IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i5p598-d797236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Changes for Investments in Silvoarable Agriculture Projected by the CLUE-S Spatio-Temporal Model

Author

Listed:
  • Stamatia Nasiakou

    (University of Thessaly, GR-38221 Volos, Greece)

  • Michael Vrahnakis

    (Department of Forestry, Wood Sciences and Design, University of Thessaly, GR-43131 Karditsa, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Chouvardas

    (Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgios Mamanis

    (University of Thessaly, GR-38221 Volos, Greece)

  • Vassiliki Kleftoyanni

    (University of Thessaly, GR-38221 Volos, Greece)

Abstract

Investment in biology-based technological innovations is a key requirement for the development of modern agriculture/forestry. The expansion of innovative biological technologies includes changes in crops/cultivations, such as the transition from intensive monocultures to multiple crops of lower agrochemical inputs with the integration of woody trees/shrubs or animals, represented by Agroforestry. This innovative biological technology is further promoted at the European Union (EU) level by powerful institutions such as the Green Deal and the new CAP, mainly by tools such as ecoschemes and agri-environmental and climate measures (AECMs). The use of integrated regional spatiotemporal models, such as CLUE-S, to predict land use changes in the framework of Agroforestry is rather restricted. This paper examines Agroforestry as a vehicle that can contribute to achieving the rural development of the region of Thessaly, Greece. It sets a time horizon for reviewing the changes that are expected in the most important units of land uses of the rural landscape of the municipality of Mouzaki, western Thessaly plain, in the year 2040, which serves as model land for the region of Thessaly. It examines these changes with the effect of three (3) socio-economic scenarios: (a) a linear operating scenario (business as usual, BAU), (b) an ecological land protection (ELP) scenario, and (c) a rapid economic development (RED) scenario. These scenarios were introduced in the non-spatial module of the CLUE-S spatiotemporal model, while in the spatial module sixteen (16) characteristic landscape parameters were introduced as independent variables. The most important land use units, including traditional silvoarable and silvopastoral woodland systems, were the dependent variables. The simulations of the changes of the land use units showed that under the RED scenario, in the year 2040 the extent of the silvoarable systems is expected to increase significantly (57%) compared to the reference year of 2020, while the rest of the land use units under the other scenarios are mainly regulated by depopulation/abandonment of the rural areas and the processes of natural succession. The fact that the extent of silvoarable systems is increasing, in combination with the favorable institutional environment created by European rural policies, gives impetus to regional rural development through investments in the agricultural sector and mainly in Agroforestry systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Stamatia Nasiakou & Michael Vrahnakis & Dimitrios Chouvardas & Georgios Mamanis & Vassiliki Kleftoyanni, 2022. "Land Use Changes for Investments in Silvoarable Agriculture Projected by the CLUE-S Spatio-Temporal Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:598-:d:797236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/598/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/598/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosenhead, Jonathan, 1981. "Operational research in urban planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 345-364.
    2. Jin, Hui & Jorgenson, Dale W., 2010. "Econometric modeling of technical change," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 205-219, August.
    3. Theo van der Sluis & Bas Arts & Kasper Kok & Marion Bogers & Anne Gravsholt Busck & Kalev Sepp & Isabel Loupa-Ramos & Vangelis Pavlis & Nicoleta Geamana & Emilie Crouzat, 2019. "Drivers of European landscape change: stakeholders’ perspectives through Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 458-476, May.
    4. Bingmiao Zhu & Xun Zhu & Ran Zhang & Xiaolong Zhao, 2019. "Study of Multiple Land Use Planning Based on the Coordinated Development of Wetland Farmland: A Case Study of Fuyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Ruttan, Vernon W., 1987. "Induced innovation and agricultural development," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 196-216, August.
    6. Neyra-Cabatac, Neyrma M. & Pulhin, Juan M. & Cabanilla, Daylinda B., 2012. "Indigenous agroforestry in a changing context: The case of the Erumanen ne Menuvu in Southern Philippines," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 18-27.
    7. de Koning, G. H. J. & Verburg, P. H. & Veldkamp, A. & Fresco, L. O., 1999. "Multi-scale modelling of land use change dynamics in Ecuador," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 77-93, August.
    8. Georgios Mamanis & Michael Vrahnakis & Dimitrios Chouvardas & Stamatia Nasiakou & Vassiliki Kleftoyanni, 2021. "Land Use Demands for the CLUE-S Spatiotemporal Model in an Agroforestry Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Abdus Samie & Xiangzheng Deng & Siqi Jia & Dongdong Chen, 2017. "Scenario-Based Simulation on Dynamics of Land-Use-Land-Cover Change in Punjab Province, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, July.
    10. World Bank, 2005. "Agriculture Investment Sourcebook," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7308, April.
    11. repec:rri:bkchap:17 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Mishra, Mukesh Kumar, 2020. "Application of Operational Research in Sustainable Environmental Management and Climate Change," EconStor Preprints 215782, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    13. Andrés Weintraub & B. Bruce Bare, 1996. "New Issues in Forest Land Management from an Operations Research Perspective," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 9-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Apostolos P. Kyriazopoulos & Maria Karatassiou & Zoi M. Parissi & Eleni M. Abraham & Paraskevi Sklavou, 2022. "Effects of Ski-Resort Activities and Transhumance Livestock Grazing on Rangeland Ecosystems of Mountain Zireia, Southern Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Shuangqing Sheng & Hua Lian, 2023. "The Spatial Pattern Evolution of Rural Settlements and Multi-Scenario Simulations since the Initiation of the Reform and Opening up Policy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Bonoua Faye & Guoming Du & Edmée Mbaye & Chang’an Liang & Tidiane Sané & Ruhao Xue, 2023. "Assessing the Spatial Agricultural Land Use Transition in Thiès Region, Senegal, and Its Potential Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Yusong Xie & Katsue Fukamachi & Wen Wang & Shozo Shibata, 2023. "Exploring Land Use Management Strategies through Morphological Spatial Patterns Using a Climate–Socioeconomic-Based Land Use Simulation Modeling Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Dimitrios Chouvardas & Maria Karatassiou & Petros Tsioras & Ioannis Tsividis & Stefanos Palaiochorinos, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Changes (1945–2020) in a Grazed Landscape of Northern Greece, in Relation to Socioeconomic Changes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Jin, Hong & Li, Heping & Lee, Jia & Sun, Weitong, 2023. "Simulation analysis of rural land use using rate of change driven by population and economic dynamics - A case study of Huangguashan village in Chongqing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    7. Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Natural Environment Protection Strategies and Green Management Style: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Dimitrios Chouvardas & Maria Karatassiou & Afroditi Stergiou & Garyfallia Chrysanthopoulou, 2022. "Identifying the Spatiotemporal Transitions and Future Development of a Grazed Mediterranean Landscape of South Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peretto, Pietro F. & Valente, Simone, 2011. "Resources, innovation and growth in the global economy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 387-399.
    2. Pietro F. Peretto & Simone Valente, 2010. "Resource Wealth, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 10/124, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    3. Tim J. Coelli & D. S. Prasada Rao, 2005. "Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 115-134, January.
    4. Kurt Kratena & Michael Wüger, 2012. "Technological Change and Energy Demand in Europe," WIFO Working Papers 427, WIFO.
    5. Joseph I. Uduji & Elda N. Okolo-Obasi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2020. "Analysis of Farmers’ Food Price Volatility and Nigeria’s Growth Enhancement Support Scheme," Research Africa Network Working Papers 20/069, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    6. Beichen Ge & Congjin Wang & Yuhong Song, 2023. "Ecosystem Services Research in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Alan Randall, 1978. "Property Institutions and Economic Behavior," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Aryal, Jeetendra Prakash & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Thapa, Ganesh & Simtowe, Franklin, 2021. "Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Shengqiang Yang & Donglin Li & Heping Liao & Lin Zhu & Miaomiao Zhou & Zhicong Cai, 2023. "Analysis of the Balance between Supply and Demand of Arable Land in China Based on Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Haixia Wu & Yan Ge, 2019. "Excessive Application of Fertilizer, Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution, and Farmers’ Policy Choice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Zhengxu Zhou & Ziyu Jia & Nian Wang & Ming Fang, 2018. "Sustainable Mountain Village Construction Adapted to Livelihood, Topography, and Hydrology: A Case of Dong Villages in Southeast Guizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Colin Barlow & S. K. Jayasurija, 1986. "Stages of Development in Smallholder Tree Crop Agriculture," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 635-658, October.
    13. David Lewis & Stephen Biggs & Scott E. Justice, 2022. "Rural mechanization for equitable development: Disarray, disjuncture, and disruption," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    14. Idelphonse O. Saliou & Afio Zannou & Augustin K. N. Aoudji & Albert N. Honlonkou, 2020. "Drivers of Mechanization in Cotton Production in Benin, West Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Lukas Cechura & Aaron Grau & Heinrich Hockmann & Inna Levkovych & Zdenka Kroupova, 2017. "Catching Up or Falling Behind in European Agriculture: The Case of Milk Production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 206-227, February.
    16. Rafael Epstein & Ramiro Morales & Jorge Serón & Andres Weintraub, 1999. "Use of OR Systems in the Chilean Forest Industries," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 7-29, February.
    17. Scheierling, S. M., 2010. "Improving wastewater use in agriculture: an emerging priority," IWMI Working Papers H043153, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Baccianti, Claudio, 2013. "Estimation of sectoral elasticities of substitution along the international technology frontier," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-092, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    19. Dimopoulou, Maria & Giannikos, Ioannis, 2004. "Towards an integrated framework for forest fire control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 476-486, January.
    20. Hossain, A K M Nurul & Serletis, Apostolos, 2020. "Technical change in U.S. industries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 579-600.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:598-:d:797236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.