IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7824-d417307.html

Identifying ‘True’ Water Loss Information through the MFCA Model for Improved Cost-Saving Decisions in a Water Utility: A Case Study of the Doorndraai Water Treatment Scheme in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Bamidele Fakoya

    (ACSAM, School of Accountancy, University of Limpopo, Mankweng 0727, South Africa)

  • Emmanuel O. Imuezerua

    (Department of Accounting, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa)

Abstract

We identified the deficiency in the conventional accounting system in capturing water-loss-related information and its effect on cost-saving decisions in a water utility in South Africa. We employed the material flow cost accounting (MFCA) model in the case of the Doorndraai Water Treatment Scheme to highlight inefficient phases of the water purification processes for the manager to identify opportunities for corrective action. Findings reveal that the inability of the conventional accounting system in accurately capturing water loss information limits the scheme manager’s ability to recognize cost-saving opportunities. Consequently, we found that the implementation of the material flow cost accounting (MFCA) model identified the pumping process as a major contributor to the water scheme’s daily operating loss because of the pumping machine’s low capacitor. Besides, this pumping machine has been in operation for about five years, an indication that the water scheme had been operating at a loss daily for a number of years. Thus, we suggested that the water scheme should invest in procuring a more suitable pumping device to reduce the huge electricity cost incurred daily by the Doorndraai Water Treatment Scheme. Besides this, the paper extended the implementation of the MFCA by providing an example of how the managerial accounting system can support environmental and economic sustainability in water purification processes. Thus, we reiterate that one way of effectively managing water resources is to appropriately capture the volume of water loss and water-purification-related costs to improve its efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Bamidele Fakoya & Emmanuel O. Imuezerua, 2020. "Identifying ‘True’ Water Loss Information through the MFCA Model for Improved Cost-Saving Decisions in a Water Utility: A Case Study of the Doorndraai Water Treatment Scheme in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7824-:d:417307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvi, Mohsin, 2016. "A Manual for Selecting Sampling Techniques in Research," MPRA Paper 70218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mehenna Yakhou & Vernon P. Dorweiler, 2004. "Environmental accounting: an essential component of business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 65-77, March.
    3. Berry, A.J. & Coad, A.F. & Harris, E.P. & Otley, D.T. & Stringer, C., 2009. "Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 2-20.
    4. Christ, Katherine L., 2014. "Water management accounting and the wine supply chain: Empirical evidence from Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 379-396.
    5. Wei Qian & Roger Burritt & Gary Monroe, 2011. "Environmental management accounting in local government," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 93-128, January.
    6. Ioannis E. Nikolaou & George Kourouklaris & Thomas A. Tsalis, 2014. "A framework to assist the financial community in incorporating water risks into their investment decisions," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 93-109, April.
    7. repec:iwt:bosers:h040193 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Keryn Chalmers & Jayne M. Godfrey & Barbara Lynch, 2012. "Regulatory theory insights into the past, present and future of general purpose water accounting standard setting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(6), pages 1001-1024, July.
    9. Chenhall, Robert H., 2003. "Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 127-168.
    10. repec:iwt:bosers:h039769 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Segopotje Evonia MALATJI & Collins C. NGWAKWE, 2026. "Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Management Accounting Costing Techniques on Water Consumption in South African Manufacturing Companies," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 7(1), pages 57-67, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christ, Katherine L., 2014. "Water management accounting and the wine supply chain: Empirical evidence from Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 379-396.
    2. Panero Martina & De Bernardi Paola & Marcacci Caterina & Bresciani Stefano, 2026. "Beyond the Surface: A Critical Analysis of Corporate Water Accounting Literature for Sustainable Development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 39-55, January.
    3. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    4. Smith, Steven D. & Thomas, Tyler F., 2024. "The effects of strategic alignment and strategic clarity on multidimensional task performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Andréia Cittadin & Fabricia Silva da Rosa & Januario Monteiro, 2026. "Environmental Sustainability in Wineries: How Contingency Factors and Environmental Management Accounting Tools Influence Environmental Performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 5802-5822, May.
    6. A.D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki‐Hoon Lee & Pubudu K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, 2021. "Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 825-839, February.
    7. Stefea Petru & Bobitan Roxana-Ioana, 2015. "Integrated Reporting - A More Holistic Picture For A Company," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 448-456, December.
    8. Michael Bamidele Fakoya & Emmanuel O. Imuezerua, 2021. "Improving water pricing decisions through material flow cost accounting model: a case study of the Politsi Water Treatment Scheme in South Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2243-2260, February.
    9. Matolcsy, Zoltan & Wakefield, James, 2017. "Multinational headquarter control of wholly owned foreign subsidiaries," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 275-293.
    10. Andrea Fried, 2017. "Terminological distinctions of ‘control’: a review of the implications for management control research in the context of innovation," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-40, February.
    11. Jürgen Harrer & Andreas Wald, 2016. "Levers of enterprise security control: a study on the use, measurement and value contribution," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 7-32, February.
    12. Alexander Tkotz & Jan Christoph Munck & Andreas Erich Wald, 2018. "Innovation Management Control: Bibliometric Analysis Of Its Emergence And Evolution As A Research Field," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-34, April.
    13. Tobias Johansson & Gabriella Wennblom, 2017. "In female supervisors male subordinates trust!? An experiment on supervisor and subordinate gender and the perceptions of tight control," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 321-345, October.
    14. Lueg, Rainer & Radlach, Ronny, 2016. "Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-171.
    15. Sebastian Goebel & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2017. "Effects of management control mechanisms: towards a more comprehensive analysis," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 185-219, February.
    16. Rikhardsson, Pall & Dull, Richard, 2016. "An exploratory study of the adoption, application and impacts of continuous auditing technologies in small businesses," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 26-37.
    17. Walid Ben‐Amar & Mohamed Chelli, 2018. "What drives voluntary corporate water disclosures? The effect of country‐level institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1609-1622, December.
    18. Stefan Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    19. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2016. "Innovation in Public Sector Management Control Systems in the Context of New Public Management: A Case of an Australian Public Sector Organization," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 99-125.
    20. Enrico Bracci & Laura Maran, 2011. "Performance measurement in the public sector: some theoretical and practical reflections," Working Papers 201121, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7824-:d:417307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.