IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2707-d161375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Country Sustainability Performance Using Ensembles of Neuro-Fuzzy Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Mehrbakhsh Nilashi

    (Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Malaysia)

  • Fausto Cavallaro

    (Department of Economics, University of Molise, Via De Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy)

  • Abbas Mardani

    (Department of Business Administration, Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Malaysia)

  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

    (Institute of Sustainable Construction Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Sauletekio al. 11, Vilnius LT-210223, Lithuania)

  • Sarminah Samad

    (CBA Research Centre, Department of Business Administration, Collage of Business and Administration, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Othman Ibrahim

    (Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Malaysia)

Abstract

Global warming is one of the most important challenges nowadays. Sustainability practices and technologies have been proven to significantly reduce the amount of energy consumed and incur economic savings. Sustainability assessment tools and methods have been developed to support decision makers in evaluating the developments in sustainable technology. Several sustainability assessment tools and methods have been developed by fuzzy logic and neural network machine learning techniques. However, a combination of neural network and fuzzy logic, neuro-fuzzy, and the ensemble learning of this technique has been rarely explored when developing sustainability assessment methods. In addition, most of the methods developed in the literature solely rely on fuzzy logic. The main shortcoming of solely using the fuzzy logic rule-based technique is that it cannot automatically learn from the data. This problem of fuzzy logic has been solved by the use of neural networks in many real-world problems. The combination of these two techniques will take the advantages of both to precisely predict the output of a system. In addition, combining the outputs of several predictors can result in an improved accuracy in complex systems. This study accordingly aims to propose an accurate method for measuring countries’ sustainability performance using a set of real-world data of the sustainability indicators. The adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) technique was used for discovering the fuzzy rules from data from 128 countries, and ensemble learning was used for measuring the countries’ sustainability performance. The proposed method aims to provide the country rankings in term of sustainability. The results of this research show that the method has potential to be effectively implemented as a decision-making tool for measuring countries’ sustainability performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Fausto Cavallaro & Abbas Mardani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Sarminah Samad & Othman Ibrahim, 2018. "Measuring Country Sustainability Performance Using Ensembles of Neuro-Fuzzy Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2707-:d:161375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huiru Zhao & Nana Li, 2016. "Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Fausto Cavallaro, 2015. "A Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System for Developing a Sustainability Index of Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Nikolić, Vlastimir & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Petković, Dalibor & Mohammadi, Kasra & Ćojbašić, Žarko & Altameem, Torki A. & Gani, Abdullah, 2015. "Wind wake influence estimation on energy production of wind farm by adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 361-372.
    4. Ivan Halkijevic & Zivko Vukovic & Drazen Vouk, 2017. "Indicators and a Neuro-Fuzzy Based Model for the Evaluation of Water Supply Sustainability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(12), pages 3683-3698, September.
    5. Afris Widya-Hasuti & Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Ali Sharifara & Fausto Cavallaro, 2018. "The Role of Process Innovation between Firm-Specific Capabilities and Sustainable Innovation in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Al-Ghandoor, Ahmed & Samhouri, Murad & Al-Hinti, Ismael & Jaber, Jamal & Al-Rawashdeh, Mohammad, 2012. "Projection of future transport energy demand of Jordan using adaptive neuro-fuzzy technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 128-135.
    7. Nikolić, Vlastimir & Petković, Dalibor & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Ćojbašić, Žarko, 2015. "Adaptive neuro-fuzzy estimation of diffuser effects on wind turbine performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 324-333.
    8. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    9. Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Keivani, Afram & Mohammadi, Kasra & Lee, Malrey & Hamid, Siti Hafizah Abd & Petkovic, Dalibor, 2016. "Assessing the proficiency of adaptive neuro-fuzzy system to estimate wind power density: Case study of Aligoodarz, Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 429-435.
    10. Phillis, Yannis A. & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, Luc A., 2001. "Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 435-456, June.
    11. Mellit, Adel & Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2011. "ANFIS-based modelling for photovoltaic power supply system: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 250-258.
    12. Hediger, Werner, 2000. "Sustainable development and social welfare," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 481-492, March.
    13. Petković, Dalibor & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Kamsin, Amirrudin & Lee, Malrey & Anicic, Obrad & Nikolić, Vlastimir, 2016. "Survey of the most influential parameters on the wind farm net present value (NPV) by adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1270-1278.
    14. Naji, Sareh & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Basser, Hossein & Keivani, Afram & Alengaram, U. Johnson & Jumaat, Mohd Zamin & Petković, Dalibor, 2016. "Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology for estimating building energy consumption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1520-1528.
    15. Fernandez-Jimenez, L. Alfredo & Muñoz-Jimenez, Andrés & Falces, Alberto & Mendoza-Villena, Montserrat & Garcia-Garrido, Eduardo & Lara-Santillan, Pedro M. & Zorzano-Alba, Enrique & Zorzano-Santamaria,, 2012. "Short-term power forecasting system for photovoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 311-317.
    16. Phillis, Yannis A. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S., 2011. "Sustainability ranking and improvement of countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 542-553, January.
    17. Yang, Zhiling & Liu, Yongqian & Li, Chengrong, 2011. "Interpolation of missing wind data based on ANFIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 993-998.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucija Bukvić & Jasmina Pašagić Škrinjar & Tomislav Fratrović & Borna Abramović, 2022. "Price Prediction and Classification of Used-Vehicles Using Supervised Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Shahla Asadi & Rabab Ali Abumalloh & Sarminah Samad & Fahad Ghabban & Eko Supriyanto & Reem Osman, 2021. "Sustainability Performance Assessment Using Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) and Classification and Ensembles of Regression Trees (CART)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Wojciech Sałabun & Krzysztof Palczewski & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2019. "Multicriteria Approach to Sustainable Transport Evaluation under Incomplete Knowledge: Electric Bikes Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Michael Gr. Voskoglou, 2019. "Methods for Assessing Human–Machine Performance under Fuzzy Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Ramin Gharizadeh Beiragh & Reza Alizadeh & Saeid Shafiei Kaleibari & Fausto Cavallaro & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Romualdas Bausys & Abbas Mardani, 2020. "An integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainability Performance Assessment for Insurance Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Jasna Petković & Nataša Petrović & Ivana Dragović & Kristina Stanojević & Jelena Andreja Radaković & Tatjana Borojević & Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar, 2019. "Youth and forecasting of sustainable development pillars: An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Ahmed Elbeltagi & R. K. Jaiswal & R. V. Galkate & Manish Kumar & A. K. Lohani & Jaiveer Tyagi, 2023. "Modeling Soil Water Retention Under Different Pressures Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(4), pages 1519-1538, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jianzhou & Dong, Yunxuan & Zhang, Kequan & Guo, Zhenhai, 2017. "A numerical model based on prior distribution fuzzy inference and neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 486-497.
    2. Werner Hediger, 2013. "From Multifunctionality and Sustainability of Agriculture to the Social Responsibility of the Agri-food System," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 6(1), pages 59-80.
    3. Andriantiatsaholiniaina, Luc A. & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. & Phillis, Yannis A., 2004. "Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 149-172, February.
    4. Jarkko Levänen & Mokter Hossain & Tatu Lyytinen & Anne Hyvärinen & Sini Numminen & Minna Halme, 2015. "Implications of Frugal Innovations on Sustainable Development: Evaluating Water and Energy Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Jam Shahzaib Khan & Rozana Zakaria & Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin & Nur Izie Adiana Abidin & Shaza Rina Sahamir & Darul Nafis Abbas & Eeydzah Aminudin, 2019. "Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Evangelos Grigoroudis & Vassilis S. Kouikoglou & Yannis A. Phillis & Fotis D. Kanellos, 2021. "Energy sustainability: a definition and assessment model," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1845-1885, September.
    7. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    8. Liu, Xinyu & Liu, Gengyuan & Yang, Zhifeng & Chen, Bin & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2016. "Comparing national environmental and economic performances through emergy sustainability indicators: Moving environmental ethics beyond anthropocentrism toward ecocentrism," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1532-1542.
    9. Paolo Cupo & Rinalda Alberta Di Cerbo, 2016. "The determinants of ranking in sustainable efficiency of Italian farms," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 141-159.
    10. Fausto Cavallaro, 2015. "A Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System for Developing a Sustainability Index of Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Mateusz Piwowarski & Danuta Miłaszewicz & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2018. "Application of the Vector Measure Construction Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity Ideal Solution for the Analysis of the Dynamics of Changes in the Poverty Levels in the European ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Phillis, Yannis A. & Kouikoglou, Vassilis S., 2012. "System-of-Systems hierarchy of biodiversity conservation problems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 235, pages 36-48.
    13. Helen Scarborough & Jeff Bennett, 2012. "Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14376.
    14. Rebecca L. H. Chiu, 2002. "Social equity in housing in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: a social sustainability perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 155-162.
    15. Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2017. "Exposing the attractors of evolving complex adaptive systems by utilising futures images: Milestones of the food sustainability journey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 214-225.
    16. Salvo Creaco & Giulio Querini, 2003. "The role of tourism in sustainable economic development," ERSA conference papers ersa03p84, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Rabee Rustum & Anu Mary John Kurichiyanil & Shaun Forrest & Corrado Sommariva & Adebayo J. Adeloye & Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani & Miklas Scholz, 2020. "Sustainability Ranking of Desalination Plants Using Mamdani Fuzzy Logic Inference Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Suganthi, L. & Iniyan, S. & Samuel, Anand A., 2015. "Applications of fuzzy logic in renewable energy systems – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 585-607.
    19. Ernesto Leon-Castro & Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Victor Alfaro-Garcia & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Jose M. Merigo, 2021. "Fuzzy systems in innovation and sustainability," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 377-383, December.
    20. Gengyuan Liu & Mark T. Brown & Marco Casazza, 2017. "Enhancing the Sustainability Narrative through a Deeper Understanding of Sustainable Development Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2707-:d:161375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.