IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3706-d353713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Optimized Mode of Waste Governance with Sustainable Urban Development—Case from China’s Urban Waste Classified Collection

Author

Listed:
  • Liangjun Peng

    (Department of Accounting, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou 510850, China)

  • Mengdi Gu

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Zhijun Peng

    (School of Finance and Public Management, Tongling University, Tongling 244061, China)

Abstract

With the rapid growth of developing countries, their urban waste is increasing at the same pace, which, in turn, is worsening the environmental pollution and leading to an urgent demand for waste governance. Different waste governance modes will produce different social welfare levels. According to the principles of economics of maximizing the benefit of limited resources, the mathematical models of the three waste governance modes of government, market, and mixed government–market are constructed separately in this paper, and then comparisons are made as to which mode is optimal. The results show that, from the perspective of consumer surplus and producer surplus, the mode by government is optimal, while the mode by market is optimal from the perspective of total social surplus. Since the government acts as the provider of waste governance in China, its allocation of waste governance mode is not optimal from the perspective of total social surplus, as a result of which it fails to restrain the environmental pollution caused by garbage growth most effectively. Nevertheless, since the equilibrium point of waste governance quantity is dynamic, there is still much room for the optimization of waste governance in China, which will certainly inject new impetus to the high quality and sustainable development of its cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangjun Peng & Mengdi Gu & Zhijun Peng, 2020. "Study on the Optimized Mode of Waste Governance with Sustainable Urban Development—Case from China’s Urban Waste Classified Collection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3706-:d:353713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3706/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3706/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihaela Constantinescu & Andreea Orîndaru & Ștefan-Claudiu Căescu & Andreea Pachițanu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Green Areas for Quality of Life Improvement—Argument for Increased Citizen Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Millimet, Daniel L., 2013. "Environmental Federalism: A Survey of the Empirical Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 7831, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Olle Hage & Krister Sandberg & Patrik Söderholm & Christer Berglund, 2018. "The regional heterogeneity of household recycling: a spatial-econometric analysis of Swedish plastic packing waste," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 245-267, October.
    4. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Electricity generation from municipal solid waste in some selected cities of Nigeria: An assessment of feasibility, potential and technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 149-162.
    5. Zhou, Chuanbin & Huang, Heping & Cao, Aixin & Xu, Wanying, 2015. "Modeling the carbon cycle of the municipal solid waste management system for urban metabolism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 150-156.
    6. E. Sanneh & Allen Hu & Y. Chang & Edrisa Sanyang, 2011. "Introduction of a recycling system for sustainable municipal solid waste management: a case study on the greater Banjul area of the Gambia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(6), pages 1065-1080, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franco, David Gabriel de Barros & Steiner, Maria Teresinha Arns & Fernandes, Rafaela Pereira & Nascimento, Victor Fernandez, 2022. "Modeling municipal solid waste disposal consortia on a regional scale for present and future scenarios," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    2. Ning Cui & Jiaxuan Li & Jun Tu & Maochun Zhou, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Participating in Garbage Management under the Background of Internet of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Xiaoyu Yang & Xiaopeng Guo & Kun Yang, 2021. "Redesigning the Municipal Solid Waste Supply Chain Considering the Classified Collection and Disposal: A Case Study of Incinerable Waste in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cudjoe, Dan & Wang, Hong & zhu, Bangzhu, 2022. "Thermochemical treatment of daily COVID-19 single-use facemask waste: Power generation potential and environmental impact analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Romano, Giulia & Molinos-Senante, María & Carosi, Laura & Llanquileo-Melgarejo, Paula & Sala-Garrido, Ramón & Mocholi-Arce, Manuel, 2021. "Assessing the dynamic eco-efficiency of Italian municipalities by accounting for the ownership of the entrusted waste utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Yuxin Fang & Hongjun Cao & Jihui Sun, 2022. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Regional Green Development under China’s Environmental Decentralization System—Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Threshold Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Mengxue Ji & Zhenming Wu & Dandan Zhu, 2023. "Environmental Vertical Management and Enterprises’ Performance: Evidence from Water Pollution Reduction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Maria Stella Righettini, 2021. "Framing Sustainability. Evidence from Participatory Forums to Taylor the Regional 2030 Agenda to Local Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Oluwaseun Nubi & Stephen Morse & Richard J. Murphy, 2022. "Prospective Life Cycle Costing of Electricity Generation from Municipal Solid Waste in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Alao, M.A., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of waste-to-energy (WtE) technologies for electricity generation using municipal solid waste in Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 200-218.
    8. Jonathan Colmer & Mary F. Evans & Jay Shimshack, 2023. "Environmental citizen complaints," CEP Discussion Papers dp1903, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    9. Mats Wilhelmsson, 2022. "About the Importance of Planning the Location of Recycling Stations in the Urban Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Fredriksson, Per G. & Wollscheid, Jim R., 2014. "Environmental decentralization and political centralization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 402-410.
    11. Fang, Wei & An, Haizhong & Li, Huajiao & Gao, Xiangyun & Sun, Xiaoqi & Zhong, Weiqiong, 2017. "Accessing on the sustainability of urban ecological-economic systems by means of a coupled emergy and system dynamics model: A case study of Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 326-337.
    12. Cudjoe, Dan & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Obuobi, Bright & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Adjei, Mavis & Zhu, Bangzhu, 2021. "Forecasting the potential and economic feasibility of power generation using biogas from food waste in Ghana: Evidence from Accra and Kumasi," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Jinhui Liu & Qing Li & Wei Gu & Chen Wang, 2019. "The Impact of Consumption Patterns on the Generation of Municipal Solid Waste in China: Evidences from Provincial Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Agaton, Casper Boongaling & Guno, Charmaine Samala & Villanueva, Resy Ordona & Villanueva, Riza Ordona, 2020. "Economic analysis of waste-to-energy investment in the Philippines: A real options approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    15. Shaolong Zeng & Lingyun Gao & Rui Shen & Yingying Ma & Haiping Li, 2020. "Fiscal Decentralization, Pollution and China’s Tourism Revenue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-11, March.
    16. Kristyna Rybova, 2019. "Do Sociodemographic Characteristics in Waste Management Matter? Case Study of Recyclable Generation in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Zare, A. Darabadi & Saray, R. Khoshbakhti & Mirmasoumi, S. & Bahlouli, K., 2019. "Optimization strategies for mixing ratio of biogas and natural gas co-firing in a cogeneration of heat and power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 635-644.
    18. Zhigao Luo & Xinyun Hu & Mingming Li & Jirui Yang & Chuanhao Wen, 2019. "Centralization or Decentralization of Environmental Governance—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Blundell, Wesley & Evans, Mary F. & Stafford, Sarah L., 2021. "Regulating hazardous wastes under U.S. environmental federalism: The role of state resources," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Prakash Chandra Jha, 2015. "Theory of fiscal federalism: an analysis," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 17(2), pages 241-259, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3706-:d:353713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.