IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i2p478-d131379.html

Analysis of Trends and Emerging Technologies in Water Electrolysis Research Based on a Computational Method: A Comparison with Fuel Cell Research

Author

Listed:
  • Takaya Ogawa

    (SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
    Current address: Department of Socio-Environmental Energy Science, Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.)

  • Mizutomo Takeuchi

    (Department of Technology and Innovation Management, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 108-0023, Japan, takeuchi@mot.titech.ac.jp (M.T.))

  • Yuya Kajikawa

    (Department of Technology and Innovation Management, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 108-0023, Japan, takeuchi@mot.titech.ac.jp (M.T.))

Abstract

Water electrolysis for hydrogen production has received increasing attention, especially for accumulating renewable energy. Here, we comprehensively reviewed all water electrolysis research areas through computational analysis, using a citation network to objectively detect emerging technologies and provide interdisciplinary data for forecasting trends. The results show that all research areas increase their publication counts per year, and the following two areas are particularly increasing in terms of number of publications: “microbial electrolysis” and “catalysts in an alkaline water electrolyzer (AWE) and in a polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzer (PEME).”. Other research areas, such as AWE and PEME systems, solid oxide electrolysis, and the whole renewable energy system, have recently received several review papers, although papers that focus on specific technologies and are cited frequently have not been published within the citation network. This indicates that these areas receive attention, but there are no novel technologies that are the center of the citation network. Emerging technologies detected within these research areas are presented in this review. Furthermore, a comparison with fuel cell research is conducted because water electrolysis is the reverse reaction to fuel cells, and similar technologies are employed in both areas. Technologies that are not transferred between fuel cells and water electrolysis are introduced, and future water electrolysis trends are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Takaya Ogawa & Mizutomo Takeuchi & Yuya Kajikawa, 2018. "Analysis of Trends and Emerging Technologies in Water Electrolysis Research Based on a Computational Method: A Comparison with Fuel Cell Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:478-:d:131379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kadier, Abudukeremu & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Chandrasekhar, K. & Mohamed, Azah & Azman, Nadia Farhana & Logroño, Washington & Simayi, Yibadatihan & Hamid, Aidil Abdul, 2016. "Recent advances and emerging challenges in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for microbial production of hydrogen and value-added chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 501-525.
    2. Ho, Jonathan C. & Saw, Ewe-Chai & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Liu, John S., 2014. "Technological barriers and research trends in fuel cell technologies: A citation network analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 66-79.
    3. Hedegaard, K. & Meibom, P., 2012. "Wind power impacts and electricity storage – A time scale perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 318-324.
    4. Graves, Christopher & Ebbesen, Sune D. & Mogensen, Mogens & Lackner, Klaus S., 2011. "Sustainable hydrocarbon fuels by recycling CO2 and H2O with renewable or nuclear energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Frank M. Bass, 2004. "Comments on "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables The Bass Model"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1833-1840, December.
    6. Ogawa, Takaya & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2017. "Generating novel research ideas using computational intelligence: A case study involving fuel cells and ammonia synthesis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 41-47.
    7. Beccali, M. & Brunone, S. & Finocchiaro, P. & Galletto, J.M., 2013. "Method for size optimisation of large wind–hydrogen systems with high penetration on power grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 534-544.
    8. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    9. Henry Small, 2006. "Tracking and predicting growth areas in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 68(3), pages 595-610, September.
    10. Wang, Lu & Wei, Yi-Ming & Brown, Marilyn A., 2017. "Global transition to low-carbon electricity: A bibliometric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 57-68.
    11. Naoki Shibata & Yuya Kajikawa & Yoshiyuki Takeda & Katsumori Matsushima, 2009. "Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(3), pages 571-580, March.
    12. Arho Suominen, 2014. "Phases of growth in a green tech research network: a bibliometric evaluation of fuel cell technology from 1991 to 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(1), pages 51-72, July.
    13. Ogawa, Takaya & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2015. "Assessing the industrial opportunity of academic research with patent relatedness: A case study on polymer electrolyte fuel cells," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 469-475.
    14. Takaya Ogawa & Mizutomo Takeuchi & Yuya Kajikawa, 2018. "Comprehensive Analysis of Trends and Emerging Technologies in All Types of Fuel Cells Based on a Computational Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.
    15. Frank M. Bass, 2004. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1825-1832, December.
    16. Wang, Mingyong & Wang, Zhi & Gong, Xuzhong & Guo, Zhancheng, 2014. "The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 573-588.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Higashide, Noriyuki & Zhang, Yi & Asatani, Kimitaka & Miura, Takahiro & Sakata, Ichiro, 2024. "Quantifying advances from basic research to applied research in material science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Woong Hee Lee & Young-Jin Ko & Jung Hwan Kim & Chang Hyuck Choi & Keun Hwa Chae & Hansung Kim & Yun Jeong Hwang & Byoung Koun Min & Peter Strasser & Hyung-Suk Oh, 2021. "High crystallinity design of Ir-based catalysts drives catalytic reversibility for water electrolysis and fuel cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Doyeon Lee & Keunhwan Kim, 2021. "Research and Development Investment and Collaboration Framework for the Hydrogen Economy in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Boguslaw Pierozynski & Tomasz Mikolajczyk & Boguslaw Wojciechowski & Mateusz Luba, 2021. "An Innovative 500 W Alkaline Water Electrolyser System for the Production of Ultra-Pure Hydrogen and Oxygen Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Al Dhahri, Haitham & Hussain, Murid & Ghani, M.A.A. & Inayat, Abrar & Al-Muhtaseb, Ala'a H. & Al-Haj, Lamya & Jamil, Farrukh, 2026. "Green hydrogen production via electrolysis: Materials innovation, system integration, and global deployment pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Rosario Carbone & Concettina Marino & Antonino Nucara & Maria Francesca Panzera & Matilde Pietrafesa, 2019. "Electric Load Influence on Performances of a Composite Plant for Hydrogen Production from RES and its Conversion in Electricity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Norman, E.A. & Maestre, V.M. & Ortiz, A. & Ortiz, I., 2024. "Steam electrolysis for green hydrogen generation. State of the art and research perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    8. Hu, Kewei & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Huang, Danji & Zhong, Zhiyao & Yang, Xiaobo & Wang, Lei, 2022. "Comparative study of alkaline water electrolysis, proton exchange membrane water electrolysis and solid oxide electrolysis through multiphysics modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    9. Yuya Kajikawa, 2022. "Reframing evidence in evidence-based policy making and role of bibliometrics: toward transdisciplinary scientometric research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5571-5585, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Takaya Ogawa & Mizutomo Takeuchi & Yuya Kajikawa, 2018. "Comprehensive Analysis of Trends and Emerging Technologies in All Types of Fuel Cells Based on a Computational Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Ogawa, Takaya & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2017. "Generating novel research ideas using computational intelligence: A case study involving fuel cells and ammonia synthesis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 41-47.
    3. Mejia, Cristian & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2020. "Emerging topics in energy storage based on a large-scale analysis of academic articles and patents," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Cambier, Adrien & Chardy, Matthieu & Figueiredo, Rosa & Ouorou, Adam & Poss, Michael, 2022. "Optimizing subscriber migrations for a telecommunication operator in uncertain context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 308-321.
    5. Bernd Frick & Franziska Prockl, 2018. "Information Precision In Online Communities: Player Valuations On Www.Transfermarkt.De," Working Papers Dissertations 37, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    6. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    7. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Bradley, Thomas H., 2013. "Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling Studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 190-203.
    8. Amini, Mehdi & Li, Haitao, 2011. "Supply chain configuration for diffusion of new products: An integrated optimization approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 313-322, June.
    9. Blandy Pamplona Solis & Julio César Cruz Argüello & Leopoldo Gómez Barba & Mayra Polett Gurrola & Zakaryaa Zarhri & Danna Lizeth TrejoArroyo, 2019. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Mass Transport in a Gas Diffusion Layer in PEM Fuel Cells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Massiani, Jérôme, 2015. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of policies for the development of electric vehicles in Germany: Methods and results," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 19-26.
    11. repec:aen:journl:ej37-si1-liu is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Chumnumpan, Pattarin & Shi, Xiaohui, 2019. "Understanding new products’ market performance using Google Trends," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-103.
    13. Gary Biglaiser & Jacques Crémer & André Veiga, 2020. "Migration between Platforms," CESifo Working Paper Series 8185, CESifo.
    14. Sharad Goel & Ashton Anderson & Jake Hofman & Duncan J. Watts, 2016. "The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 180-196, January.
    15. Bi-Huei Tsai & Yiming Li, 2011. "Modelling competition in global LCD TV industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(22), pages 2969-2981.
    16. Lemmens, Aurélie & Croux, Christophe & Stremersch, Stefan, 2012. "Dynamics in the international market segmentation of new product growth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 81-92.
    17. Franses, Ph.H.B.F. & Lede, M.M., 2010. "Diffusion of counterfeit medical products in a developing country: Empirical evidence for Suriname," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-38, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    18. Chorus, Caspar G., 2015. "Models of moral decision making: Literature review and research agenda for discrete choice analysis," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 69-85.
    19. Biglaiser, Gary & Crémer, Jacques & Veiga, Andre, 2022. "Should I stay or should I go? Migrating away from an incumbent platform," CEPR Discussion Papers 14496, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. A. Negahban & J.S. Smith, 2016. "The effect of supply and demand uncertainties on the optimal production and sales plans for new products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 3852-3869, July.
    21. Jèrome Massiani, 2011. "Modelling and evaluation of the diffusion of electric vehicles: existing models, results, and proposal for a new model," Working Papers 1106, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2011.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:478-:d:131379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.