IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p10163-d457392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of Portuguese Courts: Citizen Satisfaction and Loyalty as Key Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira

    (Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia

    (Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Centre for Public Administration and Public Policies, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper aims to describe the satisfaction and loyalty of citizens towards the sustainability of Portuguese courts. This research was carried out under the Portuguese justice agenda named “Justice + Closer” between the years of 2017, 2018, and 2019. The methodological approach adopted was quantitative. Based on the literature review, a structural model of the relationships between the dimensions that directly and indirectly influence citizen satisfaction and loyalty was adapted from the arbitration centers to the court’s reality. Data collection was carried out during the three years mentioned—in person at the Portuguese Campus of Justice and also through questionnaires applied online. In the course of the three years, 3276 observations were collected. Through structural equation modeling, it was possible to measure positive relations produced between seven established dimensions. The results of this study contribute generally to applied research in the field of justice administration and to the understanding of this topic by those in the academic sector where it has been superficially addressed. Related future investigations might include a comparative study between the satisfaction and loyalty of citizens with (i) the formal adjudication processes and case outcomes of the Portuguese courts and (ii) alternative dispute-resolution processes and case outcome means reached by recognized arbitration and mediation centers, judges of peace, and related ADR services.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira & Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia, 2020. "Sustainability of Portuguese Courts: Citizen Satisfaction and Loyalty as Key Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10163-:d:457392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10163/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/10163/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto & Manello, Alessandro & Ramello, Giovanni B., 2015. "Judicial productivity, delay and efficiency: A Directional Distance Function (DDF) approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 592-601.
    2. Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia & Ireneu de Oliveira Mendes & Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira & Inês Subtil, 2020. "The Combat against COVID-19 in Portugal: How State Measures and Data Availability Reinforce Some Organizational Values and Contribute to the Sustainability of the National Health System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia & Ireneu de Oliveira Mendes & Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira & Inês Subtil, 2020. "The Combat against COVID-19 in Portugal, Part II: How Governance Reinforces Some Organizational Values and Contributes to the Sustainability of Crisis Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira & Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia, 2021. "The Sustainability of the Portuguese Prison System: A Criminal Justice System in Masculine Form?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berlemann, Michael & Christmann, Robin, 2017. "The Role of Precedents on Court Delay - Evidence from a civil law country," MPRA Paper 80057, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. César Salazar & Roberto Cárdenas-Retamal & Marcela Jaime, 2023. "Environmental efficiency in the salmon industry—an exploratory analysis around the 2007 ISA virus outbreak and subsequent regulations in Chile," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8107-8135, August.
    3. Pontus Mattsson & Jonas Månsson & Christian Andersson & Fredrik Bonander, 2018. "A bootstrapped Malmquist index applied to Swedish district courts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 109-139, August.
    4. Boccali, Filippo & Mariani, Marcello M. & Visani, Franco & Mora-Cruz, Alexandra, 2022. "Innovative value-based price assessment in data-rich environments: Leveraging online review analytics through Data Envelopment Analysis to empower managers and entrepreneurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Stefan Voigt, 2016. "Determinants of judicial efficiency: a survey," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 183-208, October.
    6. Melcarne Alessandro & Ramello Giovanni B., 2015. "Judicial Independence, Judges’ Incentives and Efficiency," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 149-169, July.
    7. Grajzl, Peter & Silwal, Shikha, 2020. "Multi-court judging and judicial productivity in a career judiciary: Evidence from Nepal," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Silva, Maria Conceição A., 2018. "Output-specific inputs in DEA: An application to courts of justice in Portugal," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 43-53.
    9. Giacalone, Massimiliano & Nissi, Eugenia & Cusatelli, Carlo, 2020. "Dynamic efficiency evaluation of Italian judicial system using DEA based Malmquist productivity indexes," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Bai, Ge & Shen, Zhiyang & Šermukšnytė-Alešiūnienė, Kristina & Štreimikienė, Dalia & Li, Tianxiang, 2024. "Energy structure and green productivity dynamics: Investigation from OECD Countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Arnaud Abad, 2020. "Environmental Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Working Papers hal-03032038, HAL.
    12. Dimitrova-Grajzl, Valentina & Grajzl, Peter & Slavov, Atanas & Zajc, Katarina, 2016. "Courts in a transition economy: Case disposition and the quantity–quality tradeoff in Bulgaria," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 18-38.
    13. Samudra Sen, 2020. "Indian Judiciary Imprisoned: An Integrated AHP–TOPSIS Approach to Judicial Productivity," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(2), pages 586-603, April.
    14. Frederic Ang & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2018. "Decomposing dynamic profit inefficiency of Belgian dairy farms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(1), pages 81-99.
    15. Timothy Yu-Cheong Yeung & Michal Ovádek & Nicolas Lampach, 2022. "Time efficiency as a measure of court performance: evidence from the Court of Justice of the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 209-234, April.
    16. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Bădin, Luiza & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Silva, Maria Conceição, 2025. "An integrative approach to reviewing the literature on judicial efficiency in Europe," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Lopes, Nuno Q.M. & Silva, Maria C.A., 2024. "Scale and scope economies in first-instance courts: Portuguese specialized vs non-specialized courts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. An, Qingxian & Zhu, Kefan & Xiong, Beibei, 2024. "Investment allocation in an adjustment-cost production technology framework for two-stage network structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 319(3), pages 808-819.
    19. Lombardo, Rosaria & Camminatiello, Ida & D'Ambra, Antonello & Beh, Eric J., 2021. "Assessing the Italian tax courts system by weighted three-way log-ratio analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Visani, Franco & Boccali, Filippo, 2020. "Purchasing price assessment of leverage items: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:10163-:d:457392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.