IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p5890-d279523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Furmankiewicz

    (Department of Spatial Economy, The Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Adrian Campbell

    (International Development Department, School of Government and Society, University of Birmingham, Birmingham 15 2TT, UK)

Abstract

The paper explores and compares the aims of the three most common legal forms of inter-municipal cooperation in Poland (engaging rural, urban-rural and urban municipalities) during the years 1990–2018: Mono-sectoral Special Purpose Unions, Municipal Associations and cross-sectoral Local Action Groups. Content analysis was applied and development priorities from the statutes and strategies were studied. The main form of territorial association evolved from, initially, mono-functional bodies concerned mainly with local infrastructural investment and managed solely by a group of local authorities, to a devolved type, consisting of multi-purpose associations managed with the participation of economic and third sector representatives. This was the result of the European Union policy of promoting territorial governance and integrated development in functional regions, this being considered as part of the process of Europeanisation. However, these successive forms of municipal cooperation do not appear to have replaced the pre-existing forms, but they have introduced additional modes of governance of local resources. The findings show that the most “integrated” and “sustainable” management of local resources is observed mainly in cross-sectoral partnerships, like Local Action Groups, but not so often in mono-sectoral municipal unions and associations led solely by local government and focused more on hard infrastructure and municipal facilities. However, given the specialisation shown by each of the three types of association, it is likely that the full range of development possibilities in the areas concerned can only be realised if all three forms of cooperation are present. The analysis confirms the positive role of local economic and social sector participation in shaping sustainable development. The findings also indicate the utility of the concept of cross-sectoral territorial partnerships in post-socialist and post-authoritarian countries lacking traditions of grassroots or participative development.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5890-:d:279523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5890/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5890/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Przybyła & Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska & Marian Kachniarz, 2014. "Quality of Life in the Regional Capitals of Poland," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 181-196.
    2. Mieke Meurs & Renata Kochut, "undated". "Local Government Performance in Rural Poland: What Matters?," Working Papers 2013-09, American University, Department of Economics.
    3. Marek Furmankiewicz, 2012. "Leader+ Territorial Governance In Poland: Successes And Failures As A Rational Choice Effect," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 103(3), pages 261-275, July.
    4. Gyorgy Aldorfai & Lilla Czabadai & Zoltan Topa, 2016. "An Innovative Methodology For Supporting The Clld," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(1), pages 7-17, June.
    5. José Antonio Cañete & Francisco Navarro & Eugenio Cejudo, 2018. "Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 726-744, April.
    6. Ian Bowler, 1999. "Endogenous Agricultural Development in Western Europe," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 90(3), pages 260-271, August.
    7. Siti Nuryanah & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2015. "The Context of the Case Study," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Corporate Governance and Financial Management, chapter 5, pages 145-156, Palgrave Macmillan.
    8. Steven Brent Lackey & David Freshwater & Anil Rupasingha, 2002. "Factors Influencing Local Government Cooperation in Rural Areas: Evidence from the Tennessee Valley," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 16(2), pages 138-154, May.
    9. Chmieliński, Paweł & Faccilongo, Nicola & Fiore, Mariantonietta & La Sala, Piermichele, 2018. "Design and implementation of the Local Development Strategy: a case study of Polish and Italian Local Action Groups in 2007-2013," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(1), April.
    10. Doitchinova Julia & Miteva Albena & Stoyanova Zornitsa, 2012. "The Process of Creating Local Action Groups in Bulgaria - Problems and Prospects," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 59(2), pages 183-208, December.
    11. Reto Steiner, 2003. "The causes, spread and effects of intermunicipal cooperation and municipal mergers in Switzerland," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 551-571, December.
    12. Naydenov, Nikolay & Bogdanova, Zornitsa, 2007. "Strategic & organizational problems of "LEADER" approach application as a tool for sustainable rural development in Bulgaria," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 5, pages 1-9.
    13. Katarzyna Kopczewska & Paweł Churski & Artur Ochojski & Adam Polko, 2017. "Measuring Regional Specialisation," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-51505-2, June.
    14. Judit Katona-Kovacs & Chris High & Gusztav Nemes, 2011. "Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1138, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    15. Doitchinova, Julia & Stoyanova, Zornitsa, 2014. "Activation Of Local Communities For Development Of Rural Areas," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Mark Scott, 2002. "Delivering Integrated Rural Development: Insights from Northern Ireland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(8), pages 1013-1025, December.
    17. Rebecca Abers, 1998. "From Clientelism to Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(4), pages 511-537, December.
    18. Petrick, Martin, 2013. "Reversing the rural race to the bottom: an evolutionary model of neo-endogenous rural development," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 40(4), pages 707-735.
    19. Kis, Krisztian & Gal, Jozsef & Veha, Antal, 2012. "Effectiveness, Efficiency And Sustainability In Local Rural Development Partnerships," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 6(3-4), pages 1-8, November.
    20. Petrick, Martin & Gramzow, Andreas, 2012. "Harnessing Communities, Markets and the State for Public Goods Provision: Evidence from Post-Socialist Rural Poland," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(11), pages 2342-2354.
    21. Dominic Stead, 2014. "The Rise of Territorial Governance in European Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 1368-1383, July.
    22. Robert Bennett, 1997. "Administrative Systems and Economic Spaces," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 323-336.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Furmankiewicz, Marek & Hewitt, Richard J. & Kazak, Jan K., 2021. "Can rural stakeholders drive the low-carbon transition? Analysis of climate-related activities planned in local development strategies in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Kołat & Marek Furmankiewicz & Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska, 2022. "What Are the Needs of City Dwellers in Terms of the Development of Public Spaces? A Case Study of Participatory Budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Eugenio Cejudo-García & Francisco Navarro-Valverde & José Antonio Cañete-Pérez, 2022. "Who Decides and Who Invests? The Role of the Public, Private and Third Sectors in Rural Development according to Geographical Contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Christian Bergholz & Ivo Bischoff, 2018. "Local council members’ view on intermunicipal cooperation: does office-related self-interest matter?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 1624-1635, December.
    5. Thuessen Annette Aagaard & Nielsen Niels Christian, 2014. "A Territorial Perspective On Eu´S Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 6(4), pages 307-326, December.
    6. Christian Bergholz & Ivo Bischoff, 2015. "Citizens‘ preferences for inter-municipal cooperation in rural areas: evidence from a survey in three Hessian counties," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201523, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    7. Jan K. Kazak & Jakub Chruściński & Szymon Szewrański, 2018. "The Development of a Novel Decision Support System for the Location of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Jurga Bučaitė-Vilkė & Joanna Krukowska, 2020. "Rethinking Suburban Governance in the CEE Region: A Comparison of Two Municipalities in Poland and Lithuania," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 242-252.
    9. Blaeschke, Frédéric & Haug, Peter, 2014. "Does Intermunicipal Cooperation Increase Efficiency? Evidence from the Hessian Wastewater Sector," IWH Discussion Papers 11/2014, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    10. Jiří, Průša & Ondřej, Konečný & Jiří, Hrabák & Michal, Lošťák, 2022. "Beyond the story of the LEADER projects: Are organic farmers actors of multifunctionality and rural development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. J. Francisco Rangel-Preciado & Francisco M. Parejo-Moruno & Esteban Cruz-Hidalgo & Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez, 2021. "Rural Districts and Business Agglomerations in Low-Density Business Environments. The Case of Extremadura (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Antunes Junior, Wolney Felippe & Borsatto, Ricardo Serra & Souza-Esquerdo, Vanilde Ferreira de, 2021. "Why is it so difficult to promote territorial development through public policies? The obstacles faced by a Brazilian experience," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    13. Biczkowski Mirosław, 2020. "LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 24(4), pages 232-244, October.
    14. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Counterbalancing the Development Territorial Disparities in the Implementation of the Community-Led Local Development EU Approach in Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Konečný Ondřej, 2019. "The Leader Approach Across The European Union: One Method of Rural Development, Many Forms of Implementation," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Veronica Devenin & Constanza Bianchi, 2018. "Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 866-879, September.
    17. Carmenta, Rachel & Cammelli, Federico & Dressler, Wolfram & Verbicaro, Camila & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2021. "Between a rock and a hard place: The burdens of uncontrolled fire for smallholders across the tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    18. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.
    19. Novy, Andreas & Leubolt, Bernhard, 2004. "Das Partizipative Budget in Porto Alegre. Die Dialektik von staatlichen und nicht-staatlichen Formen sozialer Innovation," SRE-Discussion Papers 2004/03, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    20. Anne Ventura & Van‐Loc Ta & Tristan Senga Kiessé & Stéphanie Bonnet, 2021. "Design of concrete : Setting a new basis for improving both durability and environmental performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 233-247, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5890-:d:279523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.