IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5171-d801028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Are the Needs of City Dwellers in Terms of the Development of Public Spaces? A Case Study of Participatory Budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Kołat

    (Institute of Spatial Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzka St. 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Marek Furmankiewicz

    (Institute of Spatial Management, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzka St. 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska

    (Department of Applied Economics, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24A, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Participatory Budgeting (PB) is considered a human-centered method of public resource management and investment planning, which strongly reflects the needs of the inhabitants of the municipality. The aim of this article is to assess the structure of the inhabitants’ needs expressed in the PB procedures in Częstochowa, Poland and their relation to the social and demographic characteristics of the city districts. The standard methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis were used (Pearson correlation coefficient and content analysis of the municipal documents), based on the data about: (1) the projects implemented in Częstochowa PB in the years 2015–2019; (2) the age structures and population density in the districts; and (3) qualitative data on district development characteristics. Based on the authors’ typology of projects, it was found that the most popular tasks were related to the comfort and safety of mobility and recreational facilities used for spending free time in public spaces. A relatively lower level of activity of the citizens was found when expressing their needs in central, densely populated districts with a high share of people aged over 65, and a relatively higher level of activity was found in the districts with a high proportion of people aged 0–18 and with lower population density. In the densely populated central districts, relatively high interest in the development of green areas was observed, while in the less populated developing peripheral districts, the preferred infrastructure was related to mobility. These correlations can be logically explained by the conditions related to the development processes of individual districts. The authors conclude that PB can be an important mechanism in determining local needs for the development of public spaces; however, it rewards the needs of the most active social groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Kołat & Marek Furmankiewicz & Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska, 2022. "What Are the Needs of City Dwellers in Terms of the Development of Public Spaces? A Case Study of Participatory Budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5171-:d:801028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Przybyła & Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska & Marian Kachniarz, 2014. "Quality of Life in the Regional Capitals of Poland," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 181-196.
    2. Jorge H. Amorim & Magnuz Engardt & Christer Johansson & Isabel Ribeiro & Magnus Sannebro, 2021. "Regulating and Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Youngmin Oh & Seong-ho Jeong & Heontae Shin, 2019. "A Strategy for a Sustainable Local Government: Are Participatory Governments More Efficient, Effective, and Equitable in the Budget Process?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Sergiu Gherghina & Paul Tap, 2021. "Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Rebecca Abers, 1998. "From Clientelism to Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(4), pages 511-537, December.
    6. Džinić Jasmina & Svidroňová Mária Murray & Markowska-Bzducha Ewa, 2016. "Participatory Budgeting: A Comparative Study of Croatia, Poland and Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 31-56, June.
    7. Yves Sintomer & Carsten Herzberg & Anja Röcke, 2008. "Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 164-178, March.
    8. Izabela Kurtyka-Marcak & Maria Hełdak & Katarzyna Przybyła, 2019. "The Actual Demand for the Elimination of Architectural Barriers among Senior Citizens in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Matteo Bassoli, 2012. "Participatory Budgeting in Italy: An Analysis of (Almost Democratic) Participatory Governance Arrangements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 1183-1203, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna A. Kamińska & Guido Sciavicco & Jan K. Kazak, 2023. "Sustainable Cities and Regions—Statistical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-3, May.
    2. Jan K. Kazak & Katarzyna Hodor & Magdalena Wilkosz-Mamcarczyk, 2022. "Climate Change and Current Challenges for Landscapes and Cultural Heritage," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-3, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    2. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:2:id:576 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Katarzyna Przybyła & Maria Hełdak & Izabela Kurtyka-Marcak, 2019. "Demand for a Housing Offer Addressed to Senior Citizens in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Sergiu Gherghina & Paul Tap, 2021. "Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Martina Balazova & Daniel Klimovsky & Maria Murray Svidronova, 2022. "Determinants of combining budgetary innovations at the local level: experience from Slovakia," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 46(3), pages 355-383.
    6. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Martina Benzoni Baláž & Juraj Nemec, 2022. "Electronic support of participatory budgeting in Slovakia? [Elektronická podpora participatívneho rozpočtovania na Slovensku]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(2), pages 39-50.
    8. Cuenca Botey, Luis Emilio & Célérier, Laure, 2023. "On the relentless labour of deconstructing domination logics: The case of decolonial critical accounting research in South America," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Müge Yetkin Ataer, 2022. "Participatory Budgeting: A Critical Approach," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 72(72-1), pages 361-384, June.
    10. Novy, Andreas & Leubolt, Bernhard, 2004. "Das Partizipative Budget in Porto Alegre. Die Dialektik von staatlichen und nicht-staatlichen Formen sozialer Innovation," SRE-Discussion Papers 2004/03, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    11. Aaron Schneider, 2006. "Responding to fiscal stress: Fiscal institutions and fiscal adjustment in four Brazilian states," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 402-425.
    12. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    13. Dale, Elina & Peacocke, Elizabeth F. & Movik, Espen & Voorhoeve, Alex & Ottersen, Trygve & Kurowski, Christoph & Evans, David B. & Norheim, Ole Frithjof & Gopinathan, Unni, 2023. "Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119799, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Philipp Horn & Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Beth Chitekwe-Biti & Jack Makau, 2018. "Towards citywide participatory planning: emerging community-led practices in three African cities," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 342018, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    15. Ana Paula Pimentel Walker, 2015. "The Conflation of Participatory Budgeting and Public–Private Partnerships in Porto Alegre, Brazil: The Construction of a Working-Class Mall for Street Hawkers," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 165-184, January.
    16. Kazak Jan K. & Hendricks Andreas & Simeunović Nataša, 2019. "Hidden Public Value Identification of Real Estate Management Decisions," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(4), pages 96-104, December.
    17. Aleksandra Besser & Jan K. Kazak & Małgorzata Świąder & Szymon Szewrański, 2019. "A Customized Decision Support System for Renewable Energy Application by Housing Association," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Suhartono Suhartono & Roy Valiant Salomo & Umanto Eko Prasetyo, 2022. "The Alignment Challenges of Development Planning and Budgeting: Insights from Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 54-83, August.
    19. Małgorzata Świąder & Szymon Szewrański & Jan K. Kazak, 2018. "Foodshed as an Example of Preliminary Research for Conducting Environmental Carrying Capacity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Katarzyna Przybyła & Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska, 2018. "Transformations and the Level of Tourist Function Development in Polish Voivodeship Capital Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    21. Capaccioli, Andrea & Poderi, Giacomo & Bettega, Mela & D'Andrea, Vincenzo, 2017. "Exploring participatory energy budgeting as a policy instrument to foster energy justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 621-630.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5171-:d:801028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.