IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rae/jouraf/v97y2016i3p173-184.html

Technical efficiency and agricultural policy: evidence from the teaproduction in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Phu Nguyen-Van

    (BETA, CNRS & Université de Strasbourg, 61 avenue de la ForêtNoire, 67000 Strasbourg, France)

  • Nguyen To-The

    (Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to apply the stochasticproduction frontier methodology to a survey database collect-ed in northern Vietnam. Our study finds that the average tech-nical efficiency of tea production is only about 41 %. Amongextension policy measures available to farmers, only trainingon production inputs has an improving impact on technicalefficiency. Other features of policy have no significant effect,contrary to the expectation. The adoption of the oldest varietyBTrung-Du^is not a source of inefficiency while the effects ofother new varieties are insignificant. The results indicate thatthere is a great potential for improving production efficiencyin the region of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Phu Nguyen-Van & Nguyen To-The, 2016. "Technical efficiency and agricultural policy: evidence from the teaproduction in Vietnam," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 97(3), pages 173-184.
    • Handle: RePEc:rae:jouraf:v:97:y:2016:i:3:p:173-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs41130-016-0026-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lampach, Nicolas & To-The, Nguyen & Nguyen-Anh, Tuan, 2021. "Technical efficiency and the adoption of multiple agricultural technologies in the mountainous areas of Northern Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Nguyen To-The & Tuan Nguyen-Anh, 2021. "Impact of government intervention to maize efficiency at farmer’s level across time: a robust evidence in Northern Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2038-2061, February.
    3. Nguyen To The & Anh Nguyen Tuan, 2019. "Efficiency and adoption of organic tea production: Evidence from Vi Xuyen district, Ha Giang province, Vietnam," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 201-217, February.
    4. Sandunika Jayakody & Sajitha Dishanka, 2020. "An Estimation of Technical Efficiency of Tea Smallholdings in Ratnapura District of Sri Lanka," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11.
    5. Kabayiza, Alexis & Owuor, George & Langat, K.J. & Mugenzi, Patrice & Niyitanga, Fidèle, 2021. "Determinants and Effect Evaluation of Credits on the Farm Outcome - a Micro-Perspective of Tea Production from Rwanda," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315091, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rae:jouraf:v:97:y:2016:i:3:p:173-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Saux-Nogues (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.