IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9711-d882249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Cerezo-Narváez

    (School of Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain)

  • Andrés Pastor-Fernández

    (School of Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain)

  • Manuel Otero-Mateo

    (School of Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain)

  • Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez

    (Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability Research Centre (PRINS), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Organizations undertaking construction projects often deal with uncertainty and complexity. Risks include a wide range of occurrences that can lead to project failure. However, these difficulties may be minimized if risks are properly managed. In addition, knowledge management may emerge as a key element in facing unforeseen events and detecting the actions that are working well in other projects. In this context, this study intends to demonstrate the influence of managing organizational knowledge on risk management and the impact of both on the success of projects and associated businesses. To this end, a questionnaire was distributed among construction technicians, practitioners and managers in order to assess the importance of factors managing knowledge and risk and of success criteria. Thanks to the participation of almost four hundred respondents, cause-and-effect relationships are characterized by means of structural equation modeling, statistically confirming them. The specific links between the knowledge-management projects and the skills and abilities to face risks provided by the International Project Management Association (IPMA) standards, with a relation of 0.892 out of 1, justify the 75.1% of the success of the venture. These findings prove that the application of IPMA proposals enhances the required knowledge that leads to improved completion and delivery of complex construction projects in risky environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9711-:d:882249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9711/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9711/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Ngacho & Debadyuti Das, 2015. "A performance evaluation framework of construction projects: insights from literature," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 151-173.
    2. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, 2021. "Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Kwabena Asomanin Anaman & Charity Osei-Amponsah, 2007. "Analysis of the causality links between the growth of the construction industry and the growth of the macro-economy in Ghana," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 951-961.
    4. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda C. Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    5. Robert M. Grant, 1996. "Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 375-387, August.
    6. Ferreira de Araújo Lima, Priscila & Crema, Maria & Verbano, Chiara, 2020. "Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 78-94.
    7. Abang Azlan Mohamad & T. Ramayah & May Chiun Lo, 2020. "Sustainable Knowledge Management and Firm Innovativeness: The Contingent Role of Innovative Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Yee Cheong Yong & Nur Emma Mustaffa, 2013. "Critical success factors for Malaysian construction projects: an empirical assessment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 959-978, September.
    9. Yehiel Rosenfeld, 2009. "Cost of quality versus cost of non-quality in construction: the crucial balance," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 107-117.
    10. Rockart, John F. (John Fralick), 1982. "The changing role of the information systems executive : a critical success factors perspective," Working papers 1297-82. Report (Alfred P, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    11. Teijeiro, Mercedes & Rungo, Paolo & Freire, Mª Jesús, 2013. "Graduate competencies and employability: The impact of matching firms’ needs and personal attainments," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 286-295.
    12. Gerry Dickinson, 2001. "Enterprise Risk Management: Its Origins and Conceptual Foundation*," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 26(3), pages 360-366, July.
    13. Atanu Sengupta & Sanjoy De, 2020. "Review of Literature," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Assessing Performance of Banks in India Fifty Years After Nationalization, chapter 0, pages 15-30, Springer.
    14. David James Bryde & Jurgen Marc Volm, 2009. "Perceptions of owners in German construction projects: congruence with project risk theory," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 1059-1071.
    15. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    16. Ana Alvarenga & Florinda Matos & Radu Godina & João C. O. Matias, 2020. "Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Changiz Valmohammadi & Javad Sofiyabadi & Bahare Kolahi, 2019. "How do Knowledge Management Practices Affect Sustainable Balanced Performance? Mediating Role of Innovation Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild, 2017. "Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley Data," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 230-241.
    19. Shubham Sharma∗ & Ashok Kumar Gupta, 2019. "Risk Identification and Management in Construction Projects: Literature Review," International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Dr. Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, vol. 5(6), pages 224-231.
    20. Yacov Y. Haimes, 1991. "Total Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 169-171, June.
    21. Radek Doskočil & Branislav Lacko, 2018. "Risk Management and Knowledge Management as Critical Success Factors of Sustainability Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, 2021. "Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Xu, Xiaodong & Mu, Yayu & Wang, Juan, 2023. "Corporate risk and financial asset holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Adil El Amri & Rachid Boutti & Salah Oulfarsi & Florence Rodhain & Brahim Bouzahir, 2020. "Carbon financial markets underlying climate risk management, pricing and forecasting: Fundamental analysis," Post-Print hal-03120782, HAL.
    4. Robert Toth & Richard Kasa & Csaba Lentner, 2022. "The Impact of Financial Culture on the Operation of Hungarian SMEs before and during COVID-19," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Wang, Delu & Tong, Xian & Wang, Yadong, 2020. "An early risk warning system for Outward Foreign Direct Investment in Mineral Resource-based enterprises using multi-classifiers fusion," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Sergio Ochoa-Jiménez & Beatriz Alicia Leyva-Osuna & Carlos Armando Jacobo-Hernández & Alma Rocío García-García, 2021. "Knowledge Management in Relation to Innovation and Its Effect on the Sustainability of Mexican Tourism Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Tobias Rebs & Marcus Brandenburg & Stefan Seuring & Margarita Stohler, 2018. "Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 197-237, September.
    8. Assem Abu Hatab & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Abourehab Esmat, 2021. "Risk perception and determinants in small‐ and medium‐sized agri‐food enterprises amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from Egypt," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 187-212, January.
    9. Kumar Virender & Pandey Amrendra & Singh Rahul, 2023. "Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Singh, Nitya P. & Hong, Paul C., 2020. "Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 723-735.
    11. Omar Rabeea Mahdi & Islam A. Nassar, 2021. "The Business Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Strategic Leadership Capabilities and Knowledge Management Processes to Overcome COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, September.
    12. Kotaskova Anna & Belas Jaroslav & Bilan Yuriy & Ajaz Khan Khurram, 2020. "Significant Aspects of Managing Personnel Risk in the SME Sector," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 203-218, June.
    13. Giuliani, Elisa & Martinelli, Arianna & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2016. "Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 192-205.
    14. Anaf Abdulkarem & Wenhua Hou, 2022. "The Influence of the Environment on Cross-Border E-Commerce Adoption Levels Among SMEs in China: The Mediating Role of Organizational Context," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    15. Rana, Mohammad B. & Elo, Maria, 2017. "Transnational Diaspora and Civil Society Actors Driving MNE Internationalisation: The Case of Grameenphone in Bangladesh," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 87-106.
    16. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Ana Maria Ifrim & Ramona Camelia Silvestru & Monica Ioana Toader, 2021. "Improving Business Processes in a Construction Project and Increasing Performance by Using Target Costing," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    17. José María López-Sanz & Azucena Penelas-Leguía & Pablo Gutiérrez-Rodríguez & Pedro Cuesta-Valiño, 2021. "Sustainable Development and Consumer Behavior in Rural Tourism—The Importance of Image and Loyalty for Host Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    19. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Ann Majchrzak, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Vigilant Interaction in Knowledge Collaboration: Challenges of Online User Participation Under Ambivalence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 773-784, December.
    20. Ludivine Ravat & Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Sandrine Hollet-Haudebert, 2023. "Data-driven innovation capability of marketing: an exploratory study of its components and underlying processes," Post-Print hal-04151199, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9711-:d:882249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.