IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i4p576-d1338708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Asymmetric Dependence Structure of Air Pollution Characteristics: A Vine Copula Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Sabri Ismail

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nurulkamal Masseran

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Almie Alias

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Sakhinah Abu Bakar

    (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

Contaminated air is unhealthy for people to breathe and live in. To maintain the sustainability of clean air, air pollution must be analyzed and controlled, especially after unhealthy events. To do so, the characteristics of unhealthy events, namely intensity, duration, and severity are studied using multivariate modeling. In this study, the vine copula approach is selected to study the characteristics data. Vine copula is chosen here because it is more potent than the standard multivariate distributions, and multivariate copulas, especially in modeling the tails related to extreme events. Here, all nine different vine copulas are analyzed and compared based on model fitting and the comparison of models. In model fitting, the best model obtained is Rv123-Joint-MLE, a model with a root nodes sequence of 123, and optimized using the joint maximum likelihood. The components for the best model are the Tawn type 1 and Rotated Tawn type 1 180 degrees representing the pair copulas of (intensity, duration), and (intensity, severity), respectively, with the Survival Gumbel for the conditional pair copula of (duration, severity; intensity). Based on the best model, the tri-variate dependence structure of the intensity, duration, and severity relationship is positively correlated, skewed, and follows an asymmetric distribution. This indicates that the characteristic’s, including intensity, duration, and severity, tend to increase together. Using comparison tests, the best model is significantly different from others, whereas only two models are quite similar. This shows that the best model is well-fitted, compared to most models. Overall, this paper highlights the capability of vine copula in modeling the asymmetric dependence structure of air pollution characteristics, where the obtained model has a better potential to become a tool to assess the risks of extreme events in future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Sabri Ismail & Nurulkamal Masseran & Mohd Almie Alias & Sakhinah Abu Bakar, 2024. "Modeling Asymmetric Dependence Structure of Air Pollution Characteristics: A Vine Copula Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:576-:d:1338708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/4/576/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/4/576/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nurulkamal Masseran & Muhammad Aslam Mohd Safari, 2021. "Mixed POT-BM Approach for Modeling Unhealthy Air Pollution Events," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Nurulkamal Masseran, 2021. "Modeling the Characteristics of Unhealthy Air Pollution Events: A Copula Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Trivedi, Pravin K. & Zimmer, David M., 2007. "Copula Modeling: An Introduction for Practitioners," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 1(1), pages 1-111, April.
    4. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    5. Dißmann, J. & Brechmann, E.C. & Czado, C. & Kurowicka, D., 2013. "Selecting and estimating regular vine copulae and application to financial returns," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 52-69.
    6. Jakob Stöber & Ulf Schepsmeier, 2013. "Estimating standard errors in regular vine copula models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2679-2707, December.
    7. Joe, Harry & Li, Haijun & Nikoloulopoulos, Aristidis K., 2010. "Tail dependence functions and vine copulas," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 252-270, January.
    8. Al Janabi, Mazin A.M. & Ferrer, Román & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain, 2019. "Liquidity-adjusted value-at-risk optimization of a multi-asset portfolio using a vine copula approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 536(C).
    9. Brechmann, Eike Christian & Schepsmeier, Ulf, 2013. "Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVine," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 52(i03).
    10. Nurulkamal Masseran & Saiful Izzuan Hussain, 2020. "Copula Modelling on the Dynamic Dependence Structure of Multiple Air Pollutant Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Johannes Stübinger & Benedikt Mangold & Christopher Krauss, 2018. "Statistical arbitrage with vine copulas," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(11), pages 1831-1849, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koliai, Lyes, 2016. "Extreme risk modeling: An EVT–pair-copulas approach for financial stress tests," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-22.
    2. Brechmann, Eike & Czado, Claudia & Paterlini, Sandra, 2014. "Flexible dependence modeling of operational risk losses and its impact on total capital requirements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 271-285.
    3. Li, Haihe & Wang, Pan & Huang, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Zheng & Zhou, Changcong & Yue, Zhufeng, 2021. "Vine copula-based parametric sensitivity analysis of failure probability-based importance measure in the presence of multidimensional dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Dalla Valle, Luciana & De Giuli, Maria Elena & Tarantola, Claudia & Manelli, Claudio, 2016. "Default probability estimation via pair copula constructions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 298-311.
    5. Nurulkamal Masseran, 2022. "Multifractal Characteristics on Temporal Maximum of Air Pollution Series," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Sayed H. Kadhem & Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos, 2023. "Bi-factor and Second-Order Copula Models for Item Response Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 132-157, March.
    7. Mikhail Semenov & Daulet Smagulov, 2017. "Portfolio Risk Assessment using Copula Models," Papers 1707.03516, arXiv.org.
    8. Chemkha, Rahma & BenSaïda, Ahmed & Ghorbel, Ahmed, 2021. "Connectedness between cryptocurrencies and foreign exchange markets: Implication for risk management," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Eling, Martin & Jung, Kwangmin, 2018. "Copula approaches for modeling cross-sectional dependence of data breach losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 167-180.
    10. Zhikai Peng & Jinchuan Ke, 2022. "Spillover Effect of the Interaction between Fintech and the Real Economy Based on Tail Risk Dependent Structure Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Seyyed Ali Zeytoon Nejad Moosavian & Barry K. Goodwin, 2021. "Flexible modelling of multivariate risks in pricing margin protection insurance: modelling portfolio risks with mixtures of mixtures," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 411-440, January.
    12. Jörg Schwiebert, 2016. "Multinomial choice models based on Archimedean copulas," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(3), pages 333-354, July.
    13. Santiago Pereda-Fernández, 2021. "Copula-Based Random Effects Models for Clustered Data," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 575-588, March.
    14. Nagler Thomas & Schellhase Christian & Czado Claudia, 2017. "Nonparametric estimation of simplified vine copula models: comparison of methods," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 99-120, January.
    15. Martin Magris, 2019. "A Vine-copula extension for the HAR model," Papers 1907.08522, arXiv.org.
    16. F. Marta L. Lascio & Simone Giannerini, 2019. "Clustering dependent observations with copula functions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 35-51, February.
    17. Brechmann, Eike C. & Hendrich, Katharina & Czado, Claudia, 2013. "Conditional copula simulation for systemic risk stress testing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 722-732.
    18. Pigini Claudia, 2015. "Bivariate Non-Normality in the Sample Selection Model," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 123-144, January.
    19. Mohamad Khoirun Najib & Sri Nurdiati & Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan, 2022. "Multivariate fire risk models using copula regression in Kalimantan, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1263-1283, September.
    20. Simon Luechinger & Alois Stutzer & Rainer Winkelmann, 2008. "Self-Selection and Subjective Well-Being: Copula Models with an Application to Public and Private Sector Work," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 135, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:4:p:576-:d:1338708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.