IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i15p8154-d598574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Study on Dynamic Evolution of Industrial Structure and Green Economic Growth—Based on Data from China’s Underdeveloped Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Gefu Liang

    (School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Dajia Yu

    (School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Lifei Ke

    (Department of Airport Economics, Beijing Institute of Economic and Management, Beijing 100102, China)

Abstract

From the experiences of developed countries or areas, advanced industrial structure is an effective way to promote economic transformation and high-quality growth. This paper uses the economic development data of seven underdeveloped provinces in China in 10 years to study the relationship between industrial structure upgrading, industrial structure rationalization and green economic growth. The result shows: (1) The relationship between the upgrading of industrial structure and green total factor productivity (GTFP) is a non-linear relationship that is difficult to fit. (2) There are two turning points in the relationship curve between industrial structure upgrading and green total factor productivity (these can be called “rationalization points”). (3) The “rationalization points” are affected by the rationalization of the industrial structure. (4) The “rationalization point” divides the relationship curve into three intervals. Within the threshold range [0.661, 0.673] of the rationalization of the industrial structure, the upgrading of the industrial structure promotes the increase of green total factor productivity, while outside the range, the upgrading of the industrial structure inhibits the increase of green total factor productivity. Therefore, industrial development in underdeveloped areas should first implement rationalization of industrial structure. After the rational adjustment of the industrial structure, we will then develop a high-level industrial structure to improve the green TFP.

Suggested Citation

  • Gefu Liang & Dajia Yu & Lifei Ke, 2021. "An Empirical Study on Dynamic Evolution of Industrial Structure and Green Economic Growth—Based on Data from China’s Underdeveloped Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8154-:d:598574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fagerberg, Jan, 2000. "Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: a comparative study," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 393-411, December.
    2. Markus Grillitsch & Teis Hansen, 2019. "Green industry development in different types of regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 2163-2183, November.
    3. Wolfgang Dauth & Jens Suedekum, 2016. "Globalization and local profiles of economic growth and industrial change," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(5), pages 1007-1034.
    4. Joshua Drucker, 2011. "Regional Industrial Structure Concentration in the United States: Trends and Implications," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(4), pages 421-452, October.
    5. Ian Bailey & Federico Caprotti, 2014. "The Green Economy: Functional Domains and Theoretical Directions of Enquiry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(8), pages 1797-1813, August.
    6. Pauline Deutz & David Gibbs, 2004. "Eco‐industrial development and economic development: industrial ecology or place promotion?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 347-362, September.
    7. Rainer Walz, 2010. "Competences for green development and leapfrogging in newly industrializing countries," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 245-265, August.
    8. Weixian Wei & Manru Zhang, 2020. "The non-linear impact of industrial structure on CO2 emissions in China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 576-579, April.
    9. Joel Mokyr & John V. C. Nye, 2007. "Distribution Coalitions, the Industrial Revolution, and the Origins of Economics Growth in Britain," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 74(1), pages 50-70, July.
    10. Jai S. Mah, 2007. "Industrial Policy and Economic Development: Korea’s Experience," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 77-92, March.
    11. Zhao, Jingfeng & Tang, Jianmin, 2018. "Industrial structure change and economic growth: A China-Russia comparison," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 219-233.
    12. Xiongfeng Pan & Mengna Li & Chenxi Pu & Haitao Xu, 2021. "Study on the industrial structure optimization under constraint of energy intensity," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(1), pages 134-151, February.
    13. Alena V. Fomina & Oksana N. Berduygina & Alexander A. Shatsky, 2018. "Industrial cooperation and its influence on sustainable economic growth," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 467-479, March.
    14. Justin Yifu Lin, 2011. "New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 26(2), pages 193-221, August.
    15. Zhao, Jinkai & Zhou, Na, 2021. "Impact of human health on economic growth under the constraint of environment pollution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Joshua Drucker, 2011. "Regional Industrial Structure Concentration in the United States: Trends and Implications," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 87(4), pages 421-452, October.
    17. Joel Mokyr & John V. C. Nye, 2007. "Distribution Coalitions, the Industrial Revolution, and the Origins of Economics Growth in Britain," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(1), pages 50-70, July.
    18. Lee, Sanghoon & Oh, Dae-Won, 2015. "Economic growth and the environment in China: Empirical evidence using prefecture level data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 73-85.
    19. Timmer, Marcel P. & Szirmai, Adam, 2000. "Productivity growth in Asian manufacturing: the structural bonus hypothesis examined," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 371-392, December.
    20. Singh, Lakhwinder, 2004. "Technological Progress, Structural Change and Productivity Growth in Manufacturing Sector of South Korea," MPRA Paper 99, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Guerrieri, Paolo & Meliciani, Valentina, 2005. "Technology and international competitiveness: The interdependence between manufacturing and producer services," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 489-502, December.
    22. Dong‐Shang Chang & Li‐Ting Yeh & Yong‐fu Chen, 2014. "The Effects of Economic Development, International Trade, Industrial Structure and Energy Demands on Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 377-390, November.
    23. Soytas, Ugur & Sari, Ramazan, 2009. "Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1667-1675, April.
    24. Alena V. Fomina & Oksana N. Berduygina & Alexander A. Shatsky, 2018. "Industrial cooperation and its influence on sustainable economic growth," Post-Print hal-01773578, HAL.
    25. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Wang, H., 2012. "Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 625-635.
    26. Elisabeth Conrad & Louis F. Cassar, 2014. "Decoupling Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: Reviewing Progress to Date in the Small Island State of Malta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad, Tufail & Ni, Guohua & Chen, Zhenling & Mallek, Sabrine & Dudek, Marek & Mentel, Grzegorz, 2024. "Addressing resource curse: How mineral resources influence industrial structure dynamics of the BRI 57 oil-exporting countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Wang, Bo & Wang, Jianda, 2025. "China’s green digital era: How does digital economy enable green economic growth?," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(1).
    3. Xiaoxue Liu & Fuzhen Cao & Shuangshuang Fan, 2022. "Does Human Capital Matter for China’s Green Growth?—Examination Based on Econometric Model and Machine Learning Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Yang Liu & Yanlin Yang & Huihui Li & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China’s Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Maria Gouveia & Carla Henriques & Ana Amaro, 2022. "Is the Cohesion Policy Efficient in Supporting the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy? Some Insights with Value-Based Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Tian, Ying & Pang, Jun, 2023. "What causes dynamic change of green technology progress: Convergence analysis based on industrial restructuring and environmental regulation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-199.
    7. Yutao Lei & Xuan Zhang & Wenxiang Peng, 2022. "Can China’s Policy of Carbon Emissions Trading Optimize Manufacturing Structure? Evidence from Guangdong Based on a Synthetic Control Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Dan Pan & Yi Yu & Kaiwen Ji, 2024. "The impact of rural living environment improvement programs on the subjective well-being of rural residents in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Jianhua Liu & Yingying Zhang & Lingyu Pu & Liangchao Huang & Huiyang Wang & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2023. "Research on the Impact of Energy Efficiency on Green Development: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Yan Shao & Qasim Raza Syed & Raja Fawad Zafar, 2025. "The Dynamic Relationship Between Education and Green Growth in BRICS Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1109-1128, March.
    11. Shihai Liu & Jinsong Kuang & Dezhi Ding & Dag Øivind Madsen & Xiaofei Shi & Xianyang Fan, 2024. "Low-carbon governance, fiscal decentralization, and enterprise green development: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Huwei Wen & Yupeng Liu & Yutong Liu, 2024. "Impact of Digitalization on Investment and Productivity of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Liu & Yanlin Yang & Huihui Li & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China’s Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Lei Nie & Yuanyuan Wang & Yanrui Wu, 2024. "Service Sector Agglomeration and Industrial Structure Optimization: Evidence from China’s Resource-Based Cities," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 24-04, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    3. Yeon, Jung-In & Pyka, Andreas & Kim, Tai-Yoo, 2016. "Structural shift and increasing variety in Korea, 1960-2010: Empirical evidence of the economic development model by the creation of new sectors," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 13-2016, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    4. Celeste Amorim Varum & Bruno Cibrão, 2008. "On R&D, medium and high-tech industries and productivity: an application to the Portuguese case," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 51, Departamento de Economia, Gestão e Engenharia Industrial, Universidade de Aveiro.
    5. Wang, Hai-Jie & Zheng, Mei-Qi & Yin, Hua-Tang & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2024. "Green innovation, industrial structure and urban eco-efficiency in Chinese cities," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1011-1024.
    6. Aradhna Aggarwal & Nagesh Kumar, 2012. "Structural Change, Industrialization and Poverty Reduction: The Case of India," Development Papers 1206, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) South and South-West Asia Office.
    7. Panagiotis Fotis & Michael Polemis, 2018. "Sustainable development, environmental policy and renewable energy use: A dynamic panel data approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 726-740, November.
    8. Ester G. Silva & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2011. "Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of "relatively less developed" countries, 1979--2003," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 20(2), pages 457-510, April.
    9. Michael Peneder & Karl Aiginger & Gernot Hutschenreiter & Markus Marterbauer, 2001. "Structural Change and Economic Growth," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 20668.
    10. Popescu, Gheorghe H. & Mieila, Mihai & Nica, Elvira & Andrei, Jean Vasile, 2018. "The emergence of the effects and determinants of the energy paradigm changes on European Union economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 768-774.
    11. Cardinale, Roberto, 2019. "Theory and practice of State intervention: Italy, South Korea and stages of economic development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 206-216.
    12. Harald Oberhofer & Christian Glocker & Werner Hölzl & Peter Huber & Serguei Kaniovski & Klaus Nowotny & Michael Pfaffermayr & Monique Ebell & Nikolaos Kontogiannis, 2016. "Single Market Transmission Mechanisms Before, During and After the 2008-09 Crisis. A Quantitative Assessment," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59156.
    13. Adrián Rial & Rafael Fernández, 2023. "Does tertiarisation slow down productivity growth? A Kaldorian–Baumolian analysis across 10 developed economies," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 188-222, February.
    14. Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu & Weng, Jia-Hsi, 2019. "How does energy consumption affect China's urbanization? New evidence from dynamic threshold panel models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 24-38.
    15. Matteo Deleidi & Walter Paternesi Meloni & Antonella Stirati, 2020. "Tertiarization, productivity and aggregate demand: evidence-based policies for European countries," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1429-1465, November.
    16. Weiwei Liu & Jianing Yang, 2018. "The Evolutionary Game Theoretic Analysis for Sustainable Cooperation Relationship of Collaborative Innovation Network in Strategic Emerging Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Matthias Figo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Strukturwandel und regionales Wachstum - wissensintensive Unternehmensdienste als Wachstumsmotor?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 145, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    18. Hanchu Liu & Jie Fan & Kan Zhou, 2018. "An Empirical Study on Spatial–Temporal Dynamics and Influencing Factors of Tea Production in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Kai Xu & Bart Bossink & Qiang Chen, 2019. "Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Innovation in China: A Slack-Based Measure (SBM) Model with Undesirable Outputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Anna VORONTSOVA & Tetiana VASYLIEVA. & Yuriy BILAN & Grzegorz OSTASZ & Tetyana MAYBORODA, 2020. "The Influence Of State Regulation Of Education For Achieving The Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study Of Central And Eastern European Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 6-26, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:15:p:8154-:d:598574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.