IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i8p1274-d1633535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness and Efficiency Considerations When Testing Process Reliability with a Limit of Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Laura S. Bumbulis

    (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Richard J. Cook

    (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada)

Abstract

Processes in biotechnology are considered reliable if they produce samples satisfying regulatory benchmarks. For example, laboratories may be required to show that levels of an undesirable analyte rarely (e.g., in less than 5% of samples) exceed a tolerance threshold. This can be challenging when measurement systems feature a lower limit of detection, rendering some observations left-censored. We investigate the implications of detection limits on location-scale model-based inference in reliability studies, including their impact on large and finite sample properties of various estimators and the sensitivity of results to model misspecification. To address the need for robust methods, we introduce a flexible weakly parametric model in which the right tail of the response distribution is approximated using a piecewise-constant hazard model. Simulation studies are reported that investigate the performance of the established and proposed methods, and an illustrative application is given to a study of drinking can weights. We conclude with a discussion of areas warranting future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura S. Bumbulis & Richard J. Cook, 2025. "Robustness and Efficiency Considerations When Testing Process Reliability with a Limit of Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:8:p:1274-:d:1633535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/8/1274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/8/1274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:8:p:1274-:d:1633535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.