IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3143-d345217.html

Gender Inequalities and Social Sustainability. Can Modernization Diminish the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge?

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Roig

    (GIPEyOP, University of Valencia, Av. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
    Department of Constitutional Law, Political and Administrative Sciences, University of Valencia, Av. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Cristina Aybar

    (GIPEyOP, University of Valencia, Av. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
    Department of Applied Economics, University of Valencia, Av. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Jose M. Pavía

    (GIPEyOP, University of Valencia, Av. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
    Department of Applied Economics, University of Valencia, Av. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
    UMICCS, Universitat de València, Av. Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The gender gap in political knowledge is a classical problem of Western democracies. In the 21st century, political knowledge is still unequally distributed between men and women, as many cross-section studies have shown. This is an indicator of women’s disempowerment and the distance which remains to be covered to achieve an inclusive and sustainable society. Could public policies and gender equality laws change the situation? Using a longitudinal database in which 600,000 survey responses are analysed from 1996 to 2017, this case study of Spain aims to shed some light on this question. It combines sociological and political approaches in line with the development theory of the gender gap of Inglehart and Norris (2000, 2003), whose core argument is that modernization changes cultural attitudes toward gender equality. From this perspective, this paper proposes the following hypothesis: the modernization process of Spain (from a dictatorship to a democracy) has given rise to changes in traditional sex roles, driving women‘s access to political knowledge and diminishing the gender gap. This is a step towards achieving objective number 5 of the 2030 United Nations Agenda for Sustainable Development (gender equality and empowerment of women and girls), according to which gender equality is not only a fundamental human right but a necessary foundation for a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Roig & Cristina Aybar & Jose M. Pavía, 2020. "Gender Inequalities and Social Sustainability. Can Modernization Diminish the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3143-:d:345217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:apsrev:v:53:y:1959:i:01:p:69-105_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Fraile, Marta & Gomez, Raul, 2017. "Why Does Alejandro Know More about Politics than Catalina? Explaining the Latin American Gender Gap in Political Knowledge," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 91-112, January.
    3. Carol Galais & André Blais, 2019. "Is There a Gender Gap in the Sense of Duty to Vote?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Brady, Henry E. & Verba, Sidney & Schlozman, Kay Lehman, 1995. "Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(2), pages 271-294, June.
    5. Bettina Lynda Bastian & Beverly Dawn Metcalfe & Mohammad Reza Zali, 2019. "Gender Inequality: Entrepreneurship Development in the MENA Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Elizabeth Frazer & Kenneth Macdonald, 2003. "Sex Differences in Political Knowledge in Britain," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(1), pages 67-83, March.
    7. Joonmo Cho & Jaeseong Lee, 2015. "Persistence of the Gender Gap and Low Employment of Female Workers in a Stratified Labor Market: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chrysanthi Charatsari & Iosif Fragkoulis & Evaggelos Anagnou & Evagelos D. Lioutas, 2022. "Can Adult Education Boost Sustainability Transitions? Some Evidence from Farmers and Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Rosa Roig & Cristina Aybar & José M. Pavía, 2024. "Toward a Modern Gender Gap in Left-Right Self-Placement: A Study Case of the Population Aged Over 64 Years in Spain," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    3. Sultana Razia & Siti Hajar Abu Bakar Ah, 2023. "Model of social sustainability for Dhaka city, Bangladesh," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Seung Hee Yang & Byung Yong Jeong, 2020. "Gender Differences in Wage, Social Support, and Job Satisfaction of Public Sector Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Chenghua Guan & Ling Zuo, 2021. "Sustainability of Regional Factors on the Gendered Division of Housework in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Francisco Manuel Morales Rodríguez & René Rodríguez Clares & María Remedios García Muñoz, 2020. "Influence of Resilience, Everyday Stress, Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem, Emotional Intelligence, and Empathy on Attitudes toward Sexual and Gender Diversity Rights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Fraile & Jessica Fortin‐Rittberger, 2020. "Unpacking Gender, Age, and Education Knowledge Inequalities: A Systematic Comparison," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1653-1669, July.
    2. Jung-In Jo & Hyun Jin Choi, 2019. "Enigmas of grievances about inequality: Effects of attitudes toward inequality and government redistribution on protest participation," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 348-368, December.
    3. Jansesberger, Viktoria, 2024. "Storms, floods, landslides and elections in India's growing metropolises: Hotbeds for political protest?," Working Papers 28, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    4. Denny,Elaine Kathryn & Dow,David & Levy,Gabriella & Villamizar-Chaparro,Mateo, 2022. "Extortion and Civic Engagement among Guatemalan Deportees," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10020, The World Bank.
    5. Bourguignon, Francois, 2005. "The Effect of Economic Growth on Social Structures," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 27, pages 1701-1747, Elsevier.
    6. Ronconi, Lucas & Zarazaga S.J., Rodrigo, 2015. "Labor Exclusion and the Erosion of Citizenship Responsibilities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 453-461.
    7. Francisco Guijarro, 2018. "Economic Recovery and Effectiveness of Active Labour Market Initiatives for the Unemployed in Spain: A Gender Perspective of the Valencian Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. James Tilley & Christopher Wlezien, 2008. "Does Political Information Matter? An Experimental Test Relating to Party Positions on Europe," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 192-214, March.
    9. Angelo Antoci & Fabio Sabatini & Mauro Sodini, 2009. "Will growth and technology destroy social interaction? The inverted U-shape hypothesis," CIMEO Working Paper Series 57, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    10. Toyin Ajibade Adisa & Gbolahan Gbadamosi & Teena Lashmore & Shampa Roy‐Mukherjee, 2025. "Tokenism and the Concrete Ceiling: Navigating Racial and Gender Disparities in the Experiences of Black Female Police Officers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1654-1667, July.
    11. Evelien Tonkens & Imrat Verhoeven, 2019. "The civic support paradox: Fighting unequal participation in deprived neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1595-1610, June.
    12. Poy, Samuele & Schüller, Simone, 2016. "Internet and Voting in the Web 2.0 Era: Evidence from a Local Broadband Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 9991, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. James Rockey, 2009. "Who is left-wing, and who just thinks they are?," Discussion Papers in Economics 09/23, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester, revised Feb 2014.
    14. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    15. Wegenast, Tim, 2010. "Cana, café, cacau: agrarian structure and educational inequalities in Brazil," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 103-137, March.
    16. Mia Maric & Mladen Subotic & Branislav Dudic & Boban Melovic & Natasa Brankovic & Stevan Milisavljevic, 2021. "Evaluating Relations between Originality, Efficiency, Conformism and Entrepreneurial Potential of Students in a Fast Changing Business Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Chia-Hui Chen & Chao-Lung Liu & Bryant Pui Hung Hui & Ming-Lun Chung, 2020. "Does Education Background Affect Digital Equal Opportunity and the Political Participation of Sustainable Digital Citizens? A Taiwan Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Ricardo González & Bernardo Mackenna & Estéfano Rubio, 2017. "La tensión entre individualismo y desigualdad en el Chile actual," Informes de Encuesta CEP, in: ¿Malestar en Chile? Informe Encuesta CEP 2016, edition 1, chapter 2, pages 79-107, Centro de Estudios Públicos.
    19. R. Urbatsch, 2012. "The paradox of voting intelligently," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 511-524, March.
    20. Nwankwo Cletus Famous & Okafor Uchenna Paulinus, 2017. "Voting in Nigeria: Determinants of Turnout in the 2015 Presidential Election," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 249-260, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3143-:d:345217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.