Peter Bajzik, 2019. "Attitudes and Perceptions of Employees toward Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Balkan Countries: Importance and Relevance for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-37, November.
    2. Erhan Boğan & Bekir Bora Dedeoğlu, 2020. "Hotel employees' corporate social responsibility perception and organizational citizenship behavior: Perceived external prestige and pride in organization as serial mediators," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2342-2353, September.
    3. Bilal Afsar & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and pro‐environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 109-125, January.
    4. Edina Molnár & Asif Mahmood & Naveed Ahmad & Amir Ikram & Shah Ali Murtaza, 2021. "The Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Ethical Leadership, Quality of Work Life and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Healthcare Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Tehreem Fatima & Kamal Badar & Muhammad Waqas & Arslan Ayub & Muhammad Haris, 2023. "CSR Communication Matters! An Examination of CSR, Organisational Pride, and Task-Related Pro-Environmental Behaviour Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Wu, Xiaojuan & Dluhošová, Dana & Zmeškal, Zdeněk, 2023. "The moderating role of a corporate life cycle with the impact of economic value-added on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China's listed companies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    7. Nam Chul Jung & Hyun Ah Kim, 2019. "The Effect of Listing Period on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Hyun Ah Kim & Nam Chul Jung, 2020. "The Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Audit Hours: Moderating Role of the Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs in Audit Report," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Ying Xu & Diao Jie & Hongyu Wu & Xiaolu Shi & Daniel Badulescu & Sher Akbar & Alina Badulescu, 2022. "Reducing Employee Turnover Intentions in Tourism and Hospitality Sector: The Mediating Effect of Quality of Work Life and Intrinsic Motivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. María Garrido‐Ruso & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "The moderating effect of contextual factors and employees' demographic features on the relationship between CSR and work‐related attitudes: A meta‐analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1839-1854, September.
    11. Kyungtag Lee & Hyunchul Lee, 2019. "How Does CSR Activity Affect Sustainable Growth and Value of Corporations? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.
    12. Sergio Pérez & Samuel Fernández-Salinero & Gabriela Topa, 2018. "Sustainability in Organizations: Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Spanish Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Khadija Bouraoui & Sonia Bensemmane & Marc Ohana, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees’ Affective Commitment: A Moderated Mediation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Muddassar Sarfraz & Wang Qun & Li Hui & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah, 2018. "Environmental Risk Management Strategies and the Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Project Financing Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    16. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    17. Tatiana Dănescu & Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean & Maria-Alexandra Popa & Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    18. Giovanni Lombardo & Andrea Mazzocchetti & Irene Rapallo & Nader Tayser & Silvano Cincotti, 2019. "Assessment of the Economic and Social Impact Using SROI: An Application to Sport Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Zahid Yousaf & Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility commitment and participation predict environmental and social performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2578-2587, November.
    20. Kim, Yeonshin & Hur, Won-Moo & Lee, Luri, 2023. "Understanding customer participation in CSR activities: The impact of perceptions of CSR, affective commitment, brand equity, and corporate reputation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12625-:d:679751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.