IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1476-d1201667.html

Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Total Factor Productivity of Grain in the Yangtze River Delta, China

Author

Listed:
  • Fenghua Wen

    (School of Government, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Donghan Lyu

    (School of Government, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Daohan Huang

    (School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100041, China)

Abstract

The total factor productivity of grain (TFPG) is critically important to secure food production, while its spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the urbanized area is largely ignored. Selecting 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta, this study uses the data envelopment analysis (DEA) Malmquist index method to measure the TFPG in each city from 2012 to 2020 based on panel data, and explores the driving factors of the spatiotemporal evolution of the TFPG with the geographically and temporally weighted regression model. The results indicate the following: (1) Both the TFPG and technological progress varies in the same direction, indicating that technological progress dominates the TFPG in the studied region. The changes in technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency are relatively stable. (2) The spatial distribution of the TFPG shows a decentralized trend, with a pattern of high in the north and east areas and low in the south and west areas. (3) The driving factors, such as the development level of the grain economy, the amount of fertilizer used per unit area, and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, have a restraining effect on the improvement of the TFPG, in which the amount of fertilizer used per unit area is the critical factor. (4) The scale of per capita labor operation, the proportion of the grain-growing population, and output of grain per hectare exert a promoting effect on the TFPG, in which both the proportion of the grain-growing population and output of grain per hectare are the critical factors. Finally, improving the efficiency of fertilizer use, expanding the production scale of the grain planting industry, and increasing the output of grain per hectare are proposed to improve the TFGP in the Yangtze River Delta.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenghua Wen & Donghan Lyu & Daohan Huang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Total Factor Productivity of Grain in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1476-:d:1201667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheng, Yu & Chancellor, Will, 2019. "Exploring the relationship between farm size and productivity: Evidence from the Australian grains industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 196-204.
    2. Bayarsaihan, T. & Coelli, T. J., 2003. "Productivity growth in pre-1990 Mongolian agriculture: spiralling disaster or emerging success?," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-137, March.
    3. Huaxi Yuan & Yidai Feng & Jay Lee & Haimeng Liu, 2020. "The Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of Financial Agglomeration on Green Development in China Cities Using GTWR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Md Kamrul Hossain & Anton Abdulbasah Kamil & Md Azizul Baten & Adli Mustafa, 2012. "Stochastic Frontier Approach and Data Envelopment Analysis to Total Factor Productivity and Efficiency Measurement of Bangladeshi Rice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, October.
    5. Suk-won Choi & Brent Sohngen & Steven Rose & Tom Hertel & Alla Golub, 2011. "Total Factor Productivity Change in Agriculture and Emissions from Deforestation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(2), pages 349-355.
    6. Dehua Zhang & Haiqing Wang & Sha Lou & Shen Zhong, 2021. "Research on grain production efficiency in China’s main grain producing areas from the perspective of financial support," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Zhihao Zheng & Shen Cheng & Shida R. Henneberry, 2023. "Total factor productivity change in China's grain production sector: 1980–2018," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 38-55, January.
    8. Key, Nigel, 2019. "Farm size and productivity growth in the United States Corn Belt," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 186-195.
    9. Eric Njuki & Boris E Bravo-Ureta & Christopher J O’Donnell, 2018. "A new look at the decomposition of agricultural productivity growth incorporating weather effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Bingfei Bao & Shengtian Jin & Lilian Li & Kaifeng Duan & Xiaomei Gong, 2021. "Analysis of Green Total Factor Productivity of Grain and Its Dynamic Distribution: Evidence from Poyang Lake Basin, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liqing Xue & Huawei Niu & Wenlong Cui, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Grain Green Production Efficiency in China Under the Human Capital Perspective—A Study Based on Geographic Detector," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9123-9160, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aragón, Fernando M. & Restuccia, Diego & Rud, Juan Pablo, 2022. "Are small farms really more productive than large farms?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Noumir, Ashraf & Langemeier, Michael R., 2021. "Farm Size and the Cross-Section of Farm Returns," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313880, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Ryota Nakatani, 2024. "Food companies' productivity dynamics: Exploring the role of intangible assets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 185-226, January.
    4. Steele C. West & Amin W. Mugera & Ross S. Kingwell, 2024. "The impact of repayment obligations arising as a by‐product of input use on partial inefficiency: Evidence from Western Australian farm businesses," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 68(3), pages 678-700, July.
    5. Rangalal Mohapatra & Bondona Lama, 2024. "An analysis of the determinants of productivity of Assam tea growers," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-33, December.
    6. Chancellor, Will & Hughes, Neal & Zhao, Shiji & Soh, Wei Ying & Valle, Haydn & Boult, Christopher, 2021. "Controlling for the effects of climate on total factor productivity: A case study of Australian farms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Lowder, Sarah K. & Sánchez, Marco V. & Bertini, Raffaele, 2021. "Which farms feed the world and has farmland become more concentrated?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    8. Yang Xu & Yujia Huo & Xiangyu Guo, 2024. "Relationship of Arable Land Scale and High-Quality Development of Farmers’ Cooperatives: Evidence from Grain Production Cooperatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-30, March.
    9. Ayerst, Stephen & Brandt, Loren & Restuccia, Diego, 2020. "Market constraints, misallocation, and productivity in Vietnam agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. S. C. West & A. W. Mugera & R. S. Kingwell, 2022. "The choice of efficiency benchmarking metric in evaluating firm productivity and viability," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 193-211, April.
    11. Shiladitya Dey & Piyush K. Singh, 2023. "Role of market participation on smallholder vegetable farmers' wellbeing: Evidence from matching approach in Eastern India," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1217-1237, October.
    12. Mande Zhu & Dongdong Ge & Menghan Wang & Saffa Mohamed Massaquoi & Zhixin Wu, 2025. "Does Construction of High-Standard Farmland Improve Total Factor Productivity of Grain? Evidence from China, 2000–2021," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Wang, Sun Ling & Rada, Nicholas E. & Williams, Ryan C., 2021. "Potential Climatic Effects on the U.S. Crop Farm Productivity," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314088, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Chiarella, Cristina & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Conforti, Piero, 2023. "Balancing the trade-offs between land productivity, labor productivity and labor intensity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(10), pages 1618-1634.
    15. Pengju Wang & Guanghao Wu, 2025. "Modernization and Elasticity of Substitution in China’s Grain Production: Evidence from 1991 to 2023," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Long Qian & Yunjie Zhou & Ying Sun, 2023. "Regional Differences, Distribution Dynamics, and Convergence of the Green Total Factor Productivity of China’s Cities under the Dual Carbon Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Miao, Lu, 2023. "The greenhouse gas rebound effect from increased energy efficiency across China's staple crops," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Thottappilly, Anna, 2021. "Identifying the Income Effect on Nutrition for Agricultural Households: Separability of Production and Consumption," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315335, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Will Chancellor, 2023. "Exploring the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and productivity: Evidence from Australian farms," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(2), pages 285-302, April.
    20. Yu Mao & Yonglin Li & Deyi Xu & Yaqi Wu & Jinhua Cheng, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Total Factor Productivity in Logistics Industry of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1476-:d:1201667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.