IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12003-d668382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pro-Environmental Behaviours at Work: The Interactive Role of Norms and Attitudinal Ambivalence

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Mouro

    (Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Iscte Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Vera Lomba

    (Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Iscte Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ana Patrícia Duarte

    (Business Research Unit, Iscte Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

The environmental costs arising from unsustainable production patterns have increased to the point that organisations are now expected to adopt more responsible practices. Pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) in the workplace can significantly contribute to bettering companies’ environmental performance and sustainability transition. This research investigated the interactive role of norms and attitudes in predicting voluntary energy conservation behaviours, based on a correlational study of 189 Portuguese workers. The study examined whether perceived norm conflicts involving co-workers, closer colleagues and leaders’ behaviours promote or hinder workers’ own PEBs and whether attitudinal ambivalence towards their organisation’s pro-environmental initiatives is a moderator of this relationship. Controlling for the effect of the pro-environmental organisational climate, the ages of employees and organisation size, the results confirm that felt ambivalence moderates the relationship between norm conflict and reported energy conservation behaviours. The findings indicate that ambivalent workers are less likely to engage in PEBs if they perceive norm conflict, that is, if other staff members are not equally motivated to adopt those behaviours. Conversely, norm conflict had an energising effect on non-ambivalent workers. The results thus indicate that organisations could benefit from promoting their environmental policies more explicitly, encouraging their employees to discuss these initiatives and making voluntary PEBs more visible in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Mouro & Vera Lomba & Ana Patrícia Duarte, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behaviours at Work: The Interactive Role of Norms and Attitudinal Ambivalence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12003-:d:668382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12003/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12003/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richa Chaudhary, 2020. "Green Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behavior: An Empirical Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 630-641, March.
    2. Lim, Jia Hui & Tai, Kenneth & Kouchaki, Maryam, 2021. "Ambivalent bosses: An examination of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on subordinate task engagement," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 139-152.
    3. Olivier Boiral & David Talbot & Pascal Paillé, 2015. "Leading by Example: A Model of Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 532-550, September.
    4. Carol Hicklenton & Donald W Hine & Natasha M Loi, 2019. "Can work climate foster pro-environmental behavior inside and outside of the workplace?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Zhang, Yixiang & Wang, Zhaohua & Zhou, Guanghui, 2013. "Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: An empirical study based on norm activation model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1120-1127.
    6. Duygu Turker, 2009. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 189-204, October.
    7. Jie He & Alastair M. Morrison & Hao Zhang, 2021. "Being sustainable: The three‐way interactive effects of CSR, green human resource management, and responsible leadership on employee green behavior and task performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1043-1054, May.
    8. Blake E. Ashforth & Kristie M. Rogers & Michael G. Pratt & Camille Pradies, 2014. "Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1453-1478, October.
    9. Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Fan Luo & Amer Saeed & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "How Does Leader’s Support for Environment Promote Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for Environment? A Multi-Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Wouter Poortinga & Nick F. Pidgeon, 2006. "Exploring the Structure of Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Food," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1707-1719, December.
    11. Noah J. Goldstein & Robert B. Cialdini & Vladas Griskevicius, 2008. "A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 472-482, March.
    12. Qing Tian & Jennifer L. Robertson, 2019. "How and When Does Perceived CSR Affect Employees’ Engagement in Voluntary Pro-environmental Behavior?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 399-412, March.
    13. Duygu Turker, 2009. "Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 411-427, April.
    14. Norton, Thomas A. & Zacher, Hannes & Ashkanasy, Neal M., 2012. "On the Importance of Pro-Environmental Organizational Climate for Employee Green Behavior," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 497-500, December.
    15. Valeria Ciampa & Moritz Sirowatka & Sebastian C. Schuh & Franco Fraccaroli & Rolf Dick, 2021. "Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 119-134, February.
    16. Frederik Dahlmann & Layla Branicki & Stephen Brammer, 2019. "Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Taciano L. Milfont, 2009. "The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 263-269, September.
    18. Ana Patrícia Duarte & José Gonçalves Das Neves & Daniel Roque Gomes & Gabriel Alberto Moisés, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and customer orientation in Angola," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1/2), pages 93-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Patrícia Duarte & Carla Mouro, 2022. "Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and Workplace Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Identification’s Sequential Mediation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Mahiuddin Sabbir & Khan Md Raziuddin Taufique, 2022. "Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non‐cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 110-128, January.
    2. Ana Patrícia Duarte & Carla Mouro, 2022. "Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and Workplace Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Identification’s Sequential Mediation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Matthias Gotsch & Carsten Gandenberger & Luisa Serafimov & Mathias Miemiec, 2023. "Top‐down and bottom‐up strategies for the implementation of corporate social responsibility: A qualitative survey of an international IT services company," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1645-1663, July.
    4. Li Xu & Suleiman Jamal Mohammad & Nishad Nawaz & Sarminah Samad & Naveed Ahmad & Ubaldo Comite, 2022. "The Role of CSR for De-Carbonization of Hospitality Sector through Employees: A Leadership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Jing Shao & Asif Mahmood & Heesup Han, 2021. "Unleashing the Potential Role of CSR and Altruistic Values to Foster Pro-Environmental Behavior by Hotel Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Shetu Ranjan Biswas & Mouri Dey & Swadip Bhattacharjee & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2021. "How Does Corporate Environmental Strategy Contribute to Voluntary Environmental Behavior? Influence of Psychological Green Climate, Firms’ Size, and Employees’ Age," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    7. Slobodan Marić & Nemanja Berber & Agneš Slavić & Marko Aleksić, 2021. "The Mediating Role of Employee Commitment in the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in Serbia," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    8. Mario Morales-Parragué & Luis Araya-Castillo & Fidel Molina-Luque & Hugo Moraga-Flores, 2022. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Han, Heesup & Hyun, Sunghyup Sean, 2018. "What influences water conservation and towel reuse practices of hotel guests?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 87-97.
    10. José F. Molina-Azorin & Maria D. López-Gamero & Juan José Tarí & Jorge Pereira-Moliner & Eva M. Pertusa-Ortega, 2021. "Environmental Management, Human Resource Management and Green Human Resource Management: A Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Shilong Wei & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & József Popp, 2021. "An Examination to Explain the Mechanism of Employees’ Environment-Specific Behavior through CSR and Work Engagement from the Perspective of Stewardship Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Debjani Ghosh & L. Gurunathan, 2014. "Linking Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Intention to Quit: The Mediating Role of Job Embeddedness," Vision, , vol. 18(3), pages 175-183, September.
    13. Salih Börteçine Avci & Adnan Karataş, 2022. "Public Service Motivation’s Mediating Role in the Effect Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Justice Have on Organizational Commitment in Higher Education Institutions," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 66(66), pages 29-54, December.
    14. Charles H. Schwepker & Sean R. Valentine & Robert A. Giacalone & Mark Promislo, 2021. "Good Barrels Yield Healthy Apples: Organizational Ethics as a Mechanism for Mitigating Work-Related Stress and Promoting Employee Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 143-159, November.
    15. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang & Philip Hallinger, 2021. "How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Sadia Akhtar & Kashif Ullah Khan & Fouzia Atlas & Muhammad Irfan, 2022. "Stimulating student’s pro-environmental behavior in higher education institutions: an ability–motivation–opportunity perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4128-4149, March.
    17. Qiansong Zhang & Taiwen Feng & Long Cheng & Qingsong He, 2022. "Institutional force and firm performance: Do employee green involvement and flexibility‐oriented culture matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 950-964, July.
    18. Stankevičiūtė Živilė & Wereda Wioletta, 2020. "Universalism values and organisational citizenship behaviour referring to employee perception of corporate social responsibility," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 302-325, June.
    19. Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & M. Sadiq Sohail & Ibrahim Ali M. Jumaan, 2021. "CSR Perceptions and Career Satisfaction: The Role of Psychological Capital and Moral Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Min-Jik Kim & Byung-Jik Kim, 2021. "The Performance Implication of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Role of Employee’s Prosocial Motivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12003-:d:668382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.