IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i3p152-d1352889.html

When Women Ask, Does Curiosity Help?

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Mislin

    (Kogod School of Business, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ece Tuncel

    (George Herbert Walker School of Business and Technology, Webster University, Webster Groves, MO 63119, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lucie Prewitt

    (Institute for Policy & Social Research, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA)

Abstract

This research examines the potential social benefits of displaying curiosity during a negotiation. Past research has found women who ask directly in distributive agentic settings can suffer negative social consequences and obtain worse objective outcomes compared to men. In three experiments (N = 600) using different negotiation contexts, we found men and women who approach negotiations with curiosity reap the same economic benefits of asking directly but without incurring a social cost. We also found that perceived warmth partially accounts for the positive effects of curiosity (vs. asking directly) on negotiators’ social outcomes. Finally, our results reveal women feel more comfortable conveying curiosity compared to using a direct approach in their negotiations. We discuss the implications of these findings in enhancing negotiation effectiveness for both women and men.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Mislin & Ece Tuncel & Lucie Prewitt, 2024. "When Women Ask, Does Curiosity Help?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:152-:d:1352889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/152/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/152/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Artz & Amanda H. Goodall & Andrew J. Oswald, 2018. "Do Women Ask?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 611-636, October.
    2. Paula England & Andrew Levine & Emma Mishel, 2020. "Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(13), pages 6990-6997, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araki, Satoshi & Olivos, Francisco, 2025. "Gender inequality, well-being, and ill-being: A macro analysis of human and societal flourishing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    2. Jamin D. Speer, 2020. "Where the girls are: Examining and explaining the gender gap in the nursing major," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(3), pages 322-343, July.
    3. Grissom, Jason A. & Timmer, Jennifer D. & Nelson, Jennifer L. & Blissett, Richard S.L., 2021. "Unequal pay for equal work? Unpacking the gender gap in principal compensation," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. René Böheim & Marian Fink & Christine Zulehner, 2021. "About time: the narrowing gender wage gap in Austria," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 803-843, November.
    5. Eunice S. Han, 2020. "The Effects of Teachers’ Unions on the Gender Pay Gap among U.S. Public School Teachers," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 563-603, October.
    6. Jens Mazei & Julia B. Bear & Joachim Hüffmeier, 2022. "Avoiding Backlash or Proving One’s Manhood? Beliefs About Gender Differences in Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 81-110, February.
    7. Karen Mumford & Cristina Sechel, 2017. "Pay, Rank and Job Satisfaction amongst Academic Economists in the UK," Discussion Papers 17/17, Department of Economics, University of York.
    8. Zuazu-Bermejo, Izaskun, 2022. "Robots and women in manufacturing employment," ifso working paper series 19, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    9. Getinet Astatike Haile, 2021. "Men, women and unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 201-217, May.
    10. Karen Mumford & Cristina Sechel, 2020. "Pay and Job Rank among Academic Economists in the UK: Is Gender Relevant?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(1), pages 82-113, March.
    11. Daniela Grunow & Torsten Lietzmann, 2021. "Women's employment transitions: The influence of her, his, and joint gender ideologies," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(3), pages 55-86.
    12. Anne‐Sophie Bruno & Nathalie Greenan & Jeremy Tanguy, 2021. "Does the Gender Mix Influence Collective Bargaining on Gender Equality? Evidence from France," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 479-520, October.
    13. Katrien Stevens & Stephen Whelan, 2019. "Negotiating the Gender Wage Gap," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 141-188, April.
    14. Alex Bryson & Harald Dale-Olsen & Kristine Nergaard, 2016. "Gender Differences in the Union Wage Premium? A Comparative Case Study," DoQSS Working Papers 16-15, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    15. Cher Hsuehhsiang Li & Basit Zafar, 2020. "Ask and You Shall Receive? Gender Differences in Regrades in College," NBER Working Papers 26703, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Amanda Goodall & Margit Osterloh & Mandy Fong, 2020. "Women Shy Away From Competition – How To Overcome It," CREMA Working Paper Series 2020-21, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. Mensah, Aziz & Toivanen, Susanna & Diewald, Martin & Ul Hassan, Mahmood & Nyberg, Anna, 2022. "Workplace gender harassment, illegitimate tasks, and poor mental health: Hypothesized associations in a Swedish cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    18. Elena De Gioannis, 2025. "Gender-essentialist beliefs and the gender gap in STEM: Evidence on the gender-essentialism theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1229-1251, April.
    19. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo & Brian Rubineau & Venkat Kuppuswamy, 2023. "Reject and Resubmit: A Formal Analysis of Gender Differences in Reapplication and Their Contribution to Women’s Presence in Talent Pipelines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1554-1576, July.
    20. Emilio J. Castilla & Hye Jin Rho, 2023. "The Gendering of Job Postings in the Online Recruitment Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6912-6939, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:152-:d:1352889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.