IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i19p3600-d931600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Pricing for Multiple Market Segments Considering Consumers’ Willingness to Pay

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Pérez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de Los Andes, Santiago 12455, Chile)

  • Héctor López-Ospina

    (Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de Los Andes, Santiago 12455, Chile)

Abstract

Defining prices and in which consumers’ segments to put the company’s efforts within competitive markets selling bundles is challenging. On the one hand, methodologies focused on competition are usually appropriate for analyzing market dynamics but not for helping decision makers in specific tasks regarding pricing. On the other hand, simplistic cost-oriented methods may fail to capture consumer behavior. We see these characteristics in such markets as telecommunications, retail, and financial service providers, among others. We propose a framework to support pricing decisions for products with multiple attributes in competitive markets, considering consumers’ willingness to pay and multiple segments. The proposed model is a nonlinear profit maximization probabilistic problem. We represent the demands for products and services through a multinomial logit model and then include consumers’ maximum willingness to pay through soft constraints within the demand function. Since the profit function is non-concave, we deal with the nonlinearity and the multiple optima to solve the model through an equivalent nonlinear model and a particle swarm optimization (PSO) heuristic. This setting allows us to find the prices that achieve equilibrium for the game among the firms that maximize their profits. Including the features shown, our approach enables decision makers to set prices optimally. Estimating the parameters needed to run our model requires more effort than traditional multinomial approaches. Nevertheless, we show that it is essential to include these aspects because the optimal prices are different from those obtained with more simplified models that do not have them. Additionally, there are well-established methodologies available to estimate those parameters. Both the determination of the first-order optimality conditions and the PSO implementation allow to find equilibria, quantify the effect of the consumers’ maximum willingness to pay, and assess the competition’s relevance. As complementary material, we analyze a case from a Chilean telecommunications company and show the results regarding price decisions and market share effects. According to our literature review, these aspects have not been handled and quantified jointly, as we do to support pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Pérez & Héctor López-Ospina, 2022. "Competitive Pricing for Multiple Market Segments Considering Consumers’ Willingness to Pay," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3600-:d:931600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. SCHMALENSEE, Richard & THISSE, Jacques-François, 1988. "Perceptual maps and the optimal location of new products: an integrative essay," LIDAM Reprints CORE 840, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Ward Hanson & R. Kipp Martin, 1990. "Optimal Bundle Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 155-174, February.
    3. Dost, Florian & Wilken, Robert, 2012. "Measuring willingness to pay as a range, revisited: When should we care?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 148-166.
    4. Omar Besbes & Denis Sauré, 2016. "Product Assortment and Price Competition under Multinomial Logit Demand," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(1), pages 114-127, January.
    5. Dost, Florian & Geiger, Ingmar, 2017. "Value-based pricing in competitive situations with the help of multi-product price response maps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 219-236.
    6. Lorin M. Hitt & Pei-yu Chen, 2005. "Bundling with Customer Self-Selection: A Simple Approach to Bundling Low-Marginal-Cost Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1481-1493, October.
    7. Mahdi Rezapour & Khaled Ksaibati, 2021. "Accommodating Taste and Scale Heterogeneity for Front-Seat Passenger’ Choice of Seat Belt Usage," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Basu, Amiya & Mazumdar, Tridib & Raj, S.P., 2007. "Components of optimal price under logit demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1084-1106, November.
    9. Schlereth, Christian & Skiera, Bernd, 2012. "Measurement of consumer preferences for bucket pricing plans with different service attributes," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 167-180.
    10. Hongmin Li & Woonghee Tim Huh, 2011. "Pricing Multiple Products with the Multinomial Logit and Nested Logit Models: Concavity and Implications," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 549-563, October.
    11. Mesak, Hani I. & Bari, Abdullahel & Blackstock, Rob, 2016. "On the robustness and strategic implications of a parsimonious advertising – inventory competitive model with extensions to pricing competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 38-47.
    12. Guillermo Gallego & Woonghee Tim Huh & Wanmo Kang & Robert Phillips, 2006. "Price Competition with the Attraction Demand Model: Existence of Unique Equilibrium and Its Stability," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 359-375, June.
    13. Lüer-Villagra, Armin & Marianov, Vladimir, 2013. "A competitive hub location and pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 734-744.
    14. Marisol Castro & Francisco Martínez & Marcela Munizaga, 2013. "Estimation of a constrained multinomial logit model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 563-581, May.
    15. Chang Li & Daniel C. Coster, 2022. "Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms for Optimal Designs with Various Decision Criteria," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Kopczewski, Tomasz & Sobolewski, Maciej & Miernik, Ireneusz, 2018. "Bundling or unbundling? Integrated simulation model of optimal pricing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 328-345.
    17. Goker Aydin & Evan L. Porteus, 2008. "Joint Inventory and Pricing Decisions for an Assortment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1247-1255, October.
    18. Yifei Zhao & Jianhong Chen & Shan Yang & Yi Chen, 2022. "Mining Plan Optimization of Multi-Metal Underground Mine Based on Adaptive Hybrid Mutation PSO Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Xiong-zhi Wang & Wenliang Zhou, 2018. "Integrating Dynamic Pricing and Inventory Control for Fresh Agriproduct under Multinomial Logit Choice," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, December.
    20. Abdelouahed Hamdi & Arezou Karimi & Farshid Mehrdoust & Samir Brahim Belhaouari, 2022. "Portfolio Selection Problem Using CVaR Risk Measures Equipped with DEA, PSO, and ICA Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-26, August.
    21. Francisco Martínez & Pedro Donoso, 2010. "The MUSSA II Land Use Auction Equilibrium Model," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Francesca Pagliara & John Preston & David Simmonds (ed.), Residential Location Choice, pages 99-113, Springer.
    22. Margaret Aksoy-Pierson & Gad Allon & Awi Federgruen, 2013. "Price Competition Under Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(8), pages 1817-1835, August.
    23. Carbajo, Jose & de Meza, David & Seidmann, Daniel J, 1990. "A Strategic Motivation for Commodity Bundling," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 283-298, March.
    24. Li, Yan & Chen, Yefen & Shou, Biying & Zhao, Xiaobo, 2019. "Oligopolistic quantity competition with bounded rationality and social comparison," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 180-196.
    25. Swait, Joffre, 2001. "A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 903-928, November.
    26. Cantillo, Víctor & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2005. "A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 641-657, August.
    27. Juan Pérez & Héctor López-Ospina & Alejandro Cataldo & Juan-Carlos Ferrer, 2016. "Pricing and composition of bundles with constrained multinomial logit," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 3994-4007, July.
    28. Schmalensee, Richard, 1988. "Industrial Economics: An Overview," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(392), pages 643-681, September.
    29. Xiao-Feng Shao, 2015. "Product differentiation design under sequential consumer choice process," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 2342-2364, April.
    30. Page, Kenneth & Pérez, Juan & Telha, Claudio & García-Echalar, Andrés & López-Ospina, Héctor, 2021. "Optimal bundle composition in competition for continuous attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1168-1187.
    31. Dost, Florian & Wilken, Robert & Eisenbeiss, Maik & Skiera, Bernd, 2014. "On the Edge of Buying: A Targeting Approach for Indecisive Buyers Based on Willingness-to-Pay Ranges," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 393-407.
    32. Cataldo, Alejandro & Ferrer, Juan–Carlos, 2017. "Optimal pricing and composition of multiple bundles: A two-step approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 766-777.
    33. Guillermo Gallego & Ruxian Wang, 2014. "Multiproduct Price Optimization and Competition Under the Nested Logit Model with Product-Differentiated Price Sensitivities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 450-461, April.
    34. Martínez, Francisco & Aguila, Felipe & Hurtubia, Ricardo, 2009. "The constrained multinomial logit: A semi-compensatory choice model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 365-377, March.
    35. Felipe Caro & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2012. "Product and Price Competition with Satiation Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(7), pages 1357-1373, July.
    36. William James Adams & Janet L. Yellen, 1976. "Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(3), pages 475-498.
    37. Yannis Bakos & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2000. "Bundling and Competition on the Internet," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 63-82, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Page, Kenneth & Pérez, Juan & Telha, Claudio & García-Echalar, Andrés & López-Ospina, Héctor, 2021. "Optimal bundle composition in competition for continuous attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 1168-1187.
    2. H. Sebastian Heese & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2018. "Effects of Assortment Breadth Announcements on Manufacturer Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 302-316, May.
    3. Hai Jiang & Rui Chen & He Sun, 2017. "Multiproduct price optimization under the multilevel nested logit model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 131-164, July.
    4. Kameng Nip & Changjun Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2022. "Competitive and Cooperative Assortment Games under Markov Chain Choice Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1033-1051, March.
    5. Ritwik Raj & Mark H. Karwan & Chase Murray & Lei Sun, 2022. "Itemized pricing in B2B bundles with diminishing reservation prices and loss averse customers," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 375-392, August.
    6. Maxime C. Cohen & Renyu Zhang, 2022. "Competition and coopetition for two‐sided platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1997-2014, May.
    7. José Luis Espinosa-Aranda & Ricardo García-Ródenas & María Luz López-García & Eusebio Angulo, 2018. "Constrained nested logit model: formulation and estimation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1523-1557, September.
    8. Chung‐seung Lee & Metin Çakanyildirim, 2021. "Price Competition Under Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand: Sufficiency Conditions for Validating the Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3272-3283, September.
    9. Schlicher, Loe & Lurkin, Virginie, 2022. "Stable allocations for choice-based collaborative price setting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1242-1254.
    10. Li, Minqiang & Feng, Haiyang & Chen, Fuzan & Kou, Jisong, 2013. "Numerical investigation on mixed bundling and pricing of information products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 560-571.
    11. Hemant K. Bhargava, 2013. "Mixed Bundling of Two Independently Valued Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(9), pages 2170-2185, September.
    12. Kopczewski, Tomasz & Sobolewski, Maciej & Miernik, Ireneusz, 2018. "Bundling or unbundling? Integrated simulation model of optimal pricing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 328-345.
    13. Torsten J. Gerpott & Jan Berends, 2022. "Competitive pricing on online markets: a literature review," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 596-622, December.
    14. Kim Huat Goh & Jesse C. Bockstedt, 2013. "The Framing Effects of Multipart Pricing on Consumer Purchasing Behavior of Customized Information Good Bundles," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 334-351, June.
    15. Jing-Sheng Song & Zhengliang Xue, 2021. "Demand Shaping Through Bundling and Product Configuration: A Dynamic Multiproduct Inventory-Pricing Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 525-544, March.
    16. Woonghee Tim Huh & Hongmin Li, 2015. "Technical Note—Pricing Under the Nested Attraction Model with a Multistage Choice Structure," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 840-850, August.
    17. Xiaobo Li & Hailong Sun & Chung Piaw Teo, 2022. "Convex Optimization for Bundle Size Pricing Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1095-1106, February.
    18. Tarek Abdallah, 2019. "On the Benefit (Or Cost) of Large‐Scale Bundling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 955-969, April.
    19. Stole, Lars A., 2007. "Price Discrimination and Competition," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 34, pages 2221-2299, Elsevier.
    20. Li, Jianbin & Liu, Lang & Luo, Xiaomeng & Zhu, Stuart X., 2023. "Interactive bundle pricing strategy for online pharmacies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3600-:d:931600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.