IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6910-d403911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Knowledge Management and Firm Innovativeness: The Contingent Role of Innovative Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Abang Azlan Mohamad

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak 94300, Malaysia)

  • T. Ramayah

    (School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang 11800, Malaysia
    Internet Innovation Research Center, Newhuadu Business School, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
    Faculty of Accounting and Management, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Sungai Long Campus, Cheras 43000, Malaysia)

  • May Chiun Lo

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak 94300, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study presents the moderating effect of innovative culture on the relationship between knowledge management and firm innovativeness. The consequences of organisations that do not practice innovative culture would result in their inability to respond and react effectively to changes in the dynamic nature of the business environment and henceforth unable to achieve superior performance. In attempting to answer the research questions, a total of 202 MSC Malaysia organisations took part in the survey. To assess the developed model, WarpPLS (version 7.0) was applied based on path modelling and then bootstrapping. The results highlighted that three of the four dimensions of knowledge management, namely knowledge acquisition, knowledge application and knowledge protection were positively and significantly related to firm innovativeness. On the other hand, innovative culture was found to moderate the relationships between knowledge acquisition and firm innovativeness; and knowledge application and firm innovativeness.

Suggested Citation

  • Abang Azlan Mohamad & T. Ramayah & May Chiun Lo, 2020. "Sustainable Knowledge Management and Firm Innovativeness: The Contingent Role of Innovative Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6910-:d:403911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing‐Wen Huang & Yong‐Hui Li, 2009. "The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 285-301, June.
    2. Dibrell, Clay & Fairclough, Samantha & Davis, Peter S., 2015. "The impact of external and internal entrainment on firm innovativeness: A test of moderation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 19-26.
    3. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2014. "The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 39-47.
    4. Chung‐Jen Chen & Jing‐Wen Huang & Yung‐Chang Hsiao, 2010. "Knowledge management and innovativeness," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(8), pages 848-870, November.
    5. Salaheddine Bendak & Amir Moued Shikhli & Refaat H. Abdel-Razek, 2020. "How changing organizational culture can enhance innovation: Development of the innovative culture enhancement framework," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1712125-171, January.
    6. Gunday, Gurhan & Ulusoy, Gunduz & Kilic, Kemal & Alpkan, Lutfihak, 2011. "Effects of innovation types on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 662-676, October.
    7. Martín-de Castro, Gregorio & Delgado-Verde, Miriam & Navas-López, José E. & Cruz-González, Jorge, 2013. "The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 351-363.
    8. Mahdi, Omar Rabeea & Nassar, Islam A. & Almsafir, Mahmoud Khalid, 2019. "Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 320-334.
    9. Michael A. Hitt & R. Duane Ireland & S. Michael Camp & Donald L. Sexton, 2001. "Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 479-491, June.
    10. Hogan, Suellen J. & Coote, Leonard V., 2014. "Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1609-1621.
    11. Marianne Gloet & Danny Samson, 2016. "Knowledge Management and Systematic Innovation Capability," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 12(2), pages 54-72, April.
    12. Santoro, Gabriele & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis & Dezi, Luca, 2018. "The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 347-354.
    13. Ali, Murad & Park, Kichan, 2016. "The mediating role of an innovative culture in the relationship between absorptive capacity and technical and non-technical innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1669-1675.
    14. Sajjad Nawaz Khan & Rai Imtiaz Hussain & Shafique -Ur-Rehman & Muhammad Qasim Maqbool & Engku Ismail Engku Ali & Muhammad Numan, 2019. "The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organizational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1631018-163, January.
    15. Muhammad Ali Butt & Faisal Nawaz & Saddam Hussain & Maria José Sousa & Minhong Wang & Muhammad Saleem Sumbal & Muhammad Shujahat, 2019. "Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based sys," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 336-356, September.
    16. Mahabubur Rahman & Saqib Aziz & Mathew Hughes, 2020. "The product‐market performance benefits of environmental policy: Why customer awareness and firm innovativeness matter," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2001-2018, July.
    17. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Caroline Bingxin Li, 2012. "How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9), pages 1090-1102, September.
    18. Craig, Justin B. & Dibrell, Clay & Garrett, Robert, 2014. "Examining relationships among family influence, family culture, flexible planning systems, innovativeness and firm performance," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 229-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saira Begum & Enjun Xia & Khalid Mehmood & Yaser Iftikhar & Yan Li, 2020. "The Impact of CEOs’ Transformational Leadership on Sustainable Organizational Innovation in SMEs: A Three-Wave Mediating Role of Organizational Learning and Psychological Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, 2021. "Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Jeong-min Ryu & Sewon Park & Yoonseo Park & Jeongwon Park & Munjae Lee, 2021. "Innovative Culture and Firm Performance of Medical Device Companies: Mediating Effects of Investment in Education and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Shiaw Tong Ha & May Chiun Lo & Mohamad Kadim Suaidi & Abang Azlan Mohamad & Zaidi Bin Razak, 2021. "Knowledge Management Process, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Performance in SMEs: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Lijie Feng & Zhenzhen Zhao & Jinfeng Wang & Ke Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Knowledge Management Capabilities on Innovation Performance from Dynamic Capabilities Perspective: Moderating the Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Pantelis C. Kostis, 2021. "Culture, innovation, and economic development," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Sergio Ochoa-Jiménez & Beatriz Alicia Leyva-Osuna & Carlos Armando Jacobo-Hernández & Alma Rocío García-García, 2021. "Knowledge Management in Relation to Innovation and Its Effect on the Sustainability of Mexican Tourism Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Valdonė Indrašienė & Violeta Jegelevičienė & Odeta Merfeldaitė & Daiva Penkauskienė & Jolanta Pivorienė & Asta Railienė & Justinas Sadauskas & Natalija Valavičienė, 2021. "Linking Critical Thinking and Knowledge Management: A Conceptual Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aksoy, Hasan, 2017. "How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 133-141.
    2. Scaliza, Janaina Aparecida Alves & Jugend, Daniel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Latan, Hengky & Armellini, Fabiano & Twigg, David & Andrade, Darly Fernando, 2022. "Relationships among organizational culture, open innovation, innovative ecosystems, and performance of firms: Evidence from an emerging economy context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 264-279.
    3. Mazur Jolanta & Zaborek Piotr, 2016. "Organizational Culture and Open Innovation Performance in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 51(1), pages 104-138, September.
    4. Pandey, Jatin & Gupta, Manish & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup & Hassan, Yusuf & Kukreja, Priyam, 2021. "Technology-enabled knowledge management for community healthcare workers: The effects of knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 787-799.
    5. Azeem, Muhammad & Ahmed, Munir & Haider, Sajid & Sajjad, Muhammad, 2021. "Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Ju Han Yeon & Seung-hwan Jang, 2023. "The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Hossain, Md Afnan & Akter, Shahriar & Yanamandram, Venkata, 2021. "Why doesn't our value creation payoff: Unpacking customer analytics-driven value creation capability to sustain competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 287-296.
    8. Louise Lindbjerg & Theodor Vladasel, 2021. "Hiring Entrepreneurs for Innovation," Working Papers 1309, Barcelona School of Economics.
    9. Domingo García Pérez-De-Lema & Peter Bent Hansen & Antonia Madrid-Gujjarro & Jane Lucia Silva-Santos, 2019. "INFLUENCE OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN THE DYNAMICS OF INNOVATION AND IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Suming Wu & Hui Gao, 2022. "How Internal IT Capability Affects Open Innovation Performance: From Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    11. Lyu, Chongchong & Yang, Jianjun & Zhang, Feng & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Mu, Tian, 2020. "How do knowledge characteristics affect firm’s knowledge sharing intention in interfirm cooperation? An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-60.
    12. Nguyen, Huu Le & Larimo, Jorma & Wang, Yi, 2019. "Control, innovation and international joint venture performance: The moderating role of internal and external environments," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    13. Kurtmollaiev, Seidali & Lervik-Olsen, Line & Andreassen, Tor W., 2022. "Competing through innovation: Let the customer judge!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 87-101.
    14. Zheng, Lu & Ulrich, Klaus & Sendra-García, Javier, 2021. "Qualitative comparative analysis: Configurational paths to innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 83-93.
    15. Vítor Costa & Samuel Monteiro, 2018. "From Potential Absorptive Capacity to Knowledge Creation in Organisations: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Storage and Realised Absorptive Capacity," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Caroline Mothe & Uyen T. Nguyen-Thi & Phu Nguyen-Van, 2015. "Complementarities in organizational innovation practices: evidence from French industrial firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 569-595, September.
    17. Javanmardi Kashan, Alireza & Wiewiora, Anna & Mohannak, Kavoos, 2021. "Unpacking organisational culture for innovation in Australian mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Lima Nasrin Eni, 2022. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing in the Nexus among Human Capital, IT Capability, Transactional Leadership and Innovation Performance: Empirical Evidence from Bangladeshi Telecommunication Sector," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17.
    19. Manuel Guisado-González & Len Tiu Wright & Manuel Guisado-Tato, 2017. "Product–process matrix and complementarity approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 441-459, June.
    20. Yanhui Jiang & Chongyang Wei & Zhi Yang & Ulaganathan Subramanian, 2018. "Does Stronger R&D Capability Always Promote Better Innovation? The Moderating Role Of Knowledge Boundary Spanning Of R&D Network," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6910-:d:403911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.