Local Government Performance in Rural Poland: What Matters?
The 1990s saw widespread decentralization of government in the former socialist countries of East-Central Europe and Eurasia. The reforms shared a goal of improving government performance by increasing accountability, bringing decisions more in line with the preferences of populations, and exploiting locally available information in decision-making. However, outcomes have varied significantly, even within countries, among local governments operating in a uniform institutional framework. In this paper, we combine publically-available municipal-level data with data from a unique 2005 survey of municipalities to examine and explain variations in the performance of rural local governments in Poland over the periods 2003-2005 and 2006-2008. Rural governments face particular obstacles to good performance including, in some places, lower resource bases, fewer people of working age, and less-developed infrastructure. Drawing on a growing theoretical and empirical literature on local government performance in developing and former socialist economies, we analyze the role of local government characteristics (skill and accountability), European Union support, and inherited factors (economic development and orientation, location) in three measures of performance, using a simple, OLS framework, a set of representative cases, and a mapping of high- and low-performing gminas. We find that decentralization outcomes vary significantly across municipalities and that the factors associated with success are not consistent across measures or over time. Still, some variables measuring local government skill, mayoral networking, and electoral accountability have an impact on some measures of performance. These findings echo pervious work in both developing and post-socialist countries. An additional important finding is that factors outside the control of local governments, including location, infrastructure, and historical levels and types of economic activity are strongly related to outcomes but, again, the significant variables differ across outcome measures. In the 2006-2008 period, EU transfers per citizen have a consistent positive impact on own per capita revenue outcomes of municipalities, but not on other outcomes, and result in only small changes in the impact of other factors.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:amu:wpaper:2013-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Meal)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.